@pampakes82@AndrewYang No. Too much hinges on the incredibly stupid decision to go down to the time slowed planet....... They really should have known better! Don't like when plot hinges on stupidity.
@noself86@ValerioCapraro Do they actually claim that humans have some internal representation of what is true? That sounds bonkers to me. It’s all stories, both for humans and llms.
@TheExpanseVerse@TheCinesthetic Well, plus Bobby and Drummer for sure. Naomi and Elvi not bad either, more so in books following the series perhaps. Just shows Avasarala was no accident. :)
If y'all are curious what the co-founder and CEO of Anthropic, Dario Amodei, would've done in 1933 if Hitler had asked him to make his technology compatible for the Nazi government to gather surveillance on German citizens... you now have your answer. Amodi is an American hero.
I’ve just upgraded to the $200/m plan for Anthropic and cancelled my OpenAI plans.
Let’s get Anthropic to move to Europe while we’re at it.
LFG Anthropic.
Everyone’s saying OpenAI got the “same deal” Anthropic was banned for.
Read the fine print. They’re not the same:
On weapons:
Anthropic asked for “no fully autonomous weapons without human oversight” = a human involved in the decision.
OpenAI’s deal says “human responsibility for the use of force” = someone accountable, which can happen after the fact.
Oversight ≠ Responsibility. One requires a human before the trigger. The other requires a name on the paperwork after.
On surveillance:
Dario said explicitly: current law hasn’t caught up with AI. The government can already buy your movement data, browsing history, etc without a warrant. AI can assemble that into a complete picture of your life, at scale. That’s mass surveillance without breaking a single law.
Anthropic wanted protections beyond current law.
OpenAI’s deal says the Pentagon “reflects them in law and policy.” That’s existing law as the safeguard, the exact law Anthropic said is insufficient.
Same words. Different agreements. Read them carefully
@DustinL29447583@SalvinValkyries They could just continue the series in 30 years. 😁 I do think there was some comment that it was a “natural pause” and they did include setup for continuation. So who knows.
@esrtweet "We are dreamers, shapers, singers, and makers. We study the mysteries of laser and circuit, crystal and scanner, holographic demons and invocations of equations. These are the tools we employ, and we know many things."
https://t.co/ll7LnBQS6o
@simonw Those of us who work with education are talking a lot about this, and have been for some time. It's back to basics, oral examination, live discussions and written (digital) supervised tests. Impossible to prohibit AI for completing assignments etc., but you can test without it.
@A_y_u_s_h_i_X @deredleritt3r@GaryMarcus@FT What's the definition of "hallucination" you're using here? This seems at least quite advanced - it's not ungrounded fantasy but an error with incomplete grounding. You could say all argument and reasoning is on a spectrum there.
Beware of any Christian movement that demands the government be an instrument of God's wrath but never a source of God's charity, mercy, or compassion.