Jawad Rasool

Retweets are not endorsements
. No place of hatred in life

[Jawad Rasool @Drjawad79]

@mamashami2 Lol

[Jawad Rasool @Drjawad79]

@ahmadwaraichh Lol

[Jawad Rasool @Drjawad79]

@lfc009666 Looks like system wanted Argentina to win

[Jawad Rasool @Drjawad79]

@JonErlichman Indian contestant not included

[Jawad Rasool @Drjawad79]

@KhawajaMAsif You are in the gov. Not sure if you know that

[Jawad Rasool @Drjawad79]

@DanQayyum Looks like you used minimal oil

[Jawad Rasool @Drjawad79]

@antifatwa Legend

[Jawad Rasool @Drjawad79]

@abdulslam2017 @TurgayEvren1 He forgot to mention pakistanis

[Jawad Rasool @Drjawad79]

@waqas464 We need to show this kindness to each other as well.

[Jawad Rasool @Drjawad79]

@DanQayyum Waseem Akram

[Jawad Rasool @Drjawad79]

@Rainmaker1973 It will take one strike from a hostile nation

[Handre @Handre]

Two small island economies blew up in 2008. Iceland and Ireland. Their names differ by one letter, and their handling of the crisis differed by everything that matters.

Iceland's three big banks, Kaupthing, Landsbanki, and Glitnir, had grown assets to roughly ten times the country's GDP by 2008. Pure credit-fueled madness. When the music stopped, the Icelandic government did the unthinkable: it let them fail. Bondholders ate the losses. The state refused to socialize private bank debt onto 320,000 citizens who never signed up for it. Capital controls went up, the króna collapsed, and the politicians actually prosecuted bankers. Twenty-six of them went to prison. Sigurður Einarsson and Hreiðar Már Sigurðsson, the men who ran Kaupthing, served real sentences.

Ireland took the opposite road. In September 2008, the Irish government issued a blanket guarantee covering the liabilities of its major banks, including Anglo Irish Bank, a property-lending casino that should have been allowed to die in peace. The taxpayer absorbed the bill. By the time the rescue ended, Ireland had poured around 64 billion euros into its banks, roughly 40 percent of GDP. The state took on private gambling debts, then went to the Troika in 2010 hat in hand for an 85 billion euro bailout, and accepted years of austerity to pay for losses it had no business owning.

Both economies recovered. Both eventually grew again. The difference is who paid and who learned. Iceland made creditors and reckless bankers bear the consequences of their own decisions, which is the entire point of capitalism: profit and loss, not profit and bailout. Ireland protected the people who made the bad bets and handed the invoice to schoolteachers and shopkeepers.

You will hear economists call Ireland's GDP rebound a triumph (much of that "growth" is multinational accounting fiction, Leprechaun economics, but that's another lesson). What they skip is the moral architecture. When you guarantee bank liabilities, you abolish the discipline that makes markets work. You tell every banker in the country that downside is optional.

Iceland jailed its bankers. Ireland reimbursed theirs.

[Jawad Rasool @Drjawad79]

@MohUmair87 Laanat

[Jawad Rasool @Drjawad79]

@abdulslam2017 Should more like shallow threat

[Jawad Rasool @Drjawad79]

@ahmadwaraichh This script is so old

[Jawad Rasool @Drjawad79]

@tparsi They should either play matches in Mexico or bycot the American matches . Why would they let American treat them like that

[Jawad Rasool @Drjawad79]

@AmmadYousaf Thanks for sharing an information that matters . Tv broadcast run 24/7 . Hardly ever they talk about issues that matter

[Murray Rothbard @MurraySuggests]

The Iranian navy, which has been destroyed eight times, has apparently closed the Strait of Hormuz again, because the United States, for the seventh time, won the war that wasn’t a war, so now the United States has to open the Strait of Hormuz that was already open before the not-war began.

The not-war began because Iran had uranium that was totally, completely, beautifully obliterated, so they can’t build the nuclear bomb they weren’t building, which is why the United States had to start the not-war it definitely didn’t start.

Now the United States, which has nuclear weapons, is threatening to use nuclear weapons to stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons, because nuclear weapons are far too dangerous for countries with nuclear weapons to allow other countries to have.

If the United States saw the United States doing what the United States does in other countries, the United States would invade the United States to liberate the United States from the tyranny of the United States.

[Jawad Rasool @Drjawad79]

@Partisangirl Is it new epstein island ?

[Jawad Rasool @Drjawad79]

@DanQayyum @bee_asks @Farhan2IT That article should be taught in schools.