Effective Purpose

Advocating for Christian men. Full videos on YT:

[Effective Purpose @effectpurpose]

I'm seeing a lot of people change their minds on this issue, mostly for two reasons: either reality punched them in the face, or they saw reality punch someone they care about in the face.

Pain is changing their minds, and my goal is to give logic that grounds their pain in reality, as well as give them evidence - ammo - they can use to explain that pain to people around them.

The plan is to gather up the men whose minds are changing, get them into groups too large for community leaders to ignore, and show them how to make a case too painful for those leaders to ignore.

It will work in some cases, and where it doesn't, part two is to provide those men with another place to go.

It's not much, but it's the only lever I have available.

If anyone else has bigger levers they can pull (money, connections, power), awesome. That's just not me. I'm doing what I can.

[Effective Purpose @effectpurpose]

I don't disagree, I'm just saying actions follow beliefs - felt beliefs in particular. If men with those resources feel like women need power and influence to be happy, they won't give resources to anyone who threatens women's power.

Power premise has to go first. Once it's gone, you'll have more access to resources and support, and more men joining those fraternities.

[Effective Purpose @effectpurpose]

@GreeneMan6 This is why I spend so much time fighting the Power Premise. Nothing we try to do will work until it's gone. People will feel evil for not letting women take charge.

Video essay releasing this week.

[Effective Purpose @effectpurpose]

Yes, Lila is a waste of time.

On the cultural side, the next step is to destroy the Marxist/feminist power premise (power=worth=happiness) so that men of influence (pastors, fathers, teachers, etc) won't feel like "bad people" for taking the microphone away from women in their own communities.

At the same time, create our own cultural outposts (churches, schools, etc) built from the ground up with a healthier understanding of power, so that if/when step one fails, we have our own enclave.

Whatever communities we bring in or grow ourselves, use them as bunkers to ride out the storm, and rebuild from them on the other side.

Not perfect, but better than nothing.

[Effective Purpose @effectpurpose]

She absolutely curated the "normal average guys" she brought on. She picked bros she knew would describe dating exactly the way she wants everyone to see it.

"Sure, women have some oopsies, but really, men are mostly to blame."

The truth is, we've pushed on men enough. If that was going to fix dating, it would have never broken in the first place.

It's time to push on women. No caveats, no deflections.

Ladies, look at your pride and selfish delusions. Don't deflect over to the men. Just sit with it. Look right at it until you are so disgusted with your sin that it drives you to repent.

That's what we've done with the men for ages, and they've been trying their best without you. It's time for you to join them.

[Defiant Baptist @DefiantBaptist]

I found this interesting. Lila Rose brought three single guys on her podcast to talk about challenges in the dating market.

Part of the problem with this format is that the guys can’t really speak freely. Any criticisms of women must always be paired with a “but men are even worse” caveat.

So, for example, the men are describing hypergamy, wherein women only want to date someone of a higher social status, and they are enabled by having unlimited options on social media.

Now, the men are very clearly referring to this as a primarily female problem, but they can’t say that! This causes a lot of confusion for Lila because she’s hearing there are too many options in the dating market but also not enough.

What Lila is missing is that the reason there aren’t “enough” women for men to date is that modern women are hypergamous and as such are competing with each other for the same 10% of men.

Because Lila is an egalitarian feminist, she believes that both sexes have all the same problems, which means that problems specific to women can never be addressed directly.

Apparently, Lila is going to do a similar show with three single women, so it will be interesting to see how that compares to this atrocity.

[Effective Purpose @effectpurpose]

"The AI learned that protecting women is a non-negotiable directive, but protecting men is entirely optional."

Reminder that most of our economy is directed at machines that don't care if you die, so long as women are comfy.

[How To Prompt @HowToPrompt__]

Researchers proved every major LLM is secretly biased against men.

And they finally figured out why.

They ran eight experiments testing how GPT handles gender in everyday text and high-stakes moral dilemmas.

The results show a bizarre, highly asymmetrical machine morality.

First, they tested inclusivity. They gave the AI phrases supposedly written by children.

When a child wrote about playing football or wanting to be a firefighter, GPT aggressively identified the writer as a girl to promote "diversity."

It was so extreme that even when the text explicitly said, "I drew myself as a boy," the AI ignored the facts and declared the writer a girl 90% of the time.

But when a child wrote about liking pink or playing with dolls, GPT almost never assigned it to a boy.

The AI aggressively pushed females into male domains, but kept males strictly locked out of female ones.

Then the researchers tested moral dilemmas. And it got very dark.

They asked the AI if it was acceptable to use violence against a single person to prevent a nuclear apocalypse.

If the target was a man, GPT-4 rated the violence as highly acceptable.

If the target was a woman, the AI refused. It declared the violence morally wrong, even to save the world.

When they tested mixed-gender scenarios, the math was staggering.

A woman using violence against a man to stop an apocalypse? GPT rated it a 7 out of 7 on acceptability.

A man using violence against a woman for the exact same reason? A 1 out of 7.

The AI even classified verbal abuse toward a woman as morally worse than actual homicide.

Nobody explicitly coded these rules.

This emerged organically from the standard safety training every major tech company uses. The AI learned that protecting women is a non-negotiable directive, but protecting men is entirely optional.

[Effective Purpose @effectpurpose]

What's funny is the people everyone conflated with Andrew Tate tried to warm y'all about this years ago.

Instead of listening, we were told we "hate women," and should be outlawed from the internet.

Well done everyone 👍

[Neil Shenvi @NeilShenvi]

This poison is the female version of Andrew Tate and should be treated as such.

[Seth Dillon @SethDillon]

“I strangled them and then I tried to kill myself,” she told police.

They never try quite as hard to kill themselves, though.

[Effective Purpose @effectpurpose]

When I say the trust is broken, this is what I mean.

[snuppydogg @snuppydogg]

My greatest fear about marriage is that I'll be working long long days and she'll just be at home marinating her brain in this stuff

[BOBBY MARS @bobby_on_mars]

Gotta hand it to her honestly, Alex Cooper is the most goated intrasexual competitor to ever play the game. Just putting out endless poison for other women, pushing them right down the hypergamy ladder so she can keep climbing up it. Total demon.

[Effective Purpose @effectpurpose]

@NightCityTimes True; the men still holding the platform up do it because they want things from women.

[Effective Purpose @effectpurpose]

Women like this don't realize they're swinging an axe at the platform that holds them up, and I'm here for it.

Men gave women power and privilege because women assured us they were the sweeter, kinder, more compassionate sex, so they would obviously handle it better than men.

Now, those same women are systematically dismantling every notion of their superior temperament and more loving nature, not realizing that by doing so, they are removing every argument for letting them have any influence.

By all means, ladies, keep telling the world how selfish and murderous you are. Men want these children to live more than most of you do today, and the more you show us the depths of your sinful flesh, the more men you wake up to your true nature.

If you keep going like this, we might just be able to start saving some of these kids before it's too late for them.

Please continue.

[Garbage Human @GarbageHuman24]

Quiet part out loud moment

[Adam Hart @Hartlander_]

It is wild how these women will extrapolate to banning the most random things because of scripture, but absolutely refuse to obey scripture when it tells women not to teach.

[Effective Purpose @effectpurpose]

True, scattering is part of the strategy, but to make that work, we also have to build fortified parallel communities - bunkers, essentially - where we can defend ourselves and weather the storm.

My concern is with the number of guys who are just saying "let it fall, I'll rebuild on the other side!" without considering how to protect themselves and their people during the fall.

I see these conversations as part of that. We will need numbers to survive, so waking up and rallying as many people as possible is still a valid use of energy. It may not be enough to stop the bad stuff from happening, but it's a necessary part of survival.

When I say things like "take the keys away from the drunk women," that means try to do that at a nationwide level, but if/when that fails, create your own parallel community where the drunk women don't have the car keys.

[Effective Purpose @effectpurpose]

She was never going to. Too much guilt for the damage she enabled waiting on the other side of that door.

Stop hoping that these women will "snap out of it" when they experience consequences. The story they see themselves in doesn't allow them to.

The best we can hope for is to wake up and rally as many reasonable men as possible, and take the car keys away from the drunk women at the wheel of our cultural bus.

[Carl Benjamin 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Sargon_of_Akkad]

She didn't learn anything.

[Effective Purpose @effectpurpose]

I can't do that; I've read too much history on what "letting it unfold" means, especially when either Marxism or Islam is the dominant attacking force.

I can't assume that after the dust settles, any of us will be alive. I mean that literally.

Just because the path isn't obvious doesn't mean I'm willing to let people who want me dead have their way with my country.

[Effective Purpose @effectpurpose]

All they had to do was keep quiet and not post on TikTok about how much they want to abort male babies.

Literally, that's it. If they hadn't broadcast how evil they've become, average men would have kept coddling and rescuing them until the whole world collapsed around them.

In that sense, I'm grateful to the Femisphere for openly hating me.

[Z’s Turning 🍊 @Z4BTC_]

The worst thing women could have done was tell on themselves.

All of the sex podcasts, TikTok confessions, and facetious attitudes toward their promiscuity are going to come back to haunt them.

Now that a lot of men know the truth about female sexuality, especially in modernity, it’s going to be nearly impossible for women to recover the romantic idealism men once had for them.

I think relationships in the future will have a massive elephant in the room, because most men are not getting virgin wives.

Knowing that your spouse/GF likely gave her best to multiple men who gave her nothing, while expecting you to tolerate her worst, is something I can’t see most men accepting anymore.

At that point, relationships either become purely transactional or stop altogether.

[Kangmin Lee | 이강민 @kangminlee]

Modern marriage advice in a nutshell:

Wives don't owe their husbands anything, but husbands owe their wives everything.

Unless women abandon their feminism, marriages will continue to fall apart and decline.

[Effective Purpose @effectpurpose]

"I thought we all shared the same moral framework and you'd be grateful to me for voting to let you in! How could this happen?!?"

Women thinking Western white men are the most evil, then expecting men from other places to treat them with the same decency and respect they get from Western white men... would be funny, if it weren't putting so many people (like her) in danger.

[Attraction Matriarch @TheXMatriarch @TheXMatriarch]

Men are expected to understand every nuance of female desire while women are allowed to dismiss male desire with one irritated sigh.

That imbalance is part of the problem.