Elango

[Big Brother Watch @BigBrotherWatch]

🚨BREAKING: Keir Starmer announces social media ban for under-16s

“Politicians and tech companies have let children down for too long. But in a headlong rush to make up for lost time, the government is going down the wrong path.”

“The British people have always, rightly, rejected mandatory ID schemes. Now the government is imposing digital ID checkpoints for the internet. This is not like Challenge 25 for alcohol. We will all face a “papers, please” demand to get online.”

“Big Brother Watch would welcome evidence-led policies that offer real protection for young people. Instead, the government is mimicking much of Australia’s failed policy. A policy their own eSafety Commissioner admits has failed to keep children off social media.”

“Worse, these proposals will force the public to trust their IDs to companies with serious track records of leaks and hacks.”

“Targeted interventions that hold platforms to account, enforce existing laws, and give parents the tools they need are the answer. Evidence from Australia shows age bans don’t keep children off social media, they just remove the safety measures platforms put in place for them”

- Jack Coulson, Head of Advocacy

[The Free Speech Union @SpeechUnion]

Why is Sir Keir Starmer’s Government set to ban under-16s from accessing 10 major social media platforms — including X — but not left-wing platforms like Bluesky?

Since coming to power, this Government has been openly hostile to X, a forum for debate that prides itself on free speech. Ministers have even floated the idea of blocking UK citizens’ access to the platform altogether.

Starmer can no longer pretend this is solely about protecting children.

[Fiona Rose Diamond @CoviLeaks]

🚨 The government made their own devices 100% invisible, so they can force yours to be 100% transparent. Did you know this? 🚨

They dodge the laws they force on you.
On us. The people!

Do not take this lightly.
Every MP is exempt.
Every Lord is exempt.
Every elite civil servant is exempt.
EVERY PARASITE IS EXEMPT!

They force the laws on us.
They legally shield themselves.
Total public surveillance.
Total state secrecy.
Absolute parasite immunity.

The well-funded, ‘professional’ campaigns wrap this up in polite, Ofcom-palatable jargon… we need to stop playing nice and call this brutal hypocrisy exactly what it is: a legal coup against our privacy.

If you complain about the length of this post or a 8-minute video, you are part of the problem. No filters and no apologies. Wake up or get out of the way.

🚨 RULES FOR THEE, PRIVACY FOR ME: What you NEED to know!

The UK has engineered a digital dictatorship. They demand total transparency from you, while securing absolute secrecy for themselves. This is not a theory. It is written directly into hard law.

Here is the brutal, stripped-down truth of how the political parasites legally insulated themselves from the surveillance panopticon they are forcing onto the public.

1. The Divine Right of MPs
The Law: Section 26, Investigatory Powers Act 2016
The Privilege: Intelligence agencies cannot touch an MP’s data without a personal, written veto from the Prime Minister.
The Tyranny: Your life is subjected to automated bulk surveillance. Theirs is legally untouchable.

2. The Private Internet Loophole
The Law: Schedule 1, Online Safety Act 2023
The Privilege: Official networks used by Ministers, Lords, and civil servants are explicitly exempt from client-side phone scanning.
The Tyranny: Your personal WhatsApp must be stripped of privacy and screened. Their government-shielded apps are completely walled off.

3. The Unchecked Dictator Veto
The Law: The "Henry VIII" Clauses in the Online Safety Act
The Privilege: Ministers hold secondary legislative powers to alter and expand exemptions via Statutory Instruments.
The Tyranny: If parasite official ever faces a surveillance clause, they can simply rewrite the law behind closed doors without a democratic vote.

4. The Weaponised Wilson Doctrine
The Law: Codified Parliamentary Surveillance Protections
The Privilege: The police and security services are completely banned from tracking, tapping, or snooping on politicians.
The Tyranny: The very individuals voting to turn your smartphone into an informant are constitutionally protected from ever experiencing the consequences of their own votes.

💥 THE VERDICT
This is the textbook definition of tyranny. A free society requires a transparent state and private citizens. The UK has completely inverted it. Your private thoughts, messages, and photos are treated as state property, while the parasites have declared their own devices sacred, unmonitored, and completely opaque.

They know exactly how dangerous this technology is - which is precisely why they wrote themselves out of it.

📱 Step 1: The Secret Tunnel (The State VPN)
When an MP, Minister, or elite civil servant works from home, they do not use standard family Wi-Fi. Their government laptops and phones are hard-coded to connect to a secure Government VPN (Virtual Private Network).

🔒 Step 2: The Legal Loophole Activates
The second that VPN clicks on, every single text, photo, and WhatsApp message they send is sucked out of their house and routed through private servers owned by Parliament. Because their data is now flowing through a "public body network," it triggers Schedule 1 of the Online Safety Act.

🕵️‍♂️ Step 3: Complete Invisibility
By law, this private state network is 100% exempt from the screening and scanning algorithms forced onto the public. Their devices instantly become legally invisible and untouchable to the state dragnet.

💥 The Naked Truth
Your Home: Your personal Wi-Fi pushes your private messages into a public commercial pipeline where the government demands it be scanned and screened.

Their Home: Their Wi-Fi instantly flips into a secure, state-shielded fortress.

Location does not matter. The ruling class built a private internet for themselves, using a legal and technical bypass to completely dodge the digital panopticon they are forcing onto you.

FYI: From 2020, when Civil Servants and MP’s worked from home, the Parliamentary Digital Service (PDS) mass-distributed pre-configured laptops, secure mobile devices, and hardware to the home addresses of every MP, Peer, and civil servant. They did not need to install private physical servers in individual houses because the devices themselves act as portable endpoints for the state's centralised servers… then, Government IT teams rapidly re-engineered their servers to handle the strain, massive scaling their corporate VPN capability. This allowed every single person in the state machine to plug their official laptop into their home Wi-Fi, click a button, and completely tunnel their traffic back into secure, centralized government servers.

So, what shall we do folks!?

New MNC (link in bio) campaign to begin VERY soon! But ideas welcome.

[Politics UK @PolitlcsUK]

🚨 NEW: Keir Starmer will introduce nightly social media curfews for 16 and 17-year-olds as part of the Government's social media ban

[@thetimes]

[Big Brother Watch @BigBrotherWatch]

🆔Starmer's plans for child-locked devices is a Trojan horse for digital ID

"The only way to escape Starmer’s Great British Firewall and get regular internet access is to undergo a digital ID check on the device to register yourself as an adult user.

Convenient, perhaps, for a Prime Minister who has failed to get a digital ID system through the front door" - @silkiecarlo

[(was) Seeking Justice (now) Raising Awareness @ImanZayna]

UPDATE: June 2026 coverage by @Telegraph by @camillahmturner

I believe this is:
*Part 1:
https://t.co/RId4oybRW9
*Part 2: will be in the Sunday Telegraph paper
*Part 3: a longer video piece online next week.

***************

I will be releasing the FULL audio meeting I had with @AndyBurnhamGM and IOPC @policeconduct Regional Director Catherine Bates. The public needs to see the level of the cover up and corruption involved in protecting predatory @gmpolice officers and how I have been treated. This meeting exposes who is telling the truth...ME and who is lying...THEM!

I was drugged and sexually assaulted in police custody in Feb 2021. I requested the footage and 4.5 hours worth of footage was concealed including the 'missing' EVIDENTIAL FOOTAGE.

Currently the request for digital forensics which would prove what actually happened to the evidential footage has been withheld for 23 months by @gmpolice @AndyBurnhamGM @policeconduct @ICOnews

Why should I protect the establishment bodies when they have failed to protect me and the wider Greater Manchester public?

🩷THANK YOU to everyone who has followed my journey, believed me, supported me and helped me raise awareness despite the smear attempts🩷

I have data that is not currently in the public domain simply because its not the right time nor are the current police complaints bodies the right people. So, watch this space as there is more to come...😉

[All The Right Movies @ATRightMovies]

PREDATOR was released 39 years ago today. Among the most popular science fiction/action movies of the 1980s, and one of Arnold Schwarzenegger’s biggest movies, the behind the scenes tale ain’t got time to bleed…

1/55

[Sharron Davies HoL MBE @sharrond62]

MPs who go on social media should not turn off replies. They are public employees.

[Big Brother Watch @BigBrotherWatch]

🆔The Labour Government is threatening ID checks for the internet

Our director @silkiecarlo speaks to the BBC what plans for child-locked devices really mean for our internet privacy and freedom⤵️

[The Cultural Tutor @culturaltutor]

Who's to blame for boring architecture?

[Silkie Carlo @silkiecarlo]

... We would be very concerned about the creation of a fast lane for censorship that can be activated at times that are politically convenient for the government.

It's right that illegal content is taken offline but that responsibility has to be paired with strong protections /1

[spiked @spikedonline]

The rape gangs did not emerge in a vacuum. Many migrants from Mirpur in Pakistan have brought their patriarchal, misogynistic attitudes and clannish culture to the UK. We must not shy away from discussing this, says Rakib Ehsan
https://t.co/lMKpuRYMSo

[Policy Exchange @Policy_Exchange]

Following the stabbing in Belfast, Jonathan Hall KC, Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation and State Threats Legislation, states that migration should be a national security issue.

Hall's words deserve careful consideration by the Home Secretary. Policy Exchange flagged the issue of migration and national security back in 2023 - after Lord Godson asked how many Minister of Religion and Religious Worker visas were being issued to Iranian clerics to enter the UK. A review was promised: what progress has there been?

https://t.co/Gce6FzJFLi

[Ian Acheson 🇬🇧☘️ @NotThatBigIan]

Some thoughts on the barbarity that unfolded last night in Belfast. Free to read. Happy to engage with anyone who thinks different. Balloons who don't get beyond the headline I didn't write will be ignored and blocked

https://t.co/4gSqtuQ8ZX

[Mullvad.net @mullvadnet]

This is what the UK spyware proposal means.

There must be government spyware on every mobile device. It shall watch everything that happens, including always watching the screen, looking for things the government disapproves of.

When anything is flagged by the software as something the government doesn't like, the software must block it from being sent or displayed (in realtime).

The user of the device must not be able to shut this watching and blocking off. The only way to shut it off would be to ask the government or its proxies to do so for you, at their discretion.

Therefore the whole device must be locked down. Administrator rights and the decision of what software or operating system to run or not to run must be taken from the owner/user and handed to the government and its proxies.

Apple and Google are themselves working hard to lock down the devices they are involved in to shut out competition and establish a duopoly.

The UK government says it is "working closely" with Apple and Google and currently they synchronise and coordinate their communication on this subject.

The UK government is now proposing to mandate what would otherwise be illegal anti-competitive practices.

@GrapheneOS on the Apple and Google duopoly:
https://t.co/rbRmcUDTRu

Statement from @signalapp
https://t.co/vJILcSrs4s

@ReclaimTheNetHQ on the state spyware:
https://t.co/3FCi06bP77

The government announcement:
https://t.co/ynYjR3DIRo

[Signal @signalapp]

Our statement on the UK government’s demand that all content on all devices sold or used in the country be scanned, on the presumption of nudity, using a dystopian combination of age verification and content scanning. This proposal will not safeguard children. It endangers us all.

https://t.co/VdWe9uhi8p

[Bernie @Artemisfornow]

🚨WARNING the bit Starmer isnt telling you is... this sort of device technology is called Client-Side Scanning.

It is already built into the Ofcom regulated Online Safety Act through “accredited technology” notices. The EU has been pushing similar rules through its Child Sexual Abuse Regulation, known as “Chat Control”.

It basically means phone companies and platforms can be pushed to scan messages, images and content BEFORE you send them, then either allowing them to be sent or blocking/reporting them.

Once the precedent is set, "to protect children", it can easily be widened to block whatever government decides is “harmful”.

And that's how you go from child safety to state approved speech.

TA DAAAA 🚨

[Big Brother Watch @BigBrotherWatch]

🚨 BREAKING: Keir Starmer threatens mandatory ID checks to use mobile phones

"Protecting children online is vital, but these are outrageous plans that will fail to address the underlying causes of online harm. This will only result in population-wide ID checks for all of us to use our phones, tablets and laptops.

"Put simply, the Labour Government is threatening ID checks for the internet. No one in a democracy should need to show their passport just to get online.

"These plans would replace efforts for meaningful tech and parental responsibility with performative, authoritarian government control that children can easily circumvent by accessing adult-registered devices. However, for the UK's 50 million adults using the internet, this backdoor digital ID requirement would invoke the death of anonymity and internet privacy.

"The Government's plan very likely means that unless you submit to intrusive identity checks when setting up your phone or computer, there will be a chokehold on your software and internet access leaving you with a child-locked device. Planned restrictions on messaging, streaming and browsing raise the potential of spyware in our pockets that will be exploited for other purposes before long.

"The Government mandating that all phones in Britain require ID and surveillance software is a crossing of the Rubicon that would make the UK one of the most authoritarian internet regimes in the world. This extreme technological censorship requires rigorous public and parliamentary scrutiny that is currently totally missing" - Silkie Carlo | @silkiecarlo

[Big Brother Watch @BigBrotherWatch]

📵NEWS: The UK Government is planning to force tech companies to restrict phones

“This will only result in population-wide ID checks for all of us to use our phones, tablets and laptops.

These plans would replace efforts for meaningful tech and parental responsibility with performative, authoritarian government control that children can easily circumvent by accessing adult-registered devices." - @silkiecarlo

Read⤵️
https://t.co/f7Y9x6aXRT

[Dr Rakib Ehsan @rakibehsan]

Henry Nowak's murder and the police's handling of his stabbing is a watershed moment for UK race relations.

Radical-progressive identity politics in our public institutions, remains a major threat to social cohesion in modern Britain.

My latest @GBNEWS.

https://t.co/g1fGWRLT2H