Please call him a jihadist. The word socialist has no meaning.
The GOP needs to start naming the Islamic threat by its name or @MikeRogersForMI will lose this race.
Not even Rogers is calling Abdul out for what he is. A jihadist Muslim.
Why is the GOP so afraid to say this?
I was just supposed to record a podcast episode with a Fox News host who invited me on their podcast to discuss my reporting in Ukraine. I was supposed to record at 4 pm EST, but then they canceled on me 20 minutes before our interview because Fox News management said they can’t have me on.
Censorship is alive and well at Fox News @FoxNews under the blacklist on me imposed by Suzanne Scott, the President of Fox News. I’ve been on this blacklist since 2017.
When @PeteHegseth and @JudgeJeanine worked for Fox News and tried to have me on, Suzanne Scott (a liberal) told them they couldn’t have me on and would be reprimanded if they interacted with me on X.
I’m told she allegedly directed the entire network to not cover my trip to Ukriane.
What a miserable bitch!
I’ve been on the Fox News Blacklist for 10 years, yet they allow for communists and jihadist candidates to go on air to badmouth President Trump daily.
What made America was all done very intentionally. People/communities seeking agency and wielding cultural soft and at times government hard power to do so.
America was likewise undone by her domestic enemies very intentionally just the same.
America will need to be redone every bit as intentionally. None of this will occur in the abstract. The theoretical does not spontaneously combust. There will not be some cultural Big Bang to save us.
It will require the same seeking and wielding of cultural and government power to restore individual God-given rights. And if you don’t believe me, look how far our colonial ancestors were willing to go. We act as if they just declared their independence and it was so. No, what came next were years of what we would nowadays consider savagery inside our contemporary comfort zones.
We are no longer within an intact social compact. Our domestic enemies want to end our very way of life, and are making that plain in word and deed. Thus Thatcher’s “first you win the argument then you win the vote” axiom so often quoted on the Right no longer applies. Perhaps some of us haven’t yet noticed, but we are post-argument with our domestic enemies. The only arguments still occurring are among us, Besides, Thatcher’s England is totally lost to the Spirit of the Age now, which only bolsters my point.
The creed for this era need to be “first you win the war and then you get to have arguments.” Our Founders earned the right to have internal debates of philosophical depth among themselves because they won the war. We aren’t even close to doing the same.
Blaming dispensationalists or integralists is the new neocons or isolationists. Some people within these camps I’m sure intend sincerity of discourse, but if you’re on your 50th post of the week about either our enemies will laugh and just continue urinating on the relics of our past when they’re not just tearing them down altogether.
The average Joe doesn’t care about any of this, while too many on platforms like this are so shallow they’ve relegated such terms to mere trope status. Average Joes are just trying to survive, and that’s what we should be trying to collectively do.
I propose instead the following ongoing argument — what is your plan for achieving and wielding cultural and government power to reclaim our heritage and secure our birthright? And what are you doing to follow through on such?
And there’s just one rule — we can’t do anything the God who grants us our rights says is wrong. That’s it. That’s the only rule. Anyone wearing our uniform proposes or flirts with such, that is when we have internal disciplinary discourse about what to do with them.
Otherwise, the discourse should be how we’re gonna do everything we can to defeat our domestic enemies other than what God says we can’t.
BREAKING UPDATE: @AuburnU just EDITED their site after we exposed them for violating Trump’s EO and pushing DEI
Don’t worry, we have the receipts!
Just because they removed their DEI pledge from the site, it doesn’t mean they aren’t still injecting DEI.
Needs to be investigated! @AAGDhillon
INBOX: A truck belonging to the PA Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (@DCNRnews) was spotted with "8647" written on the back.
This symbol is used to call for the ass*ssination of President Trump.
Any comment, @DCNRnews?
Just because you received a Voter Identification Card, does not mean you are a U.S. Citizen.
That's on Alaska's own election website. Exactly what the SAVE America Act fixes.
Senator @LisaMurkowski, let's get you to yes. My new op-ed in @Breitbart lays out how.
🚨 MIKE LINDELL RESPONDS TO VIRAL "AMNESTY" CLAIMS: "THIS IS FAKE NEWS - OF COURSE I WANT AMERICA FIRST."
A clipped video circulating on social media is being used to FALSLEY claim @realMikeLindell supports "six months of amnesty." Lindell says that's FALSE and that his comments have been taken OUT OF CONTEXT.
Lindell explained his proposal was to fingerprint, document, and vet illegal immigrants already in the country so authorities know who they are, making it easier to prevent illegal voting and quickly remove those who commit crimes.
"No pathway to citizenship ever. And you can't vote."
He said criminal illegal aliens should be deported immediately, while emphasizing that everyone should come to the United States legally.
He stressed that immigration is a federal issue, noting that any such plan would have to be implemented by the federal government, not the State of Minnesota.
Lindell said he was simply offering a federal PROPOSAL to address an existing problem and gauge public reaction - NOT advocating amnesty.
Lindell says the viral clips leave out those key details and insists his position remains unchanged:
"Of course I want America First. Minnesota First and our families first. Everything. You need to come into the United States legally."
As always, I stand with President Trump and fully support his policies to deport illegal aliens from the United States.
Immigration law is a complex issue. Some of my comments have been taken out of context about guest worker visas, in which people take seasonal jobs for a few months.
I absolutely do not support amnesty, that is FAKE NEWS.
President Trump has asked all Americans to call Sen. John Thune's office and ask - RESPECTFULLY - that he gets the SAVE America Act passed. The "respectfully" part was a little hard for me, but I did it.
Now it’s your turn: (202) 224-2321
Republicans: Do you agree non-citizens shouldn't be able to vote?
Democrats: Sure.
Republicans: Great! Help us pass the SAVE America Act that requires ID and proof of citizenship to vote.
Democrats: It's already the law.
Republicans: There's no law requiring proof. It's on the honor system.
Democrats: Non-citizens don't vote.
Republicans: Actually there's hundreds of thousands of non-citizens on the voter rolls. We have evidence many do vote.
Democrats: No we don't support a law requiring proof.
Republicans: Why?
Democrats: Because it will make it harder for Democrats to win.
Republicans: If non-citizens aren't voting, how?
Democrats: Black people and married women.
Republicans: That doesn't make sense.
Democrats: Racist, mysoginist.
Senate GOP: This feels hard. Let's go on vacaton.
I stopped using the bathroom at my own school because the adults on my school board not only wouldn’t defend me, they hired lawyers to discredit me.
I’m speaking up so the next girl doesn’t have to face death threats just for saying that boys don’t belong in girls bathrooms.
Alaska registers people to vote first, then asks non-citizens to fix it later. Their own election website says so.
The SAVE America Act fixes exactly that, and yet @LisaMurkowski says she's a "no."
Call and urge her to change from a "no" to a "YES."
202-224-3121
That’s just not true.
No person would be turned away from voting.
Any person without documentation would be able to sign an attestation.
The SAVE America Act does NOT require proof of citizenship for those already registered to vote.
Why don’t you suggest an amendment which would allow remote Alaskan voters to attach a copy of their proof of citizenship + photo ID to an absentee ballot?
It’s completely disingenuous to say you don’t have the time to implement the SAVE America Act
when you could have passed it last year.
It’s equally as bad to say that you support photo ID & proof of citizenship when you won’t even offer suggestions for how to earn your support on this legislation.
Looks like I’ll have to travel to Alaska to ask the voters themselves.