@just_norm@JoePompliano@BarstoolHubbs Something to do with his insurance cos lending money to the network that bought the broadcast rights for $8B-ish which provided the fuel for them to be able to pay the players. A bit of a closed loop (someone else’s term) but if one hiccup occurs the whole thing collapses.
@MaggieLJohnson@ZehDuck The amount of weed I smell in the school drop-off line is INSANE. And this is an ELEMENTARY school…in what most would consider a very nice suburb. Poor kids getting out of those cars and going into school reeking of it through no fault of their own.
Actor David Spade raising awareness that a bill was introduced in California to audit where the $20+ billion dollars in missing homeless money went, it passed but then Gavin Newsom VETOED the bill to block the investigation
Yes, this really happened. He blocked bills for an audit MULTIPLE TIMES
Bipartisan bill AB 2903 (unanimous passed 72-0 in the Assembly, 40-0 in the Senate) would’ve forced annual public reports on where the money went
Newsom vetoed it.
Gavin Newsom also vetoed similar bills AB 2570 and AB 2093
“The same broader problem with people paying taxes in California — The homeless, they lose $20 billion, but they want more money for it. That's why people get tired of paying taxes and going, what are you doing? Gavin Newsom just vetoed a bill asking for an audit of where the money for homeless goes. He said, not a chance. You're not gonna see that. That's the problem.”
@shegone03@MLB@notgaetti@BobFile@twuench@billdubs@SliderDominate@slider_sinker Why does he close his eyes as he catches the ball? (This in addition everything else that’s been said) Set target, pitcher hit target, watch ball into glove, subtle movement to frame if needed (won’t be once ABS fully active at least at pro level). Make pitcher’s life easier.
@BaseballQuotes1 According to how the rule is written it was 100% the right call. But in reality there is a HUGE difference between this and a ball that disappears into the ivy at Wrigley. Correct call by rule, but the rule is terrible. Both things can be true.
@21FrankS@BaseballQuotes1 According to how the rule is written, yes. But in reality there is a HUGE difference between this and a ball that disappears into the ivy at Wrigley. Correct call by rule, but it’s a sh*t rule. Both things can be true.
@mizzodcast This…this is exactly what I would like to understand. Yards after contact beast and you don’t give it to him with a yard to gain? Many times he’s not even on the field. Make it make sense.
@bamabyte@BadSportsRefs So let’s take your quoted definition. Then show me where he crouched to launch. It’s not there…watch the full replay. Not disputing it was violent contact, but it was a football play and the shove to the back of the receiver put Burks in an impossible position.
@bamabyte@BadSportsRefs Maybe, but the rules disagree…”when a player leaves their feet to attack an opponent by thrusting their body upward”. And I’m pretty sure I acknowledged that the top of the helmet made contact with the chin. Don’t be a dick…and please learn reading comprehension.
@bamabyte@BadSportsRefs Top of helmet was on the chin but didn’t lead with the crown. No launch…watch the replay…Burks’s foot on the ground when contact occurred. WR pushed from behind changes the timing. What is Burks supposed to do…not possible to react. Maybe a penalty but ejection was ridiculous.
@gregberge Success is the product of daily habits
Your lowest speed needs to be full speed
Find a way or make a way
Don’t listen to the bitch ass part of your brain
Don't let what's already happened effect what's next