Does it make you “far right” to want:
- vetted immigration
- no digital ID
- lower taxes
- no two-tier policing
- free speech
- pedophiles out of office
- lower cost of living
MSM and politicians will call these ladies far right. Does this sound far right to you or just right?
Everyone read and share
Short version:
The Loomer hit piece on Massie comes from a woman who made the exact same allegation against her ex in 2024. Problem: courts threw it out. Zero evidence. She lied
This is a political hit piece meant to steal the election for Miriam Adelson
Before 1850: all milk was raw, drunk by the gallon, and considered medicine.
Before 1900: everyone ate eggs, beef, and butter without a single thought about cholesterol.
Before 1910: every household used salt to preserve meat and fish through the winter.
Before 1920: everything was cooked in tallow, lard, dripping, and butter.
Before 1950: there was no obesity epidemic, no diabetes epidemic, no childhood ADHD diagnosis on every street.
Now consider the timeline.
The seed oils arrived. The margarine arrived. The breakfast cereal arrived. The low-fat yoghurts arrived. The packaged convenience food arrived. The supermarket aisles filled up with products that had no equivalent on a 1900 dinner table.
And the experts are still trying to convince you that chronic disease is caused by the foods that fed humanity for the entire stretch of recorded history.
Not the new arrivals. The old reliables.
Have a think about who benefits from that conclusion.
If you laid 2.4 million years of human evolution across the 24 hours of a clock:
We've been eating red meat for 24 hours.
We've been eating grains for 6 minutes.
We've been eating seed oils for 4 seconds.
And we're being told, with a straight face, that the chronic disease epidemic which appeared in the last 4 seconds is caused by the food we've been eating for the entire 24 hours.
The diseases arrived with the seed oils. The grains. The sugar. The processed convenience food.
The meat was here the whole time. Watching the rest of it move in.
If you trusted "settled science" throughout history, you'd have:
- Drunk radioactive water for vitality (1920s)
- Had your healthy teeth pulled to cure mental illness (1910s)
- Smoked cigarettes for your throat, on doctor's orders (1940s)
- Taken heroin for your child's cough (1890s)
- Eaten lead paint chips as a calcium supplement (decades of this)
- Used asbestos to insulate your child's bedroom (1950s)
- Given thalidomide to pregnant women for morning sickness (1960s)
- Eaten margarine for your heart (1970s)
- Lobotomised your sister for being unhappy (1940s and 50s)
- Sprayed DDT on the children in the playground (1950s)
- Avoided all fat to lose weight (1990s)
- Replaced butter with trans-fat spreads on the doctor's recommendation (1990s)
Every generation has its medical catastrophe dressed up as health advice. Endorsed by the experts. Printed in the textbooks. Recommended by your doctor. Featured on the front of the magazines in the waiting room.
Ours is seed oils, statins, grain-based diets, ultra-processed convenience food, and the steady chemical maintenance of conditions that better food would resolve in 90 days.
Future generations will look back in horror. Just like we look back at radioactive tonics and cigarette prescriptions and wonder how anyone fell for it.
The pattern never changes. Only the product on the shelf.
🚨TRUTH BOMB: Before glyphosate was patented in 1974, autoimmune and digestive disorders were rare. Today every other person has "gut issues." Glyphosate destroys beneficial gut bacteria, derails metabolism, and weakens your immunity. But you were taught to blame gluten so you'd never look at the chemical @Bayer sprays on every grain you eat.
Sunburn rates before 1900: minimal, despite people working outdoors 12 hours a day in fields, on boats, on roofs.
Sunburn rates after 1900: epidemic, despite air conditioning and office cubicles and SPF 50.
What changed? The fat in the food.
Your skin is built from the fats you eat. Saturated fat is stable under UV light. Polyunsaturated fat oxidises rapidly the moment the sun hits it.
Eat seed oils → PUFA gets built into skin cell membranes → UV light strikes unstable fat → oxidation → sunburn.
Eat saturated fat → stable membranes → UV tolerance climbs → natural sun protection from the inside out.
Your great-grandfather worked in fields all day on butter, lard, and dripping. He didn't burn. He didn't reapply anything. He didn't own a hat with a UPF rating.
You eat sunflower oil for 50 weeks of the year, then go to Spain for one and come back looking like a boiled lobster.
The sun hasn't changed. The sun is the same sun.
What changed is your cell membranes. They're now made from industrial fat that combusts under UV exposure like cooking oil left in a hot pan.
Carnivores consistently report dramatically improved sun tolerance. Not because meat contains SPF. Because saturated fat builds UV-resistant skin.
You've been blaming the sun for damage caused by what you ate 18 months ago.
The Patriot Act was sold as a tool to keep us safe, but instead it opened the door to mass government surveillance and the erosion of our civil liberties. It’s time to end these abuses and restore the constitutional rights the Founders intended. The Fourth Amendment must be protected.
They don't ban meat outright. That would be too obvious.
Instead they:
- Price it out through regulation
- Tax it for "the climate"
- Subsidise the alternatives
- Fund the studies that condemn it
- Push plant-based menus in schools
- Restrict where you can buy it
- Shame you for wanting it
Medieval lords used forest law and the gallows.
Modern elites use policy papers and PR campaigns.
The method is softer. The outcome is identical.
The peasants stay weak. The elites stay strong. The meat stays on their plates and off yours.
Go and look at what they eat at Davos. Then look at what's on the school menu. Then tell me it's about the planet.
@Strike@jackmallers@TheBitcoinConf Yeah but my minimum amount jumped from $26k to $51k…what is up with that?! Even $26k was too high. Love you guys but this is a bunch of crap.
This. Is. Terrifying.
This technology should NEVER be allowed to be used.
Ford can fvck right off and so can the Congress members who voted to put this tech in vehicles starting in 2027.
The Amish have been producing raw milk, on the same family farms, from the same breeds of cow, for approximately three hundred years.
No artificial insemination. No hormones. No industrial feed. No antibiotic prophylaxis. The cows eat grass in summer and hay in winter. The milk is in your hand within hours of leaving the cow.
Amish children, by the epidemiological research of the University of Chicago and Johns Hopkins, have substantially lower rates of asthma, eczema, food allergies, and autoimmune disease than the broader American population.
Raw milk is illegal to sell across state lines. It is illegal to sell retail in most states. The FDA has raided Amish dairies in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, armed, seized the milk, destroyed equipment, and prosecuted the farmers.
The enforcement is presented as consumer protection.
The raw milk the FDA is protecting Americans from has a lower documented illness rate than the spinach aisle at any given American supermarket, which has produced multiple national E. coli outbreaks in the last twenty years with no armed federal raids on spinach farms.
A community of religious traditionalists, farming by hand, producing food the way Americans produced food for three hundred years, is being criminalised for continuing to do so.
The consumer is being protected from the option of buying food her great-grandmother considered normal.
A cow, given grass and rain, produces:
Meat. Complete protein, top of the bioavailability table.
Milk. So nutritionally complete we feed it to our young.
Leather. Ten thousand years of footwear. Composts when you're done.
Tallow. Stable cooking fat, soap, candles. Currently being sold back to us as skincare at eight times the butcher's price.
Bones. Broth, tools, fertiliser.
Organs. The most nutrient-dense food on earth, ignored by the culture that buys three supplements to replace them.
Manure. Grows the grass. The cycle runs again.
Try to engineer that. A machine that takes rain and a patch of grass and produces six complete products while improving the soil and reproducing itself.
You can't. We haven't.
We're being told to eliminate them. While flying almonds in from California.
The year is 1950. Your doctor lights a cigarette and tells you smoking is fine. He read it in a study. He is telling the truth about having read it. He does not know, or is not saying, that the study was funded by the tobacco industry.
The year is 1958. Your doctor tells you to eat less fat. The evidence is contested. The contestation is not in the public messaging. The food industry has been helpful in clarifying which findings deserve attention. Some researchers who published contradictory data have been quietly defunded. Ancel Keys is on the cover of Time magazine.
The year is 1962. Your doctor prescribes thalidomide to your pregnant wife for morning sickness. It has been approved. The FDA gave it the green light in Europe. Twelve thousand children will be born with severe limb malformations before anyone in an official capacity acknowledges the problem. The families are told the drug was safe. The drug was approved. Both of these things remain true.
The year is 1972. Your doctor prescribes Valium. Britain is in the grip of a benzodiazepine wave that will last two decades. The dependency risk is known internally. It is not shared. Your doctor is not lying to you. He was not told either.
The year is 1999. Your doctor prescribes Vioxx for your arthritis. It is newer than ibuprofen, well-tolerated, and Merck has a study showing it works. Merck also has internal data suggesting it roughly doubles the risk of heart attack. This data will not reach your doctor for four more years. Fifty thousand people are estimated to have died in the interim. Merck eventually settles for 4.85 billion dollars. No criminal charges are brought.
The year is 2002. Your doctor prescribes OxyContin. Purdue Pharma trained its sales representatives to tell doctors the addiction risk was less than one percent. That figure came from a letter, not a study. The letter was about patients with terminal cancer on short-term doses in hospital settings. Your doctor is a GP with a patient who has a bad back. Nobody draws a distinction. Nobody is required to.
The year is 2008. Your doctor checks your cholesterol. Your LDL is elevated. You are prescribed a statin. Nobody mentions that the number needed to treat for primary prevention is approximately 250. Nobody mentions that the muscle deterioration you'll notice over the next two years is listed as a rare side effect rather than a documented pattern affecting a meaningful percentage of patients. The trial that informed the prescription was funded by the manufacturer.
Now it is today.
Your doctor has new guidelines. New studies. New consensus.
He is confident.
He has always been confident.
The confidence has never been the problem.
The confidence is, in fact, precisely the problem.
In 1900, John D. Rockefeller controlled approximately 90 percent of all petroleum refining in the United States. He was, by some calculations, the richest private individual who had ever lived.
He had a problem. Scientists were discovering that compounds derived from coal tar, a petroleum byproduct, could be used as synthetic medicines. Aspirin, derived from coal tar, had been launched by Bayer in 1899. The petroleum waste stream Rockefeller had previously had to dispose of could now be sold back to the public as medicine at a markup of roughly 10,000 percent.
He had another problem. American medicine in 1900 was a competitive ecosystem of homeopaths, herbalists, naturopaths, osteopaths, midwives, and traditional doctors who used food, plants, water, and lifestyle as the primary tools of healing. Approximately half of all American medical schools taught some form of natural or alternative medicine.
Rockefeller bought into the German pharmaceutical industry, eventually taking a substantial stake in IG Farben, the conglomerate that included Bayer, BASF, and Hoechst. He then commissioned a report.
The report was written by Abraham Flexner, an educator with no medical training, funded by the Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundations, and published in 1910. It declared that natural and alternative medical schools were unscientific quackery. It recommended the closure of more than half of all American medical schools and the standardisation of the rest around medicine based on synthetic patented drugs.
Congress acted. Half of American medical schools closed within a decade. The remainder accepted Rockefeller and Carnegie funding on the condition that their curricula be reorganised around pharmaceutical treatment. Nutrition was removed. Herbal medicine was removed. Lifestyle intervention was removed. The doctor's job was redefined: diagnose the symptom, prescribe the drug.
The drugs were petroleum-derived. The petroleum was supplied by Rockefeller-controlled refineries. The medical schools were funded by Rockefeller. The journals were funded by Rockefeller. The AMA was supported by Rockefeller. The hospitals were funded by Rockefeller.
By 1925, the American medical system was a vertically integrated extension of the petroleum industry, operating under the marketing slogan that it was scientific.
This is the system that exists today.
The pharmaceutical industry generates approximately $1.5 trillion in annual revenue. The American population, 4 percent of the global total, consumes approximately 50 percent of all pharmaceuticals manufactured.
The system was not designed to make people healthy. The system was designed to manage symptoms in a way that produces lifetime customers. A healthy patient is a former customer. A managed patient, who takes the pill every day for the rest of their life, is an annuity.
The objective has always been to keep you in that profitable corridor between healthy and dead.
Long enough to keep buying. Not so well that you stop.
The doctor who advises you to fix your metabolism by changing your diet is, from the point of view of the system that trained him, a defective product. The doctor who prescribes you a statin, a metformin, an antidepressant, and a blood pressure medication for life is performing exactly as designed.
The system was designed by an oil baron who needed to sell the waste products of his refineries.
It still functions, 116 years after the Flexner Report, exactly the way he designed it.
You are the customer.
The corridor is where you live.
They attacked wool. We got polyester.
Half a million tonnes of microplastic fibres enter the ocean from synthetic clothing annually.
Microplastics are now in human blood, lung tissue, and placentas.
Wool biodegrades in months.
Polyester persists for centuries.
They attacked leather. We got PVC.
PVC production releases dioxins.
The vegan leather peels within two years.
Both require petroleum.
Leather is a byproduct of food production.
It lasts decades.
It biodegrades.
The ethical alternative requires an oil well.
They attacked butter. We got margarine.
Trans fat disease for a generation.
Now on its third formulation.
Butter contains vitamins A, D, E, and K2.
Margarine contains seed oils and an ingredients list.
The butter never changed.
The butter never needed to.
They attacked beef. We got plant-based burgers.
Pea protein extracted with hexane.
Seed oils. Nineteen other ingredients. A supply chain across multiple continents.
Soy driving deforestation in Brazil at a scale that dwarfs British cattle farming.
Beef on British marginal land grows on hills that cannot grow crops.
Sequesters carbon. Fertilises without a factory.
Complete protein. Every fat-soluble vitamin. No dead zone.
In every case: the traditional animal product was nutritionally superior, environmentally lighter, and cheaper to produce.
In every case: the ethical replacement was industrially complex, petrochemically dependent, and worse for the body using it.
The ethics were the marketing.
What is happening right now with Bayer and Monsanto at the Supreme Court is the same story we have been telling about vaccines for twenty years, and it is playing out again in real time.
They are losing billions in lawsuits because their pesticides are causing non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. So instead of making a safer product, they are asking the government for liability protection. And our own Department of Justice is helping them make that case.
This is exactly what happened with vaccines. The manufacturers were losing money over death and injury. The government didn't say go back and fix it. They said we will protect you. And now an entire generation of children is living with the consequences of that decision, with no legal recourse for their families.
I trust Bobby Kennedy and the work he is doing, but we are watching complications inside this administration and I think people need to pay attention to this one. I can't imagine anyone walking down the street wants to give pesticide companies a free ride when their product is causing cancer and poisoning our children.
Who is more likely to spread the pertussis bacterium (aka, whooping cough)—those vaccinated or those unvaccinated? The reality (see FDA, industry, and pharma scientists sources below) is that it is the vaccinated.
Why? Two reasons.
First, those vaccinated are less likely to have symptoms if infected with the pertussis bacterium but the bacterium still multiplies in their nasopharynx and they then unknowingly spreading it to others (instead of showing symptoms and knowing to isolate). Not science fiction—the hard cold facts as detailed below.
Second, and this makes the reality even worse, because after an unvaccinated person has been infected with pertussis (and is more likely to have symptoms and stay in bed) that person won’t get infected again for at least many years – but the vaccinated individual can become infected over, and over, and over again with the pertussis bacterium because of the defective immunity this vaccine generates.
But don’t worry, legacy media, no doubt won’t let the facts stand in the way of their hyperbolic reporting. They will blindly, like religious adherents, seek to blame, persecute, and shame those who do not inject this product instead of facing the reality: those vaccinated are more likely to spread this pathogen.
If you don’t agree with the foregoing, take it up with the FDA, industry scientists, infectious diseases societies, and the hard cold data and science:
- As the FDA explained in 2024: “aP [acellular pertussis] containing vaccines induce helper T cells (TH2) memory and neutralizing antibody responses that effectively prevent symptomatic disease but fail to prevent colonization and carriage.” https://t.co/edFIT8uztw
- As those considered the world's leading pertussis vaccine experts, pharma consultants, and infectious disease societies explained in a consensus paper on pertussis vaccine in 2019: “Natural infection evokes both mucosal and systemic immune responses, while aPVs [acellular pertussis vaccines] induce only a systemic immune response. … Mucosal immunity is essential to prevent colonization and transmission of B. pertussis organisms. Consequently, preventive measures such as aPVs that do not induce a valid mucosal response can prevent disease but cannot avoid infection and transmission. … aPV pertussis vaccines do not prevent colonization. Consequently, they do not reduce the circulation of B. pertussis and do not exert any herd immunity effect.” https://t.co/nlLg6dr30h They also explained that: “Lack of mucosal immune responses after aPV administration favor infection, persistent colonization, and transmission of the pathogen.”
- https://t.co/oYIE4wacTu (“That vaccination does not prevent B. pertussis infection in humans, nor the circulation of the organism in human populations in any important manner, comes from the observation that the inter-epidemic intervals have not changed in a major way since the implementation of mass vaccination.”); https://t.co/aleEKXMQL2 (“Because of linked-epitope suppression, all children who were primed by DTaP vaccines will be more susceptible to pertussis throughout their lifetimes, and there is no easy way to decrease this increased lifetime susceptibility.”).
For a detailed discussion with many more citations and irrefutable evidence, see Chapter 9 of Vaccines, Amen.