Bruno

As opiniões aqui expressas refletem a minha verdade sem nenhuma pretensão de agradar alguém.

[Bruno @ehusguridesb]

Quem sou eu?

[Bruno @ehusguridesb]

@Capozza_Franc Con stima. La Veterum Sapientia (1962) cita, sullo stesso allarme, Leone XIII 1899, Pio XI 1922 e 1924, Pio XII 1951. Tre pontificati prima del Concilio. E Sacrosanctum Concilium 36 il latino lo conserva.

Perché quei Papi dovettero ripeterlo per sessant'anni?

[Bruno @ehusguridesb]

@smuszynski92 judging a text by the mind behind it is the "principle of immanence", the modernist subjectivism you claim to fight. Yet St. Pius X's Catechism calls a Pope-confirmed Council "infallible as the word of God." So, obey your own saint, or the private spirit? 3/

[Bruno @ehusguridesb]

@smuszynski92 Meinvielle built that principle to DEFEND a council against its drafters
Tissier inverts the very tool. Judging a text by its authors' private minds, not the Church's authority, is the "free examination" St. Pius X's Catechism condemns as the Protestant error. 2/

[Bruno @ehusguridesb]

@robbertleusink Pius XII (Mediator Dei) rejected liturgical antiquarianism and affirmed papal authority over liturgy

Calling a valid Mass a "protestant supper" while preaching on Trent is the real selective magisterium. You abandoned Ambrose bc you lost the history

[Bruno @ehusguridesb]

@robbertleusink St. Pius V used the EXACT same in perpetuum clause in Quod a Nobis for the Breviary
By your logic, St. Pius X violated "perpetual force" in 1911 (Divino Afflatu) when he radically reformed it
Trent (Sess 21, Ch 2) explicitly defines the Church’s authority to reform rites

[Bruno @ehusguridesb]

@robbertleusink Also, St. Ambrose filled a VACANT see after Auxentius died, was consecrated by bishops in communion w/ Rome, and confirmed by Pope Damasus I.

He wasn't consecrated by a non-canonical society defying a explicit Papal command. Intention doesn't override Church structure!

[Bruno @ehusguridesb]

@robbertleusink Classic goalpost shift
May laity demand orthodox bishops in times of crisis? Yes (Can. 212 §3)
Does that give anyone the right to consecrate bishops without a Papal mandate in direct defiance of Rome? No. Demanding orthodoxy is a petition; creating a parallel hierarchy is schism

[Bruno @ehusguridesb]

@chadpostolico Tradición sin Pedro es una contradicción

[Bruno @ehusguridesb]

@chadpostolico La FSSPX ataca la Misa Novus Ordo y el Vaticano II. Ningún Papa puede dar mandato a obispos para que formen fieles en el rechazo al Magisterio vivo
Excusar la insubordinación en "agencias/agendas internas" es pura mentalidad de libre examen protestante.

[Bruno @ehusguridesb]

@robbertleusink 3️⃣ Magisterium: Pius XII (Ad Apostolorum Principis) condemned using ancient customs to justify modern defiance.

Headcount doesn't grant jurisdiction. A private group isn't the Early Church. Consecrating bsp w/o papal mandate = schism & automatic excommunication (Can. 1387)

[Bruno @ehusguridesb]

@robbertleusink 2️⃣ Heresy of "Vox Populi": Council of Trent (Sess. 23) & Pius VI (Auctorem Fidei) explicitly condemned the idea that authority comes from the people or that "vox populi" overrides the Holy See. That’s Protestant/Galican ecclesiology, not Catholic.

[Bruno @ehusguridesb]

A explicação é bem simples: o ponto é que Jesus falou em aramaico, não em grego. Em aramaico, Ele disse: "Tu és Kepha, e sobre esta Kepha edificarei minha Igreja". A mesma palavra (Kepha) é usada tanto para o nome de Pedro quanto para a rocha.

[Nikkeys 🇧🇷✝️ @DaquetedouOutrA]

@protexreestyle Cristo não mentiu, quem mentiu na interpretação foram vocês.

[Bruno @ehusguridesb]

Você se lembra de quando ingressou no X? Eu me lembro! #MeuAniversárioNoX

[Quem é Satoshi @Quem_e_Satoshi]

Manda: