@femaxxnews@buckeyebettie Yeah, telling me I haven't thought it all the way through...
Tell me, how do you harvest sperm if you do not involve males?
Food for thought. Enjoy your delusions, they clearly make you into a very cheerful and loving person.
@femaxxnews@buckeyebettie Yeah, it's very delusional.
Women are indeed a vital part of creating more babies.
But eggs do not turn into infants on their own. Women do not "make the people". Women are the oven, but they cannot make the dough alone.
And this is what makes you are a deluded idealogue.
@sisudonym@CathyYoung63 Because it does? Women socialize very differently and it creates this situation where they are more vulnerable to social contagions.
@sisudonym@CathyYoung63 - me, pointing this out
- you, either believing the fallacy or misunderstanding the context, attempting make this about "comprehension" when it is about reasoning.
@sisudonym@CathyYoung63 Great. You don't even know what I said.
Reading comprehension is about parsing and interpreting the text, like
- a tweet about the dangers of women
- a sarcastic response that fails to understand that men exhibiting the danger doesn't alter the truthfulness of the danger
@buttsemen@JoeDaActivist What, cuz you called him a poopoo head?
The only misinformation he spread is the "walking" part. That bitch is in a wheelchair.
@Miskruier@ArgenTo46@alyssa_muysken If by "does not bother them" you mean "didn't make it into the news and so they just go about their lives without ever knowing it happened" then I totally agree with you.
@KaeleyT Isn't it amazing? We can have men do all that dumb shit and still men will be a better choice than you.
I will give you a simple reason why: when that guy in charge does all that dumb shit? The rest of us kill him.
@AntoVoidance@eyethehorizon@emeriticus I mean, for one, the burden of proof and the threshold for insanity in Iowa are completely different.
For another, he had 3/3 expert testimonials asserting his mental infirmity.
And also, he didn't have a million-dollar fanclub.
@aleksil79@anielizarmly@BicycleSocials Well, your question is a great example. What is the purpose of debating whether she "could have" acted differently if nobody can ever actually influence their own behaviors?