Bees

[Furiosa @Furiosa24]

Oh that’s better!

I am cleansed!

💗💗💗💗💗💗💗

[Hanz @fashionistaera]

The media trying to create drama coz
Catherine’s ex bf, Rupert Finch was at the wedding.👀

She is very good friends with his wife, Lady Natasha Rufus Isaacs, who is the co-founder of the brand ‘Beulah London’, which she has worn multiple times.

Time to show some class media!🙄

[Bees @ebet377]

#GBNewsRubbish

[Hanz @fashionistaera]

The media trying to create drama coz
Catherine’s ex bf, Rupert Finch was at the wedding.👀

She is very good friends with his wife, Lady Natasha Rufus Isaacs, who is the co-founder of the brand ‘Beulah London’, which she has worn multiple times.

Time to show some class media!🙄

[TomiLola @TomiLolaMoments]

For someone who always wears a serious look, it is quite heartening that Princess Anne lets down her guards at her son's wedding. She looks incredibly happy in these photos. She should smile and laugh more; they look good on her.

[Princess of Wales News @HRHPWales]

The Princess of Wales 🤍

[Queen Esther @XOQueenEsther]

What a lovely bond between Catherine and Charlotte. The way Charlotte looks at her mother, the shared smiles, the little moments of affection and understanding, so full of love. ♥️

You can see a young girl who adores her mother and a mother who is clearly devoted to her daughter.

Then there’s Meghan Markle with her daughter at her feet and under the table, using her to promote products. That child deserves better.

[opinionated russian🇷🇺☦️ @Katsbigopinion2]

Harry, your wife were a maternity dress to someone else’s wedding before it was confirmed that she was pregnant. You and your wife left the royal family and got stripped and quit working life and then you went to America and trashed your entire family in documentary interviews

[Sabirah Lohn 💕🦕🦖 @SabirahLohn]

Three videos on hello instagram of the Princess of Wales are over 150 million views. The one of her at the wedding two days ago has already hit 30 million views.

[🎩Laird of the Manor🎩 @LairdOfThManor]

Elegance, thou has a name…
It is Catherine.
💙🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇦🇺👑

[Prince William's Jaw🎈 @bornfirstkindly]

The future Queen.

[Harry, Meghan’s Spare @ViQueenie]

The difference between Catherine, Princess of Wales and Meghan Markle couldn’t be more obvious.

Catherine serves quietly. Meghan performs loudly.

Catherine doesn’t spend her life chasing headlines. Meghan is unable to function without them.

Catherine avoids controversy. Meghan creates it.

Catherine doesn’t leak every private moment to the press. Meghan turns every moment into a People Magazine exclusive.

Catherine’s reputation is built on years of duty, discretion and consistency. Meghan’s public image is built on perpetual drama, contradictions and controversy. One lets her work speak for itself. The other never stops talking about herself.

That’s the difference.

#PrincessCatherine #MeghanMarkle

[Queen Esther @XOQueenEsther]

When Just Meghan Markle Isn’t Enough.

One of the funniest examples of media manipulation is how they constantly refer to Catherine as “Kate Middleton” while bending over backwards to call Meghan “the Duchess of Sussex” in every other sentence.

What makes it so amusing is that “Kate Middleton” still outshines “The Duchess of Sussex.”

Catherine doesn’t need a title to be recognised, admired, respected, or loved. Call her Kate Middleton, Catherine, Princess of Wales, or future Queen - people know exactly who she is.

Meanwhile, the endless insistence on “Duchess of Sussex” for Meghan, despite her no longer being a working royal and despite years of attacking the institution that granted the title, creates the opposite impression. It proves that “Meghan Markle” alone isn’t enough to carry the headline.

Catherine never has to lean on hers. However, Meghan Markle needs HRH on a gift basket sent to a so called friend and “Meghan, Duchess of Sussex” announced when a journalist arrives for an interview, despite there reportedly being only two people there.

Talk about overcompensating. 🤭

That constant need to attach the title to everything doesn’t make her seem more important. It highlights how little standalone impact “Meghan Markle” actually has.

And to everyone who claims to hate the monarchy while insisting on calling her “The Duchess of Sussex” at every opportunity, thanks for proving the point. If titles are so meaningless and outdated, why cling to this one so desperately?

The truth is, you’re not promoting Meghan Markle. You’re promoting the title. And in doing so, you’re highlighting exactly how much of the appeal is tied to being a Duchess rather than simply being Meghan Markle.

I understand the frustration. She’ll never be the future Queen. But the constant reliance on the title only reinforces what many of you are trying so hard to deny: Meghan Markle alone isn’t enough.

[Princess CarParkle 👑 @unreMARKLEble]

I just can’t. This is the weakest, lamest excuse for exploiting your kids that I’ve ever seen. The only way to keep your children safe online? Don’t post them online. Hiding their faces means nothing when you’re posting their full bodies and side views.
I’m not a public figure and my kids are grown. But when they were younger I NEVER EVER publicly posted my children on social media. Not the backs of their heads, not in my profile pic-nothing. I did have password protected and family only albums for family out of state but even then I knew putting images of kids into the public internet arena was a bad idea. Things are even worse now-#MeghanMarkle can pretend she’s “sharing family moments” but we all know she’s merely driving traffic to her IG. She knows when she posts pics of the kids it makes news articles and the photos are broadcasted globally. That’s an advocate for children’s internet safety, y’all. Contributing to the “public health crisis”.

Just say that you’re going to use your daughter to promote your business. Just say “Rules for thee but not for me”. Just say it drives the traffic you need to your business. Just say it gives you the attention you crave.

She’s put herself in a pickle though-because by insisting on titles for the kids before they turned 18 (which would have been the most fair and responsible choice. They don’t live in the UK, they have no roles in the Monarchy. Let them decide.) she and Harry have made them public figures. So be controlled-once a year release photos of them, Christmas or birthdays, and the rest of the time stop posting them in their pajamas, barefoot, disheveled & unkempt-or to promote your failing business. Or don’t-keep being a raging hypocrite and serve them up on platters for the internet to consume. #HarryandMeghan did that-unnecessarily made them public figures, so handle it correctly. #MeghanIsTheProblem #MeghanMarkleIsAHypocrite

[Summer Belle @SummerRhapsody]

#MeghanMarkle as a
Daughter = failed
Royal = failed
Wife = failed
Mother = failed
Actress = failed
Podcaster = failed
Influencer = failed
Entrepreneur = failed
Humanitarian = failed
Advocate for women & young girls = failed
Advocate for mental health = failed.

[🎩Laird of the Manor🎩 @LairdOfThManor]

I find this whole ‘Sidley Twins’ scenario an absolute hoot!
I abhor bully’s and with the rate they are going at blocking anyone who is even remotely associated with @MeghansMole or @insiderlauren there won’t be anyone left on X to engage with!
Anyhoo… I thought HRH the Princess of Wales looked stunning at Peter Phillips and Harriet Sperlings wedding, what did you think?💙🎩

[Blu Ivy @IvyRoseBlu]

Princess Anne, Princess Royal departs after attending the Royal wedding of Peter Phillips and Harriet Sperling at All Saints' Church on June 06, 2026 in Kemble, England.

(Photo by Karwai Tang/WireImage)

[The Crown Edit @Thecrownedit]

Zara always manages to look stunningly beautiful 💙

[Tumi 🌸 @tumiyukii]

Unfortunately @paulamatanovich I don’t have the group chat info or I’d post it myself, but you help literally everyone and anyone. Even when I had 5k followers you treated me with respect 🫡 no matter WHAT it’s not ok to sleep with a married man or anyone in a relationship!!!

[Bees @ebet377]

#MalevolentNarcissistMeghanMarkle

[GraceKelly1952, unapologetically conservative @kelly1952]

@XOQueenEsther She could never have had all of that, because of the giant "Me First" filter implanted in her brain that governs all that she does. She is incapable of putting anyone ahead of herself.

[Queen Esther @XOQueenEsther]

Meghan Markle could have had all of this.
If she’d just accepted that the Crown wasn’t there to serve her, but that she was there to serve something much bigger than herself, she could have become one of the most significant royals in modern times.

Coming from Hollywood, she had a front row seat to the exact world she was so desperate to impress. After years of chasing status in those circles, she found herself in a position where the very people she desperately wanted validation from would have been standing when she walked into the room because of the institution she represented.

The thing she never got is that the respect isn’t for the individual. It’s for the Crown, the role, and the centuries of service behind it. Those who understand that thrive. Those who think they’re bigger than it? They crash and burn.

A few years ago, when the monarchy was under real pressure and Catherine was fighting serious health issues, Harry and Meghan had a genuine chance to step up and build something positive. Instead they chose to wage war on the very institution that gave them their platform in the first place.

They wanted the prominence without the protocol, the status without the hierarchy, and the influence without any accountability.

The saddest part is Meghan couldn’t accept playing second fiddle to Catherine. In the end, refusing to accept her place in the institution is exactly what cost her the platform she had inside it.

Pride really has undone a lot of people. And it might end up being the defining lesson of Meghan Markle’s whole story.