@globepolitics That implies the government setting the mandate and duration , otherwise what is there to announce? Who would take that on without being involved in both?
@acoyne Same fact base. Different narratives and framing. Replicated throughout CdnPoli today. Reflects the journalistic need to provide conclusions about the meaning of even transient events
@MAAWLAW@TheHerleBurly Strange distinction. I would have thought putting this in a context of a healthy democracy clearly implied truthful content commonly shared. Calling this arrogant is puzzling. Where suppressing dissent comes into it is baffling. This sounds partisan not analytical.
@cselley i get that point. Makes scheduling really difficult. But in this case, they cut away to the Raptors. Understand it was newsworthy at some level but they kept with it for a virtual eternity as they showed SILENT pictures of the VW speeches in a split screen
Amazing editorial decision at CBC News Network. Two governments announce a $13 billion investment and the CBC carries 30 minutes of a Toronto Raptors news conference instead.
@cwaddell27 @KeithBoag@PierrePoilievre ...2 when the Mulroney government objected to our Meech Lake coverage and tried to have me removed , CBC management rebuffed the pressure. I continued in the job for another three years
@cwaddell27 @KeithBoag@PierrePoilievre I was CBC TV parliamentary Bureau chief from 1977 to 1993 through the emergence of the PQ, the constitutional patriation, the free trade debate and election and the Meech Lake and Charlottetown processes. I was never given editorial instructions directly or indirectly by govt...2
@acoyne It s not the information about costs that s the problem, it s the media propensity to assign negative news framing to certain costs as a class of spending regardless of context.
@cselley@nationalpost Not mad just disappointed. I was a loyal subscriber but stopped a while ago. There is just too much over the top, preachy writing that unfortunately is predictable and relentlessly provocative.