Duckie

need to stop opening this app..

[Duckie @duckulaura]

@empalmer79 @hell_line0 I’m sorry you have to deal with that and I’ve had periods like that too unfortunately. From their post it doesn’t sound like they care about bleeding, just the smell. The only person who should be able to smell your period is you

[Duckie @duckulaura]

@SpooknJukes I’m so sad we were all forced to stay with our eyes glued to our screen for 13 hours straight with no bathroom or food breaks… sighhhhh

[Duckie @duckulaura]

@ChefThiccie @SpooknJukes Its 17 Is America, 18 in some other places and 16 in my country and a few others. Regardless, 17 is still a minor and it shouldn’t be the fault of the minor for playing a game if they are included in adult communities BY the adults. Thats if the adults know of their age

[Duckie @duckulaura]

@ShreksBelly @arishiined Wait they deleted their comment what’d it say

[Duckie @duckulaura]

@Letsgocaterpie @Mr_Zantastic Genuinely whaaaat are you talking about

[Duckie @duckulaura]

@BabtouEnerve @AWildG00s3 @SpooknJukes I mean there are survivor perks to counter it if everyone’s running it. I’m a survivor main and think it’d be fun

[Duckie @duckulaura]

@ezzxyz @SpooknJukes As opposed to the survivors taking hits after unhooking and getting 4 out? Yeah alright lolll

[Duckie @duckulaura]

@NerdySnailie @SpooknJukes As a survivor main, if we get an anticamp feature, the killer should also have an advantage for us sticking around in endgame. Both of those things punish players for doing something they don’t need to do. Even then sometimes camping and tunneling on killer is needed to get kills

[Duckie @duckulaura]

@ucantspoofatpm @theclowndbdwife @Neco_ArcChaos I have over 1.5k hours on survivor and if you need windows to work out where things are then you’re just bad. You can’t call anyone else bad

[Duckie @duckulaura]

@JesseBlazey @theclowndbdwife I’m not but as a survivor main, it’s very hypocritical to run windows and a 2nd chance perk like deadhard, then call people bad in endgame when they didn’t do anything wrong

[Duckie @duckulaura]

@DVDfever @SkilawAI @ScalingStories1 @TeamYouTube @YouTube @YouTubeCreators @nealmohan @UpdatesFromYT It’s THEIR voice

[Duckie @duckulaura]

@soyyy_fercha @burryishere I’ve experienced it and this is still rpe… it might not be your exact experience but it is still is. You don’t decide who is a victim of it and who doesn’t count.

[Duckie @duckulaura]

@ChaaVoom @PlantChaotic @ScalingStories1 @TeamYouTube @YouTube @YouTubeCreators @nealmohan @UpdatesFromYT Then why are other channels monetized when they do the same thing?

[Duckie @duckulaura]

@PattyRevac777 @GOP__Ls If they came out with a way for men to become pregnant and carry a child, would you carry them for women instead?

[Duckie @duckulaura]

@DailyEpistle @GOP__Ls So you’re allowed to dip your dick wherever you want them disappear, but it’s YOUR choice what happens with the baby? It’s your job to use a condom, not the woman’s.

[Duckie @duckulaura]

@PlantChaotic @ItachiSpecial @ScalingStories1 @TeamYouTube @YouTube @YouTubeCreators @nealmohan @UpdatesFromYT I’m confused as to which part you’re referring to when you mention ChatGPT. The posts are found by Scaling, the footage in the background recorded by them, and they use their own voice

[Duckie @duckulaura]

@CryptoG92 @ScalingStories1 @TeamYouTube @YouTube @YouTubeCreators @nealmohan @UpdatesFromYT Scaling is on Spotify!

[ScalingStories @ScalingStories1]

Hello @YouTube @TeamYouTube @YouTubeCreators,
I’m sorry to keep tagging you, but I believe my channel was falsely flagged for inauthentic content, and I am requesting assistance from a real human/specialist to manually review it.

I already tried appealing with a video explaining and showcasing my work behind the scenes, including webcam footage to show that I am a real and genuine creator. However, that appeal video still has 0 views, yet the appeal was ruled as confirmed inauthentic content. I believe this may have been done automatically by AI, and I urgently need a manual review by a real person.

Every video on my channel is voiced by me. All gameplay footage was also recorded by me. I provide significant commentary in my videos that adds entertainment and educational value. I also use numerous custom avatars to represent myself during talking segments and to express different emotions and tones to my viewers. None of my videos are mass-produced or repetitive. My viewers can clearly tell that each video is different.

I understand that you receive a large number of appeals and requests every day, and I am simply trying my best to be noticed as well by creating this post.

My channel: https://t.co/rfIa8AXk0M

[Duckie @duckulaura]

@TeamYouTube @ScalingStories1 Did Scaling so dirty with this one. Free my dude he did nothing wrong!!!!

[ScalingStories @ScalingStories1]

Hello @YouTube @YouTubeCreators @TeamYouTube,
I am requesting that a real person or specialist review my channel’s partnership program status after I was recently denied monetization. I was cited for “inauthentic content,” which is described as: “Content that appears mass-produced or repetitive to increase views without adding significant educational or other value.”

My content is not mass-produced or repetitive to increase views, and it does add significant commentary, entertainment, and educational value. My videos are voiced by me and manually edited in DaVinci Resolve, which takes me around 5–7 hours a day. The gameplay is also played by me. I also use several custom-drawn avatars to better represent myself during my talking segments throughout my videos, helping me better express the emotions I am feeling and trying to convey to my viewers.

The only repetitive elements in my content are my intros and outros, which are allowed under your guidelines. Your guidelines state: “Examples of what is allowed to monetize, including but not limited to: Same intro and outro for your videos, but the bulk of your content is different.”

I explained all of this in my appeal video, which was said to be reviewed by a human reviewer. However, the appeal video is unlisted and still shows a view count of 0. Because of this, I do not believe anyone watched my video, yet my appeal was still denied and my content was confirmed as “inauthentic.”

I am being denied the chance to reapply to the YouTube Partner Program until July 27, 2026. That is not right or fair to me. I was previously removed from the program on January 27, 2026. During that time, I thoroughly reviewed my own channel and overhauled it, which included changing my format and deleting videos that may not align with the program’s policies. I spent three months, from January 27, 2026, to April 27, 2026, rebuilding my channel.

To be denied again for the same policy, “inauthentic content,” after I followed your guidelines and made sure my videos do not violate them, is soul-crushing. I believe my channel was not properly reviewed and may have been evaluated by AI. I am requesting that a real person or specialist speak with me and review my channel, as I am a genuine, passionate content creator who wants to be part of your program.

My channel: https://t.co/rb32nUNgtM