Appreciated the opportunity w/ @BrookingsEd to frame my work w/ @MatthewAKraft on the landscape of GYO programs for a policy & general audience
A few key takeaways about this increasingly popular solution to teacher workforce challenges:
https://t.co/clPQJaJfQb
My paper with @MatthewAKraft describing the variety of Grow Your Own teacher programs nationally is in print in @ERjournal_AERA !
EdResearcher: https://t.co/lh08QF9FSi
Open Access: https://t.co/2wjhbffNs7
On this #TakeawayTuesday, we highlight "Another One Rides the Bus: The Impact of School Bus Transportation on School Choice.," by Danielle Sanderson Edwards.
Link: https://t.co/Rv3hEkJe6W
@aefpweb
Grow Your Own: An Umbrella Term for Very Different Localized Teacher Pipeline Programs is out in @ERjournal_AERA !
https://t.co/lh08QF9FSi
@MatthewAKraft & I explore how the term GYO is used, describe GYO program variation, & examine alignment btwn GYO purposes & programming 🧵
Future research: We need to know what types of GYO programs are effective at improving the many outcomes associated w/ them. I contributed to a research agenda that outlines possible research questions & data needed to evaluate GYOs
https://t.co/QGCACmtgej
Excited to share @NewAmerica Grow Your Own (GYO) Teacher Research Agenda I wrote w/ Amaya Garcia Brad Carl Conra Gist Jason Greenberg Motamedi Jenny Seelig & Roey Ahram! We know little about the effectiveness of GYO programs. We need more research!
https://t.co/xbcAPprWMs...
To remedy this, we outline important research questions & the specific data we need to evaluate them. We hope GYO programs, district & prep program leaders, & funders use this research agenda to inform their data collection & evaluation efforts!
GYO programs are difficult to study. They’re small size, their effects take years to observe plus we need for connected data across institutions & a good comparison group to study them.
🚨JUST RELEASED🚨
New @REACHCenterEd policy brief from me & Kaitlin Anderson. Paper published in AERA Open
https://t.co/Z5cXzH6c1B
We estimate the effects of interdistrict choice & charter schl enrollment on btwn & within district racial & economic segregation 1/12
Conclusion: choice is not good or bad. Choice is used by relatively disadv. Ss. There are positive fx of urban charters & interdist. choice on student achievement. Unregulated choice is just not a viable strategy for reducing segregation. 11/12