Ekāntabrāhmaṇa

Reader and student of Brahmanya. Inclined towards Mimamsa and Bhedabheda. Supposed to be Samavedi of Kauthuma Sakha.

[Ekāntabrāhmaṇa @ekantabrahmana]

@Assualt361846 Hindu deities have been used as political messaging since the time of printing. This one too. Nothing much to say, just enjoying on twitter.

[Herr Schmitt @Balwantrao0104]

I read an article on substack which critiqued left liberal retelling of our epics (Chitra Banerjee, et al.). All seemed good (article was AI slop but fine) until the writer suggested Amish Tripathi's books instead.

[তীক্ষ্ণদংষ্ট্রঃ || तीक्ष्णदंष्ट्रः @shardula23]

Chhaya Sita concept is present in Matsya and Kurma Puranas.

[Ekāntabrāhmaṇa @ekantabrahmana]

I wouldn't watch it, but I don't boycott. I haven't watched any movies made by Hondas, as almost all of them are perversion, untruths and State propaganda.

[Mohit @Warlock_mohit]

Share your honest reaction to the Ramayana film,

Would you support it or boycott it?

[Ekāntabrāhmaṇa @ekantabrahmana]

@ShortHuman2 She was a weak warrior then. Just for show and play.

[Ekāntabrāhmaṇa @ekantabrahmana]

@INDRAJI66791503 Why didn't she fight the women Rakshasis and ran away from Ashok Vatika?

[Ekāntabrāhmaṇa @ekantabrahmana]

What exactly is Honda scripture?

Hondas don't have scriptures, they have vogue beliefs and trends.

[Aaditya Sreenath आदित्य श्रीनाथ ಆದಿತ್ಯ ಶ್ರೀನಾಥ್ @bhakti_sagara]

The comments on the below post itself shows that most Hindus have no regard for their own scriptures and will distort it to suit their woke, virtue-signalling mindset.

No sympathy for such people. Let them rot in the pits of Naraka for blasphemy

[Ekāntabrāhmaṇa @ekantabrahmana]

True. Truth is the biggest enemy of Hondas.

When Abla naree was famous, they showed that on TV, when girlboss-ism is famous, they'll show that.

Hondaism is whatever is in vogue, not what is truth. Also not a new thing.

[OM 🏹 @omfilmzz]

Agar valmiki ji ke according ramayana dikha di to, apne hi log movie ko boycott kar denge.

[Ekāntabrāhmaṇa @ekantabrahmana]

@_suhanis Why it is not a meaningful criticism?

The girlboss-ism, feminist retelling of Sita is evident in trailer. And possibly inspiration from Amish Tripathi (not Adbhuta Ramayana).

Some people may love this, some who know what it truly is, not. The criticism has meaning for them.

[Ekāntabrāhmaṇa @ekantabrahmana]

@jagjssl @shrimansavage That was a momentry lapse in judgement because of childhood. Rama and Sita did a lot of Leela in childhood because they keep forgetting that they are manava avatara.

[Ekāntabrāhmaṇa @ekantabrahmana]

@shrimansavage @ashokdraws And is complicit in bloodbath and death of so many Rakshasas and Vanara youth. So to say

[Ekāntabrāhmaṇa @ekantabrahmana]

@EmeraldRayquaz1 @Rishabh_3126 None of these are historical. They have happened in some other plain of reality.

Anyways, in Adbhuta also, a form of Devi sprang from Sita. I guess. Ask a Sakta.

[Ekāntabrāhmaṇa @ekantabrahmana]

@Raniiisaa_ Of course I don't believe in this.

Sita was a composed queen and always felt sorry for even the Rakshasas youth that died because of evil of Ravana.

[Ekāntabrāhmaṇa @ekantabrahmana]

@Raniiisaa_ Then she was evil. She could have ended the conflict before it escalated into a massacre, yet she did not. She allowed Ravana to abduct her, remained in the Ashoka Vatika, and watched as countless Rakshasas and Vanaras died in the ensuing war.

[Ranisa @Raniiisaa_]

Amish Tripathi is an absolutely pathetic writer His stories are pure nonsense, like the bizarre hallucinations you get when your blood pressure drops

[Ekāntabrāhmaṇa @ekantabrahmana]

Why did Rama take an avatāra in the first place, then? Was she happy to watch Vanaras and Rākṣasas die while she herself refrains from intervening?

If she possessed the power to end the bloodshed but chose not to, what exactly are we supposed to admire or worship in her?

[Ranisa @Raniiisaa_]

Sita Ji was capable enough to kill Ravana herself but then shree Rama’s avatar would have gone to waste. That’s why she didn’t do it.

[Ekāntabrāhmaṇa @ekantabrahmana]

@tobey852069 5% from Vaishnava narrative, 5% from Buddhist, 5% from Shakta, 5% from Bhakta, 5% from jain, 5% from feminist lens, 5% from dalit shoshit vanchit lens, 5% from historical lens, 5% from rationalist, 5% from phule and Periyar, 5% from girl boss... Altogether a true Honda narrative.

[Ekāntabrāhmaṇa @ekantabrahmana]

@goldrush_11 @bee2wts Well, the record if the previous record Hindus and Hindutvist goes, I would say they will show a feminist empowered warrior Sita. Just like they did with one prithviraja movie.

Lol.

[Ekāntabrāhmaṇa @ekantabrahmana]

So as per the movie, Sita was week to not able to fight against Ravana and yet could fight off other smaller Rakshasas? Why couldn't she fight the women Rakshasas and run away?

You can't pick a part of Sita from Valmiki and part from other Shakta narrative.

That's inconsistent.

[ॐ : bee @bee2wts]

@Gargi16191 @Sai_Pallavi92 @WorldOfRamayana she's not damsel in distress but she doesn't have to fight anyone physically to prove that bhai.

[Ekāntabrāhmaṇa @ekantabrahmana]

@Brown_Boy_69 @Rishabh_3126 Hondas modern rishis are Amish Tripathi, Agnihotri, Nilesh Malhotra etc. yes. 😄

Goswami was casteist and misogynist after all.

[Ekāntabrāhmaṇa @ekantabrahmana]

@Rishabh_3126 @DarkAnalyst007 @prabhasfan55 Yes, it is shown in Tulsidas Ramacharitamanas also, brings tears in eyes of Bhaktas.