@kings_muse 100% coming to that realization. Love Keegan, but what it comes down to is trading what we THINK Keegan can be to what Lauri currently is AND can be. Not an easy decision at all, but could be a necessary one.
@akashanav I keep seeing that these deals create the potential for “cap hell” in the coming years but, as someone not well versed in such, how is that the case? It reads as if basically instead of paying players in the future against the cap, they’re just shelling out cash now instead?
Ok Kings fans, I will be doing a giveaway for 2 tickets to Game 2 of the first round.
3 things you have to do to enter:
-Follow me
-Retweet
-Like
I will pick a winner on April 13th, good luck!
@StatsOnFire Realistically, the 9ers are still in the perfect position to give Trey a chunk of games to gauge development. There’s talent everywhere, the division is garbage so playoffs should be a given and if he doesn’t work out, Purdy is waiting in the wings.
@Josiah__Dev Purdy and Lance obviously aren’t better than Lamar. But is the team better if you add Lamar and subtract Bosa, limit your ability to extend Aiyuk and lose a possible 1st round stud on a rookie contract? That’s the real question here.
@ryanghensley @Steph49K Yea that AZ game was weird. Looked as if they weren’t comfortable opening up the full playbook for him yet. Hoping that the Hou, Chi and Sea starts are more the norm (minus the whole monsoon and shattering ankle part…)
@bandit22479@JNay_LSS @AScheftberger This is the line I’m in. I don’t disagree with the initial premise money and impact wise, it’s do-able. But I simply don’t believe that Lamar w/o Bosa is a clear net + over Lance/Purdy w/ Bosa
@49erscast1@johnny171938631 Do you think we’d win a Super Bowl if were unable to extend our DPOY Bosa and Aiyuk? I’d rather have an extended window with the possibility of multiple rings than go through what the Rams are doing now.