DogeBarf

The holy trinity. ₿, Ð, 👁️Ł👁️
You need nothing else.
(Except of course Freedom and Guns. And powerful Computers. And a loud voice!)

[DogeBarf @dogebarf]

Damn, $Doge 1$ is coming very soon, and its battlecry is gonna be heard around the world!

[︎ ︎venom @venom1s]

Woman - “No means no. Leave me alone.”

Man - Leaves her alone.

She...

[KickOverdose @KickOverdose]

Clavicular is actually UNHINGED💀

"wanna go have s*x?" 😏

"no" 🤨

"alright then we got no use for you"😭

[💎Mk💍 @MKntheMost]

this doesn’t work because men’s standards are :

Just don’t be fat (easy)
Just be nice (easy)
Just don’t be a whore (easy)

W*men’s standards is just:

Be tall (genetics)
Have a good bone structure (genetics)
Just have good genetics in general..

[Joe🇹🇷🇭🇺 @joelover123__]

Women when their looksmatch isn’t a one in a trillion genetic miracle

[Devon Eriksen @Devon_Eriksen_]

A vast number of humans, probably a majority, aren't people.

They are large language models.

I'm not saying this as a generality, as a clever or funny way of saying, "they are stupid".

No. I mean something very concrete and specific, and there are a lot of people who appear very intelligent, maybe even win awards for writing good poetry or something, who are nevertheless not people, not fully sapient, just a large language model walking around in a human body.

First, you have to understand what a large language model is.

It's a computer (organic or inorganic), which has been trained on a data set consisting solely of language (written or spoken), and rewarded for producing language that sounds like the data set, and is relevant to a prompt.

That's all there is in there.

This is why ChatGPT and Grok lie to you constantly.

It's not because they are somehow just indifferent to the truth — they actually do not understand the concept of "truth" at all.

For something to be a "lie", or an "inaccuracy", there has to be a mismatch between the meaning of words, and the state of reality.

And there's the critical difference. You see, in order to identify a mismatch between the state of reality, and the meaning of a sentence, you have to have a model of reality.

Not just one model, of language.

This is why Grok and ChatGPT hallucinate and tell you lies. Because, for them, everything is language, and there is no reality.

So when I say someone is a large language model, I do not mean he is "stupid". He might be very facile at processing language. He might, in fact, be eloquent enough to give great speeches, get elected president, win the Nobel Peace Prize, and so on.

What I mean is that humans who are large language models do not have a robust world-object model to counterweight their language model. They are able to manipulate symbols, sometimes adroitly, but they are on far shakier ground when trying imagine the objects those symbols represent.

Which brings us to this woman.

Most conservatives understand her behavior in terms of concepts like "suicidal empathy", or "brainwashing", or an "information bubble", interpreted as reasons why she is delusional, but the truth is far worse than that.

To delusional is to have an object model of the world that is deeply and profoundly wrong. But to have an object model of the world that is deeply and profoundly wrong... you have to have one in the first place.

To sapient humans, words are symbols, grounded in object model of reality, that we use to communicate ideas about that reality. We need those words because we don't come equipped with a hologram projector, or telepathic powers.

But for another type of human, that object model isn't very large or robust at all. It consists only of a grass hut or two with a few sticks of furniture, and it can never be matched up with the palaces in the air which she weaves out of words.

And so, to her, there is no reality. Or at least very little.

Reality consists only of her and her immediate surroundings in time and space, and words referring to anything bigger or more complicated are not descriptions of reality... they are magic spells which will make other humans drop loot or give her social approval.

You cannot correct her worldview with contradictory evidence, because there is no worldview to correct.

You cannot confront her with the logical inconsistencies in her worldview, because her object model doesn't actually have any, it's not complex enough for that.

The relevant parts of her world-object model can be summed up as follows:

"If I say Goodthing, I get headpats and cookies from all the people like me."

That model is simply not big or complicated enough to contain notions like self-defense or vehicular assault. She has no theory of mind for a man whose job includes violence. She cannot explain or predict his behavior.

It is too far away from her daily experience to fit into her reality at all.

And if she can't imagine things like these, how can she possibly imagine concrete meanings for vast and complex ideas like demographic replacement, culture shift, and western civilization?

This is not about intelligence or lack of it. This is about what her brain is trained to do.

Her upbringing, education, and life did not force, or even encourage, her to develop a robust world-object model. It wasn't necessary for her to get safety, approval, or cookies. She just had to be glib.

So it really didn't matter if she had an IQ of 125, or whatever, because if she did, then she was just an IQ-125-large-language-model, and only used that brain capacity for writing clever poetry, and saying things that aligned her to her local social matrix.

She couldn't actually understand the world no matter how smart she was, because her brain was trained up wrong.

I don't know if this is correctable, or if there was some critical developmental phase that was missed, but it doesn't matter, because once the LLM-humans are adults, they won't sit still for corrective therapy, percussive or not.

What's important is that they can't be taught things. They can be programmed to repeat stuff, and if you win a culture war, you can even program them to say the sensible stuff. But even then, they will just be saying it for headpats and cookies. They will never truly understand the sense of what they are repeating, because they don't understand things.

They are just Large Language Models.

And we have to figure out some way to take the vote away from them.

[Athenaeum Book Club @athenaeumbc]

In 1945, Solzhenitsyn was a decorated Soviet officer who made a small, private joke about Stalin in a letter.

The state opened it, read it, and treated it as a crime. Within weeks he was arrested and stripped of rank. He was fed into the camps, and sentenced to eight years in the Gulag.

The camps were designed to teach one lesson: say nothing, remember nothing, become nothing. He shoveled frozen concrete until his hands split and bled.

Years later, Solzhenitsyn would write, “Bless you, prison, for having been in my life.” It sounds insane until you understand what he meant. Prison showed him the truth of the regime in its purest form.

After his release, the punishment did not end. He lived under constant surveillance, moving from place to place, knowing that writing a single page could mean death. So he did not write. He memorized. Whole chapters of The Gulag Archipelago lived only in his head. Friends hid scraps of text. Wives memorized passages. For years the book existed only in human memory, as fragile and dangerous as a secret prayer.

When it was finally published, it did not argue that Soviet communism had gone too far. It showed that this was exactly where it led. Solzhenitsyn had learned that systems built on lies survive only if people agree to repeat them, and that the simplest refusal… to stop saying what you know is false… is the first and most dangerous act of resistance.

[Devon Eriksen @Devon_Eriksen_]

The exact kind of person I am talking about always shows up in the comments to prove my point.

Larry isn't dumb. He's BRAIN DAMAGED. I mean that literally. He was exposed repeatedly to software so pernicious that it actually damaged his hardware, and now he can't think right.

To him, the world primarily consists, not of mass and energy arranged into physical objects, but of ideas and people having them.

And words aren't symbols for communicating about the physical objects and what is actually going on. They are magic spells for reprogramming people's opinions.

So when I said something Larry didn't like, he didn't stop to consider what it actually meant about the states of physical objects in the real universe. He didn't consider whether my arrangement of symbols actually described reality in a predictive way.

If he had, he would have said that clearly humans all have object models, because they can drive cars and charge their phones and whatnot. Then I would have said that I never said that they didn't, just these models are so sparse that they are eclipsed by people's language models as a determinants of their behavior.

Then this would have been a debate, which what people who aren't LLMs do when they disagree about objective truth.

But Larry didn't do that.

He just considered what words he could string together into a magic spell to make people not listen to me.

And if objective truth don't real to you, only infinity points of view, then you are just a large language model.

His specific chosen magic spell was a variation on the ancient theme of "you reported bad news, therefore you like bad news, therefore you are a big meanie, which is worse than being wrong, because nothing is real and only opinions matter."

There's no sense pointing out that this is bullshit, because the word bullshit in this context means "not true", and that only matters if you have a model of truth in your head.

Larry's goal in opening his mouth isn't to make some point about whether or not it's TRUE that some people are equivalent to LLMs.

His goal is to align with his training data, which in this case is religious, not political, but it's training data all the same.

But that's my whole point.

The goal of an LLM is to align with its training data.

The goal of a person is to align to the universe as it actually is.

Which you are depends not on what you believe, but on how you arrived at those beliefs, and how you hold them.

And the difference can be told, not by what you believe, but what your beliefs make you say and do.

[STUNNER @Cr7Godbrand]

Feminists don’t really hate men.
What they resent is nature….but since nature can’t be accused of misogyny, men become the stand-ins.

Men didn’t write the rules. Nature did. We’re all just operating within them.

Men didn’t decide which sex gets pregnant.
Men didn’t choose who carries children, experiences monthly cycles, or goes through menopause.
Men didn’t design female biology.

Men didn’t make women physically weaker on average, nor did men decide that women’s safety would often depend on protection from stronger men. That imbalance wasn’t voted on…it emerged naturally.

Men didn’t wire hormones to fluctuate or create emotional volatility under stress.
Men didn’t install a biological clock that narrows dating options with age.
That wasn’t patriarchy…it was biology.

Men didn’t program women to prefer men who are taller, wealthier, and higher in status, then turn around and complain that dating is unfair.
Nature shaped those preferences long before modern society existed.

Men didn’t decide that female happiness would be so tightly linked to appearance, youth, and attention.
Men didn’t cause self-worth to decline as external validation fades.

There was no secret gathering where men agreed to give women period pain, UTIs, yeast infections, or hormonal discomfort.
Men didn’t design the game. Nature did.

And when a man has many sexual options, it’s seen as impressive….not because men arbitrarily declared it so, but because women are naturally selective. A man who passes that filter demonstrates value.
When a woman rejects that same biological wiring, the judgment doesn’t come from men alone…it comes from biology itself.

Men didn’t decide that the world rewards traditionally masculine traits with status and punishes traditionally feminine traits with vulnerability.

Men didn’t write this code. Nature did.
So stop blaming men for realities created by biology. Copied.

[Devon Eriksen @Devon_Eriksen_]

In addition, the first thing any properly trained medical practitioner does, on walking into the room with a new patient is to identity:

What his name is.
What his job is.
What he is in this room for.

Ideally before the patient has a chance to open his mouth.

[DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican]

@esrtweet @Devon_Eriksen_ I'm uncomfortable with people as literal non-sapient NPCs, but watching all those women activists pick a fight with physics in videos does have me pondering a lot.

Regardless, I agree that conditioning was involved in some way.

[Eric S. Raymond @esrtweet]

https://t.co/ylV9PCppuX

@Devon_Eriksen_ wrote this post about people without an object model, and then I saw the bodycam footage of Renee trying to ram the Designated Bad Guy with her car, and I think she's...the perfect example.

I think she died because she lived in a universe of words that left her unable to imagine any outcome of ramming the Designated Bad Guy other than getting head pats and cookies from other word people.

I think she was unable to actually encompass violence as an object-level phenomenon and truly comprehend that when she stepped on the gas a human being was likely to die under her wheels.

I'm getting this from the weirdly cheerful expression on her face just before she attempted murder. That was chilling. More frightening than an angry snarl would have been. Complete disconnect from reality.

Every time I watch that footage it gets creepier.

[Schadenfreudecel @WinnipegBello]

After women lose their virginity, they can't truly love unless you're attractive. If you're an average man, you'll only experience the cold stagnate exchange of what women give lesser men to use them. Foids are heartless wretches. Cold robotic manipulators.

[Jerry West @JerryWest2025]

Just sold condoms to a couple

Guy was an 8/10
Girl was a 3/10

Its so over

[Schadenfreudecel @WinnipegBello]

It's really not surprising. There are numerous studies about how women are attracted to criminals and antisocial behavior. They'll only start whining if fellow foids are the victims.

[Ëra @_saratonnin]

what a lot of men need to realize is women actually like being told what to do. It’s the art of how u tell her to do it that matters

[MR SHIFT 🦁 @KevinWSHPod]

Talked to a female friend today

27 years old, looks: 6.5/10 max, makes ok money, self sustainable, smart

Asked her how much money the man she would settle for would need to make

« He needs to have a few millions in the bank » she said

This generation is so cooked man

[Cam Higby 🇺🇸 @camhigby]

This is the individual who STALKED me for over a mile. He was insistent on riling up crowds so that they would harm me. I was trying to leave a MN protest.

He says he believes it would be justified for people to HURT OR KILL ME based on my beliefs. Calls it “self defense”

[Myrna 𝕏 @GigaBeers]

Put this on a loop…highly recommend 🤣