WOAH 🚨 Investigative journalist Catherine Herridge reviewed the documents just released by the Trump Admin on election integrity and finds CIA emails showing they were working against Donald Trump to aid China and the Democrats in the 2020 election
“I've been digging into the documents already and I found this November 2020 email, and it specifically states, it's a conversation among intelligence officials, it specifically states that they have, quote, deliberately massaged one of our pending PDBs. That's the president's daily brief. To avoid any direct links to the election”
“This was a massive effort, what they call a multi-domain operation. That means trade, it means diplomacy, it means open-source information, it means social media. So all the levers of power China had to influence the US election”
And our own CIA worked to make sure the r President wasn’t aware of any of this information, they literally removed it from his daily briefing
Literally treason
“In the summer of 2020, as we're heading into the election, in the intelligence community there were indicators of this Chinese influence operation. Influence operations means that you're trying to affect the outcome of how people vote or their sentiment about a presidential candidate.
It's different than an interference operation, which is penetrating voting rolls and voter systems. And this whistleblower was raising the alarm about the influence operation, and then suddenly it all was suppressed”
“In some of their reports, there were in officials' own handwriting that they wanted everything out that could help President Trump in his reelection. So there was clear evidence of political and personal bias”
They wanted to remove EVERYTHING that could possibly help Trump win reelection
Again, literally treason
Also if you remember awhile back, a former CIA officer named Pedro Israel Orta who worked at the CIA during the Trump Administration said the CIA didn’t even recognize him as the President, they wouldn’t even put his picture up on the wall which was customary for all Presidents
They were actively working against him
NBC, ABC, and CNN refused to air President Trump’s speech on foreign election interference because they say it erodes trust in our elections.
Here’s 4 minutes of Dems eroding trust in the 2016 election.
It’s not principled. It’s propaganda.
The @splcenter branded law-abiding parents as "extremists" & has been indicted on federal charges.
"Your 'hate map' completely & spectacularly FAILED. It didn't cancel @Awake_IL or any of the parent groups."
My open letter to SPLC President Bryan Fair 🧵
Per our @MorningAnswer discussion on @BobWoodson's most excellent piece on the rise and fall of Jesse Jackson, Sr...and the parallels to Illinois' loss of civic sensibility across race, partisanship writ large, here it is:
Jesse Jackson, the Prophet Who Became a Politician
At a memorial service for the Rev. Jesse Jackson, his son Jesse Jr. praised his “consistent prophetic voice.” There is truth to that. The Jesse Jackson I remember began his career as a prophetic voice to the nation. The tragedy is that he didn’t always remain faithful to that calling.
I met Jesse Jackson in the late 1960s. In those years, he spoke clearly about the crisis facing black America. He understood that the struggle before black youth wasn’t merely economic but moral. In an August 1978 essay for Ebony, he observed that if the rising generation of black youth hoped to “close the gap and catch up” in income and education, their priority should be discipline:
“Morally weak people not only inhibit their own personal growth, but finally contribute to the politics of decadence. . . . A generation of people lacking the moral and physical stamina necessary to fight a protracted civilizational crisis is dangerous to itself, its neighbors and to future generations.”
This was the true spirit of the civil-rights movement: moral uprising, not mere political maneuvering. Jackson anticipated the objections of readers who would rather remain fixated on racism: “While I know that the victimizer may be responsible for the victim being down, the victim must be responsible for getting up.” Those were not the words of a partisan politician. They were the words of a moral reformer.
At his best, Jackson confronted not only injustice from without, but the moral failures within our own communities. He spoke of responsibility and self-determination and challenged wounded people not to surrender to victimhood. Many of us respected him for that. I certainly did.
After he entered the partisan machinery, his prophetic voice gradually gave way to the language of grievance, compromise and self-preservation. He no longer spoke primarily as a reformer, but as a performer on the political stage—a power broker. His focus strayed from rebuilding the moral and social foundations of struggling communities toward mobilizing their resentments.
That decline wasn’t merely the problem of Jesse Jackson. It reflected a broader shift in America itself. The early civil-rights movement was grounded in discipline, sacrifice and character. Its strongest leaders spoke not only about the sins of segregation but also about the responsibilities of freedom, understanding that justice without moral renewal would leave communities politically visible but internally broken.
It was therefore telling that in 2008, when Sen. Barack Obama challenged young men to be responsible fathers, Jackson accused him of “speaking down to black people”—even though Jackson had delivered the same message to Mr. Obama’s generation in Ebony 30 years earlier.
Like Jackson, Mr. Obama eventually chose the safety of racial grievance over the harder work of moral challenge. Instead of seeking to inspire struggling communities to rise above destructive behaviors, both men came to see that political power could be gained by keeping wounds open.
When leaders become dependent on outrage, solutions become threats to their power. Chicago, the adopted hometown of both Jackson and Mr. Obama, proves the point. Jackson rose in a political culture of entrenched corruption, where moral accountability was too often weakened by ethnic loyalty and party interest. Rather than resist this culture, Jackson and other civil-rights veterans were absorbed by it.
Repeatedly, when elected black officials were disgraced by corruption, betrayal of the public trust, or sexual misconduct—even in cases involving minors—the response was silence, along with a troubling indifference to young black female victims who were ignored. In at least two such cases, these officials were re-elected. When wrongdoing wears a black face, too many who speak loudly of justice fall quiet.
We often demand equity when it comes to the distribution of resources yet resist equality when it comes to moral responsibility and character. We have wanted moral leniency for “our side” while demanding accountability from others. Yet communities can’t be rebuilt on double standards. The poor suffer most when leaders are excused in the name of race, party or history.
Before Jesse Jackson became absorbed in partisan politics, he did speak for the least of these. And when he drifted from that witness, I challenged him, as did many quietly frustrated veterans of the civil-rights movement. I debated him publicly and held him not to my words, but to his own. Did you mean it when you said the victimizer may knock you down, but the victim must get up? If so, when did you change your mind, and why? His later rhetoric stood in plain tension with the moral force of his earlier views.
Social movements begin to decline when they trade moral authority for political access. Low-income Americans know the difference between genuine leadership and political performance because they are the ones left to live with the consequences when leaders abandon principle for power.
The next phase of progress won’t come through confrontational slogans or deeper partisan alliances. It will come when the people demand leaders who refuse to be seduced by power, who speak honestly about both injustice and responsibility. Because real leadership isn’t measured by proximity to power, but by faithfulness to truth.
@larryelder Thanks for posting, Larry. Saw you posted my earlier AT piece, "Black Comedians Told Uncomfortable Truths...." We've met a couple of time at Cigars with Proft & Elder and Freedom Summit. Big fan of yours
@jasonwhitlock I know Pastor Brooks. Met him many times. He's the real deal doing the real work. As an Uber driver in Chicago, I've been down "O Block" hundreds of times. I've driven into Parkway Gardens. Not pretty, Larry Jackson. No one "wants" to live there. Stop glorifying it.
@RealCandaceO@NikkiHaley Wrote this a couple weeks later. Same theme. Same conclusion. The Oprahs, Obamas and the rest of the celebrity trash have the means and the muscle to do something life changing and lasting for blacks. But they won't. They just won't. https://t.co/MquKQr91PB
@RealCandaceO@NikkiHaley Just watched your expose on Larry Jackson pushing filth and had to pick my jaw up off the floor after you said he's "very good friends with Oprah..." Because in 2007 Oprah had a 2 part show condemning rap filth. I wrote about it here:
https://t.co/NVymTqSVel
Student: "What do you have to say to the trans students on this campus who feel actively victimized by your presence here?"
@RealCandaceO: "Life's tough. Get a helmet, man."