all games are effectively open source atp, opus can reverse engineer any game effectively by faking controller/keyboard inputs and observing state! Do this with enough instances/compute you can reverse engineer any game!
Meet Qwen-Image-2.1, the most balanced and cost-effective image generation model in the Qwen-Image series! Now open weights! 🎨
A unified model for both generation and editing, delivering top-tier quality in a lightweight package.
Highlights: 👀
- Compact & exceptionally fast: A lightweight 7B architecture that outperforms most closed-source models, with drastically accelerated inference for multi-image inputs.
- Native transparency: Natively generates and edits RGBA layers, enabling seamless compositing and text editing within transparent images.
- Versatile, high-fidelity editing: Supports up to 10 reference images and precise local control while preserving strict fidelity for portraits and products.
- Broad coverage & stunning aesthetics: Excels at panoramas, infographics, and virtual try-ons, delivering realistic textures and elegant typography.
Start to create your next masterpiece with Qwen-Image-2.1! 🖼️
- Blog: https://t.co/tVntKOi7jy
- GitHub: https://t.co/cRj66wCrWr
- Model Scope: https://t.co/64d7Ix6YFR
- Hugging Face: https://t.co/njHSBXUbVS
What are China’s biggest concerns about AI?
A new article by Chen Yixin, China’s Minister of State Security, in the latest issue of China Cybersecurity Magazine offers some revealing clues.
Chen identifies six major risks:
1. Regime security. Hostile forces and people with ulterior motives can use deepfakes, AI-generated text and images, and automated online accounts to cheaply and massively produce political rumors, spread harmful information, and incite social divisions—waging “public-opinion wars” and “cognitive warfare” against China and directly threatening its political, institutional, and ideological security.
2. Critical infrastructure. AI can enable countries and organizations to rapidly discover vulnerabilities, automatically chain together attack paths, and carry out sophisticated hacking operations, dramatically lowering the technical barriers and costs of cyberattacks against China’s critical information infrastructure.
3. Data leakage. Foreign intelligence agencies can use AI-powered web crawlers, data mining, and profiling to collect sensitive information, including critical national data, trade secrets, and citizens’ personal information. Chinese users who process sensitive information through foreign AI products or export data abroad could also cause large-scale data leaks.
4. Closed technological ecosystems. Countries with advantages in AI theory, model architecture, and computing power may invoke “national security” to impose technology controls, entity lists, monopolize technical standards, and build closed-source ecosystems, restricting other countries’ access to advanced technologies and fragmenting global AI supply chains.
5. Structural challenges to social governance. AI creates new uncertainties for social governance and public order. Algorithmic “black boxes” and data poisoning can amplify existing social biases; misuse of personal information can trigger crises of public trust; automated decision-making creates difficult questions of accountability; and the rapid development of AI is increasingly outpacing existing laws, ethics, and regulatory mechanisms.
6. A fundamental transformation of warfare. AI is pushing warfare into an era of “intelligentization.” Whoever can use algorithms to achieve more precise sensing, judgment, and targeting will gain the initiative on the battlefield. AI is moving from an auxiliary role to a central one in intelligence fusion, decision support, target identification, combat operations, and cognitive warfare.
And what is the solution?
Chen’s answer is revealing: strengthen “Party control over the internet” and “Party control over data,” and “transform the advantages of Party leadership into the effectiveness of AI governance.”
In other words, from the CCP’s perspective, the central question is not simply AI versus no AI. Nor is it even fundamentally a contest between the US and China.
It is a contest between the US and the CCP over who gets to control AI, data, information, and ultimately the future of society.
And whoever wins that contest will decide the future of humanity.
https://t.co/9lXlS93A7h
astonishing blogpost from Shengyu Liu (刘胜与, also known as interestingLSY/intlsy), kernel engineer at DeepSeek. The first part is his personal struggle with the fact that his work is about to render his beloved craft obsolete. The second is…
well. let's just say we agree.
@KiefinItReals@0xSero This has nothing to do with inflation, do you know a little bit about economics at least? It's a shortage due to supply allocation. Even though inflation may be through the roof, this has nothing to do with it
WATCH: Russian drone pilots taping $2 magnetic compasses to their plywood Molniya UAVs to navigate when GPS/GLONASS gets jammed.
The camera tilts down to read the needle mid-flight.
@gamez_jaco17951@CastillloX El catolicismo historicamente ha tenido roces con los judios, inclusive en ocasiones expulsándolos como en 1492. Te refieres a hosanna que iza la bandera de israel a toda honra
@chrisrivero2000@MadridRealUy Muy buen partido por cierto, pero estos descuidos son los que cuestan titulos.
Su descuido contra el bayern, independiente del partido bueno/regular que estaba teniendo, elimino al madrid. Esto pasa ya demasiado, amarillas, faltas tontas como contra el arsenal, etc