@SDSLLC_USA I don't trust groups, organizations or credentials. I trust individuals. Once I trust an individual, I may then evaluate for their credentials and I may view their friends in a better light. Maybe.
@MadamSavvy No marketing can generate trust in a company that let the heart and soul of GTA leave.
Will the game be good? Maybe, but I doubt it.
Rockstar is nothing more than the people running it and the people who made GTA great a no longer there.
@BasedMikeLee none.
Both, to an extent are requisite and both require caution and transparency.
IMO "leaders" are creating a mountain out of mole hill with the lack of apparent caution and transparency.
One would be wise to ask themselves why that is.
@ConceptualJames The question is not "was Romney a bad candidate?"
The question is: which of the two likely winners was less bad.
Based on the fallout from the Obama era, I would conclude that Romney would have been less bad.
We are never offered "good" candidates. Are you new?
@Grummz I will wait until the honeymoon period is over and re-assess.
I learned my lesson with Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) and then I was an idiot and pre-ordered Starfield.
Never again is now.
@AutismCapital my impression is that it will sell well on the reputation of the previous installments, but history will not be kind to this iteration.
A la The Force Awakens, Starfield, etc
@MadamSavvy I would be hard, regardless.
Making bad decision is bad. I do not feel the need to enumerate what may have happened in the presence of different bad decisions. I'm only comparing it to what GTA used to be.
If it doesn't measure up, it doesn't measure up. Simple as
@AutismCapital my impression is that it will sell well on the reputation of the previous installments, but history will not be kind to this iteration.
A la The Force Awakens, Starfield, etc
@CynicalPublius "never-ending mysteries"
so its Lost in a bunker
"For every mystery solved, three more emerge."
So its like a quasi less bad version of Lost.
Got it.