UK policy of INVOLUNTARY MASS EUTHANASIA of our elderly in care homes during Covid, using death row drug MIDAZOLAM with morphine, was raised by @ABridgen MP yesterday at a parliamentary debate on EXCESS DEATH
RECEIPTS & full FREE Interview with Dr Wilson Sy on how MIDAZOLAM statistically caused UK excess death: https://t.co/2FAAJaxLs3
cc @ng16322
Folks this is a very serious Q All my mates & Just about everyone I meet or talk to in London & I’m a talkative feller have told me their NOT Voting for Sadiq Khan; some even say his name differently; well I know I don’t know Everyone BUT? Who the Feck is voting for this bloke?🤷♂️
I can’t believe he’s lasted this long. He lives in Scotland and is bashing Scottish heritage. Scotland is full of Scots. If he doesn’t think it’s diverse enough then he needs to go back to where his family is from and I guarantee where he is from is not very diverse. The people of Scotland needs to rise up and stand up against the government that is trying to erase them.
'Nurse teacher' John Campbell always the last to know - after promoting the 'Covid' hoax and the fake vaccine only to retract he discovers Midazolam mass murder years after some of us broke the story.
"Did the British government use midazolam to create the wave that justified all of the restrictions?"
@ABridgen MP on The Freeman Report @tntradiolive
Playback: https://t.co/wteqDxbCXd
WOAH
They gave elderly covid patients an injection called Midazolam - The same thing given to inmates on death row.
Listen to this British politician talk about it in parliament.
The truth is coming out 👇
Humza Yousef told reporters that he 'expected' to win a vote of no-confidence.
When asked how, he confidently said that he's going to write everyone a letter.
I'm pretty sure this man is a colossal pillock.
There aren’t that many things which send a chill down my spine.
But this does.
It is so far removed from reality that whether you like me or loathe me, it should terrify you.
Because you are next.
Today at 2pm the costs order following the libel judgement is handed down. I’ll have sight of it an hour before.
I prefer to call it the bullies charter rather than a judgement and I disagree with the result profoundly. The judge found that because I engage is discussions about controversial issues then it is fair game to call me racist, whilst at the same time not defining what a racist is, which seems entirely illogical. If the same logic is applied fairly then calling someone who angle grinds on a metal codpiece in front of children would seem to carry the same stipulation.
She also found that the two men suffered serious harm, despite the fact that everyone on the other side of this trial has been promoted since. Go figure.
A large part of me wants to walk away and forget about it but I’m not going to. We think the judge was wrong, and when we have appealed decisions during this process in the past, we have won. The court of appeal ruled that my response to Nicola Thorp was rhetorical and threw her case out. Why they didn’t do the same with the others is anyone’s guess.
It is my hope that we succeed on appeal, despite a worrying sense that the justice may not be as blind as we’ve been led to believe. The process has been punishment enough.
It cannot be right that society rewards those who throw the first punch in a fight. It can also not be right that once punched, one is denied a reply to attack. I was called a racist and I responded rhetorically with an equally slanderous and untrue attack, to make the point that these allegations have very damaging effects on one’s life. My acting career ended the day after the three claimants called me a racist.
We had to go back to court many times to get them to disclose messages between them when they were making light about what they were going to do to me. This evidence, along with the vast majority of my trial evidence was ignored by the judge and is absent from her judgement. I have read the transcript from the entire 8 days. Twice.
I don’t know what the judge will award these people. But the costs of these proceedings are enormous. So a whopper of a cheque is getting written in the next few days.
I don’t feel sorry for myself at all. I am happy to stand up against woke bullies who hate those they disagree with so much that they will try and destroy your life.
This case is much the same. We are left where the legal position in this country is now that the word racist means nothing. Many times we have asked a judge to define it and every time they have refused. Racist is an important word and we all know what it means.
I know my heart and I know that I don’t care what colour skin someone has. I do however care about what they think, and I will continue to challenge terrible ideas like Critical Race Theory and Gender ideology, which is what I was doing in response to Sainsbury’s offering safe spaces to black employees as part of their desperate bid to jump on the George Floyd bandwagon.
We will ask to appeal today and the judge will deny us, because she is the judge who wrote the judgement, so it wouldn’t make sense for her to accept an appeal.
We then have 21 days to appeal to the court of appeal, which we will do and as I said earlier, seek to right what seems to us to be a serious wrong.
I am lucky. I have a platform I can use to discuss issues which concern lots of people, which others won’t go near. But every day in this country people are losing their jobs from false allegations made by vexatious parties. I will continue to fight for them and for the truth.
Words matter. And this judgement just killed one of the most important in our language, at the same time providing cover for actual racists. I can’t lie down and let that happen, so I must fight on.
We are seeing the courts used maliciously across the west and that is a very concerning trend.
So enjoy the victory guys and I hope it is short lived!