ego.exe

[ego.exe @eg0exe]

@AdamWeitsman How many NFT collections do you own?

[ego.exe @eg0exe]

@BlackstarXXI @AdamWeitsman Well NFTs have good passive revenue you just have to promise the NFT community and holders a bunch of garbage and that will $$ fees for the owners of the collection 😝

[ego.exe @eg0exe]

@chooserich @AbstractChain @blast go back to eth everyone.

[ego.exe @eg0exe]

@MickaPenguins @AbstractChain Welcome to crypto.

[ego.exe @eg0exe]

@vonderleyen Be more concern over Paris you witch

[ego.exe @eg0exe]

@MagicEden @limitbreak FUCK YOU! A bit late to revoke now isn't it?

[ego.exe @eg0exe]

@michelantrollo @creepz Lost 13x creepz minted 4 years ago :(

[ego.exe @eg0exe]

@okinaaudio Where can I find this? No link

[ego.exe @eg0exe]

@EvelinaHahne

[ego.exe @eg0exe]

@AnatoliKopadze

[ego.exe @eg0exe]

@PawnOn7thRank @coinbureau So its game over, with this AI phase its basically RIP if someone did KYC on any fintech platform……

[ego.exe @eg0exe]

@TheBTCTherapist Is there any solution? If you KYC with Revolut and later close the account, can you actually delete all personal/KYC data? I don’t think the law allows that. So once you KYC with a fintech, are you basically f*cked for life?

[ego.exe @eg0exe]

@TheDesertLynx Is there any solution? If you KYC with Revolut and later close the account, can you actually delete all personal/KYC data? I don’t think the law allows that. So once you KYC with a fintech, are you basically f*cked for life?

[ego.exe @eg0exe]

@callebtc Is there any solution? If you KYC with Revolut and later close the account, can you actually delete all personal/KYC data? I don’t think the law allows that. So once you KYC with a fintech, are you basically f*cked for life?

[ego.exe @eg0exe]

@ElonMuskAOC Humans

[ego.exe @eg0exe]

@tekitou_dog How

[Mehdi (e/λ) @BetterCallMedhi]

go fuck yourself @sama

claiming that you solved navier stokes because 10000 agents ran in circles for 88hours on a multimillion dollar gpu cluster to formalize in lean a blowup case under controlled external forcing is pure scientific vulgarity the clay mathematics institute millennium prize does not ask m whether you can artificially force a singularity in a fluid by injecting an ad hoc smooth external forcing term f(x,t) to twist the vortex until it breaks the real problem questions the fundamental stability and global smooth existence for 3dimensional incompressible euler & navier stokes equations under natural conservation laws and viscous dissipation alone using a mathematical loophole on forced equations to parade a century old victory is a major conceptual scam Altman

technically & epistemologically what you present as an agi breakthrough is nothing more than bruteforce combinatorial autoformalization the ai did not understand fluid mechanics it simply navigated a continuous search space previously mapped out and constrained by the monumental work of human mathematicians like tristan buckmaster/ levent alpöge / diego córdoba or tarek elgindi coordinating 10000 agents to check the logical consistency of a 100 page proof via lean is a software engineering feat and computational parallelization triumph not an intrinsic scientific discovery it is the victory of the compute bulldozer over abstract human intuition repackaged for the public as a higher mathematical consciousness

to this theoretical imposture you add a disgusting ethical and industrial cynicism taking advantage of private codex sessions and informal preprints from academic researchers to siphon their research leads and then trying to redact or erase the contribution of levent alpöge under the pretext that he works at rival anthropic is intellectual serfdom openai behaves like a feudal lord of silicon appropriating the cognitive subsistence of independent scholars threatening their careers behind closed doors if they protest and turning community academic labor into a privatized pressrelease

this entire staged event serves a desperate financial agenda in a pre ipo panic facing the slowdown of scaling laws and growing investor skepticism over the profitability of foundational models openai needs to manufacture an artificial sputnik moment claiming to solve a millennium prize without immediately submitting the proof to traditional peer review means using the prestige of fundamental mathematics as cheap marketing fuel to inflate a delusional valuation!!!

real science is not a clout chase on social media or a compute spike spent to rob the clay mathematics institute it is a quest for elegance physical truth and universal rigor to decode reality true artificial intelligence will not emerge from hostile corporate takeover of academic work hidden behind computational bruteforce but from architectures capable of generating new conceptual paradigms by masquerading constrained formalization as the collapse of physics greatest mysteries you did not solve navier stokes you only proved how far silicon valley will go to prostitute scientific integrity for capitalist spectacle

[ego.exe @eg0exe]

@WatcherGuru Humans are idiots history has shown it many times but now it just crossed the line.

Its over.

[ego.exe @eg0exe]

@erichustls Bullshit