ShinyHunters compromised Canvas (to a currently unknown extent) which resulted in a "this system has been compromised" to over 9,000 universities.
As ridiculous as that sounds, I'm not memeing. It has been speculated it is actually over 9,000 universities.
ShinyHunters is having their ALPHV moment. They're now going to get attention at a serious scale outside of the information security circle.
After not receiving a raise in the four years Iโve worked at BHIS theyโve now decided to reduce my pay by $40k after coming back from maternity leave and moving my role to solely pentesting. So I am looking for a new position effective immediately if anyone has any leads ๐
For added context, the actual drink protectors had no branding on them. This is a pic from one of many women who were using them at the CF party and were extremely thankful for them.
The lil package with the drink condom had like a cutesy funny sticker in each one letting women know to protect their drink but as one can see, it was pretty harmless and just a funny way of letting people know what the package was for.
UwU Underground clearly isn't selling against CF or even a tech vendor. They make funny and educational free music online as told by women in this industry. Handing out drink protectors is someone near and dear to all of us because many either have personally experienced having something slipped into our drink or someone we know. We also knew someone who was dosed at a bar just on Monday.
I organise @MalwareVillage parties, and can confirm that we will have free drink protection for all attendees (available at the door as soon as they walk in and at the bars)
@SamStrongTalks
I think you missed the point.. The ends justify the means here.
Drink protection kits should've already been handed out by the venue before people even entered. Most places don't do this, they just assume no one will get roofied and if it happens, it's the victims problem, not theirs.
That's why people like @uwu_underground step up and pass around kits to actually mitigate the risk. Kicking them out just because their logo is on it is absurd. This is straight up negligence on safety because a $77.6B+ company feels "at risk" over some cute drink protectors.
I see your point about corporate policy on advertising, but I like to think we can all agree on this... if the venue itself wasn't handing out any drink protectors, they should've let @uwu_underground continue doing it.
Safety shouldn't take a backseat to branding rules.. especially when the alternative is zero protection for attendees. .-. Kicking people out for trying to prevent drink spiking just looks like the company prioritizing its image over people's actual safety :3.
Dear @Cloudflare our field team got kicked out of your party for handing out drink protection kits
By a Director of Sales.
Explain, slowly, what part of "donโt get drugged" conflicts with your brand and beliefs?
Go ahead we'll wait