Steyer improved from a 20% to 38% chance in tonight’s VoteHub WinCast update, driven by ballots in key counties shifting toward him and confirmation of high outstanding turnout in urban areas.
Hilton still has a slight edge, now tracking to defeat Steyer by 0.6%.
right now its fucking tit for tat with democrats and leftist both pointing at the otherside and condemning for each for not voting for there candidate. democrats are seemingly trying or at least being passive on taking down Graham when the people of Maine have already made there choice, are we gonnna switch-a-roo this shit like 2024?
It gets more insane. This is a right-wing smear campaign. NY Post, 2018:
"Inez Stepman and Lindsey Fifield are two millennial women who co-founded the group Ladies for Kavanaugh to show their support for the nominee... Their pro-Kavanaugh group was formed on their own time."
What the fuck is the alternative? Hastily get rid of him and prop up a someone no one want to vote for?? How’d that go last time? You made a definitive claim without even reading it
It was always pretty gross whenever conservatives tried to discredit various women who accused Trump of SA by pointing out any ties they had to the Democratic Party 🤷♂️
If everyones a artist then no ones an artist. The barrier to entry isnt your lack of ability to pick up a pencil, it's having enough confidence to visualize your image YOURSELF. Asking Ai is no different from just asking a random person to follow your instructions then take create for it because you only had the idea, but didn't have enough talent to make it yourself
An AI artist is an artist.
A photographer is an artist.
A digital artist is an artist.
A writer is an artist.
Medium doesn't decide the purity, it determines the story.
A trash can artist is impressive because he paints beautifully with unconventional tools. AI is no threat to his craft, because he owns his story.
My AI creator moots have interesting stories. The question is, where's yours?
You are arupid as sin if you think his comments was just him "liking his old tools" hes 20, if the young guard is saying fuck ai its not because its like any other tool. If you are too lazy to learn how ro actually build anything yourself thats fine, but you are not a artist, you have a machine genie that does all the work for you. Your machine creates your universe not, you
@gran1te_mtn@Rahll Do you think generative ai is real art and should those artists receive the same sort of validation as a real artist? I’m asking your opinion not objectively since you are “hands off”
My problem with this kind of statement is that it's clapture.
If he said "I don't personally use it" it would have expressed the same thing, but he knows he can rally an audience by being resolute.
@bitcloud Or ahe’s being sincere and thinks that people who skip the creative process to have there machine genie do it for them are not “well-adjusted” people
How are we supposed to know if ai was used in the final product when they admit they used it to create it? Unless ai can be watermarked or universally identified, are we just to trust companies when they admit to using it but what you are buying it they can say whatever they want
Tomb Raider: Legacy of Atlantis comes with an AI disclaimer on its Steam page
Crystal Dynamics told Eurogamer they “Leverage AI tools to help our teams iterate on ideas faster and more efficiently, while ensuring that all finished content in the final product is human-crafted”
Answer my question. Did de Vinci paint the painting or not? If Gordon Ramsey wants a meatloaf, told one of his chefs to make a meatloaf, gave precise instructions and then now has a meatloaf in front of him, did Gordon Ramsey cook that mean? Not his TEAM or his TOOLBOX did he himself make that meal?
If de Vinci instead of physically painting the last supper himself instead instructed someone to do it for him, did he paint that painting? What did he create? What was the process? All he did was give a command and if he closed his eyes and saw the finished work, he wouldn’t be able to tell if man or god painted, but it for sure wasn’t him.
You are whining children seeking validation at a fraction of the effort, with technology that requires zero work.which defeats the purpose. all you care about is end result, which if were true, then nobody would despise you people, but people DO care about the process, which is why the quality was never the issue, it was a short sided grievance to the larger problem. People care about art, you don’t
@bitcloud All you are saying is that everyone will inevitably accept it which is saying nothing, public opinion is not going to change on this unless it’s manufactured by the people who desperately need to have proof of concept to justify the cost and valuation
@MOVIETVWRITERX@RoyPrice Absolutely no one was saying cgi was going to replace the entire creative process from the top down, which is what you people want to do
@baggins1986@JoshDaws You actually have to have talent to use blender, at least you start building it, there is no growth in asking a machine genie to make your slop and for you to get the validation you can’t get yourself
@titusfilm@JoshDaws If you aren’t able to gather that this man would spit in your face because of your slop then you are refusing to listen to what he literally said, your exactly the problem he is talking about