In Nature magazine April 2024 scientists at Germany’s Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research projected that climate change would cause $38 trillion in economic damage EVERY YEAR by 2049 — so an annual economic loss bigger than the US economy.
It also forecast rising CO2 emissions would cause a 62% reduction in global GDP by 2100. Economic damage over the next quarter of a century would exceed the costs of mitigating global warming by six times.
Naturally the global warming grifters and their media cheerleaders jumped on this without the slightest scepticism. The Network for Greening the Financial System, a group of central banks (inc the Fed) and financial regulators, even incorporated the study’s projections into its bank climate stress test scenarios.
But it turned out to be a load of old bollocks (to use a technical term). Nature was issuing corrections within months and in the end discovered so many errors that it has now retracted the whole caboodle. Funny and embarrassing.
So much for peer review, which clearly doesn’t work when the peers all share the same worldview as the authors.
Anyone know how I complain about Nigella Lawson? She made a suggestive comment about licking ice cream on her 2014 show and I’ve just realised it offended me.
Nope, you said what you said and you meant it.
This movie is going to bomb so hard because this chick thinks she’s this social justice, woke, feminist mouthpiece. She’s been nothing but divisive, condescending, and obnoxious ever since the movie went into production. It’s clear she doesn’t want MAGA folks seeing her movie, so we’re going to respect and obey her wishes.
Keep staying woke, Disney… you’re losing money over it and it’s glorious to watch.