@MarkRein Why is it that MAGA folks and so-called progressives on the left (some of whom have a parochial financial stake) so often resort to baseless ad hominem attacks instead of substance? Maybe they don’t have substance on their side.
When I wrote about this race in April, almost everyone I spoke to agreed that Weiser was outhustling Bennet on the ground and drawing larger crowds:
https://t.co/qOTfexqpBo
@PGunigantiAT@wagonweill If the Center will investigate with open minds whether and to what extent law should structure the economy, it would not be hard to find good economists. If the Center is intended to elaborate a preordained answer to that question, it has no place at a serious university.
@capturehappy@BarbMcQuade The distinction is between furthering the purposes of the and faithfully executing the laws vs sacrificing those purposes and laws or compromising them to pursue political or corrupt purposes
@superwuster Do you mean that the govt sent her to the OECD to represent the US, as is customary for the AAG, forced her resignation while she was there, and then refused to pay her airfare back?
🚨NEW: Elon Musk has suspended U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar's Twitter account. This comes as the Trump Administration and its allies ratchet up attacks on Minnesota in the aftermath of the ICE Renee Good killing.
RETWEET if you stand with @AmyKlobuchar!
@lawprofblawg@Sherman1890@TedTatos It’s important to distinguish the desired outcomes (e.g., price, output), from the means chosen. Antitrust is about prohibiting anticompetitive conduct that increases market power. Outcomes are not elements of the offense.
@TedTatos@Sherman1890@lawprofblawg Antitrust is not concerned with only price and output, but focusing on them has almost nothing to do with overlooking monopsony power. Like seller market power, monopsony power can harm trading partners because of its effects on (reducing) price and output.
@matthewstoller More proof, if any were needed, that the most pathetic ad hominem attacks are based on total ignorance.
It’s also rather amusing that perhaps the most outspoken proponent of the so-called “antimonopoly” movement is lamenting the decline of a formally vilified monopolist.