@zeeg Nope. Confirmed here. We reverted back to 4.6 with 4.7 for development. So far "I don't like" 4.8, but it's very productive so I haven't reverted.
The harness improvements we made to make 4.7 align with our platform charter have held through 4.8. Opus 4.5 is the gold standard.
@Jaytel Interestingly enough, 4.7 in a heavily tuned harness is inoffensive. The migration (I won't call it an upgrade) from 4.6 to 4.7 required considerable tuning. Made the harness much better though. That's the only benefit I've seen so far with 4.7.
GPT-image-2 benchmarks higher than Nano Banana 2, but my testing doesn't back up real output. It's an order of magnitude better in terms of quality, speed, and ease of use.
I've been building something that solves real pain we're all experiencing working across teams with AI today. I'd love to see if it aligns with your experience.
Ghostty is leaving GitHub. I'm GitHub user 1299, joined Feb 2008. I've visited GitHub almost every single day for over 18 years. It's never been a question for me where I'd put my projects: always GitHub. I'm super sad to say this, but its time to go. https://t.co/DQDemHdytV
I've been working on something really cool with @SaraD , which you'll hear a LOT MORE very soon. We'd love to hear your feedback on how AI fits into your current workflow.
Please retweet for reach. ๐ฑ
https://t.co/pncjUXGKBJ ๐ฟ
@quincymitch These days we're all handing each our team members work that's been touched by AI. I've found that sharing both provenance and process aids in the shared understanding of the outcomes we're trying to achieve.
I think AI is making individuals faster but teams messier.
What do you think? 2-min survey.
DM me if you want a copy of the results. ๐
https://t.co/pncjUXGKBJ