Hey mates!
I am transitioning from this account to my new X account @RajaVibing to align with my ongoing focus and interest in the space. Moving forward I will interact and tweet from my new account while I slowly phase out this account.
Thank you!
@0xfoobar It goes deeper than that. It all depends on the type of deal and the conditions agreed between the project and the investors. If an investor take an active oversight of the management, mismanagement of funds by the founders could be avoided, but it hardly happens in our industry.
@icobeast this is a fair proposition and establishes the credibility. But good luck finding an investor. In an ideal scenario, everything is easier. In reality, this is F hard.
You've a point and I do not entirely disagree. No one ever gives a F, everyone focuses on growing their own bags, including the founders.
The reality is founders can't escape TGE. And there's no quick way to build token momentum. Those who only looks at the short-term W, will loose, while others working towards long-term W, will W. @Cbb0fe
@Ghosterx4x@Aptos $APT most of their monthly revenue stayed =<$100K, where their monthly expenses =<$20M. @Ghosterx4x
P.S. I am not a supporter/ hater of SUI.
Stay far away from these ICOs:
1. Raised $10โ50 M from VCs but launching at $1โ5 B FDV
2. Pre-mainnet, pre-revenue. No product, only narrative and hype
3. 5โ8 % public float (rest is VC/team dumping later)
4. Claims โFair launchโ but likely heavy private rounds at 10โ50x discount
5. Prediction markets already pricing $1B+ (manipulated)
6. Every KOL suddenly shilling it non-stop
7. If you get access, early investors lock ends < 6 months
Did I miss anything? What do you normally look for?
@Defi_Scribbler@humidifi@AviciMoney@Plasma Whatโs backfiring when a project does a infofi campaign? Why thereโs a consistent failures amongst projects? Did $MON do infofi campaign?
@TheWhiteWhaleV2 The flow of liquidity is a function of how market players react. During bear we see liquidity crunch and the opposite during the bull.
But a well written piece.
@paramonoww Itโs a Web2.5. Established its PMF. Agree it bridges short term demand. Majority world economy is still fiat driven. Even if wider merchants accept direct stables, someone needs to off ramp to buy tomatoes from a street vendor.
But very well written!
@Defi_Scribbler@rainbowdotme@sportfun@octra@infinex@zama@fogo@gensynai I understand for assurance we seek stronger validation from thought leaders but in your ICO journey to make bags, your probable misstep is to follow a KOL.
Youโre better off, doing your own research and common sense.
Well written mate! It was never easier if you look in that context. If you look from todayโs perspective, in relative terms things appear easier.
I agree with you that always there are opportunities. I find truly successful people are the ones who always stayed curious and jumped on the trends earlier on.
@0xPepesso As seen in another tweet recently, many FINTECH businesses like WISE are already using blockchain infra but would not come out publicly to acknowledge, because they still earn higher fees .
Mate, @smartcoded For a Pre revenue, Pre mainnet project, this is insane valuation. Also, You had already raised $20mn . May we know at what valuation?
If youโre valued at $1bn, why would your investors go for such a small pie of just 2% by investing $20mn. As an investor when I see your $1bn potential, Iโd go for a larger stake. Even by industry standard this doesnโt add up at all.
It screams inflated valuation to abstract max liquidity from the retail.
Your ideal valuation should be in the zone $100mn - $300mn.
P.S. I am not affiliated to either $MON or Tempo. I equally believe they have an unfair valuation too.
My intention is, Just calling out unfair industry practices.