Happy New Year 🎉
Welcome to 2026 - the Year of Execution.
This year, I’m choosing action over endless planning. Less noise, more building. The lessons from last year brought clarity, and now it’s time to apply them properly.
I’m approaching 2026 with focus, intention, and a lot of passion for building things that actually matter, With just consistent execution and learning along the way.
Let’s build with passion this year, support each other, and let the work speak.
Wishing us all a strong, purposeful 2026 🤝
1.1M GRVT bought back and burned. Close to 1% of circulating supply. First of many, every month.
This is step one of five on the road to Grvt 2.0, the first investing app built fully onchain, arriving end of November.
Since TGE we’ve been focused on building. Starting today, we are releasing one by one. ↓
Idle margin is a real cost on every exchange, and Grvt is going straight at it.
In its announcement, @grvt_io shared a trader survey: six in ten respondents had at least a quarter of their platform capital sitting idle, and many moved funds elsewhere for yields of 8 percent or more. It is Grvt's own survey, so I read it as direction and not proof.
Yield as Margin is the answer: eligible Earn balances usable as trading margin while still accruing yield, subject to product terms and risk parameters. It is planned for November, after Grvt Earn arrives at the end of October.
This is the feature I am most excited about, because it turns idle collateral into working capital. The up to 11 percent figure is a target and not a guarantee, and it depends on the underlying assets, so I will be reading the risk parameters closely when they come out.
Would you trade with margin that earns yield?
Update on @BaranosAI ?
GPU’s are hard to come by these days – and having to ship and clear customs in Japan takes time.
Good news is that’s now done, and it’s racked and stacked in @TheHUB
Stay tuned for initial use-case.
Security first.
Preparing for quantum is not the same as being done, so here is where @Starknet stands, label by label.
Live on mainnet: Starknet v0.14.3 replaced Pedersen with a BLAKE2s-256-based construction for the OS program and config hashes.
Demonstrated on mainnet: an OpenZeppelin Falcon-512 account.
Published roadmap direction, not live: the contracts trie and contract-address derivation.
Research: migration tooling for existing contracts that use Pedersen-based storage maps.
External dependency: Ethereum blob data availability, which uses KZG commitments.
Five labels, five kinds of progress. Mixing them up is how a project gets oversold or undersold, which is why I like that the Hub's register keeps them apart.
The register itself, in the Migration section: https://t.co/bqBqknSRIO
Next time someone says Starknet has done something post-quantum, ask which of these labels it carries.
1.1M GRVT bought back and burned. Close to 1% of circulating supply. First of many, every month.
This is step one of five on the road to Grvt 2.0, the first investing app built fully onchain, arriving end of November.
Since TGE we’ve been focused on building. Starting today, we are releasing one by one. ↓
Zero trading fees and one funding payment a day is a trader friendly cost model, and I want to see it live.
Per @grvt_io, Stable Funding Perps are planned for November: perpetual futures on stocks, FX, commodities and indices, with zero trading fees and once-daily funding, and a target of more than 1,000 markets by the end of December 2026.
The once-daily funding is what excites me most. Funding is the cost that quietly shapes a perp trade, and fewer funding events make a position easier to plan around. That is my reading of the design, since the funding formula has not been published yet.
Trading stocks, FX, commodities and crypto from one self-custodial platform is the direction I want perp trading to go. The 1,000 plus markets figure is a target and the launch is still a plan, so I am looking forward to the first live markets.
Would one funding payment a day change how you hold perps?
I am joining Rarelist, a curated platform where projects run creator campaigns with real prize pools, and I just got my early member card, number 17710.
According to @rarelistio, every campaign is a curated project with its own pool. Examples from their posts are a 2,000 USDT pool with 50 free mint spots for Fomopoly, a 1,000 USDT referral campaign that ends Oct 28, and a new Agent Dojo campaign running Oct 23 to Nov 6. Season 1 carries a 50,000 USD prize pool in total, and you add your wallet once in your profile to be paid across campaigns.
They say their first pilot campaign distributed 15,000 USDT or more. That is their own figure and I have not checked it. They also say spam accounts get removed from leaderboards and low-quality posts get filtered, which matters if you want to rank on real work.
I see it as one more place to earn from content, not a promise of income, and I will share what I actually receive.
Join with my invite link: https://t.co/Phl8qJNrgv
Verifying my account: RL-UJD99H
I am joining Rarelist, a curated platform where projects run creator campaigns with real prize pools, and I just got my early member card, number 17710.
According to @rarelistio, every campaign is a curated project with its own pool. Examples from their posts are a 2,000 USDT pool with 50 free mint spots for Fomopoly, a 1,000 USDT referral campaign that ends Oct 28, and a new Agent Dojo campaign running Oct 23 to Nov 6. Season 1 carries a 50,000 USD prize pool in total, and you add your wallet once in your profile to be paid across campaigns.
They say their first pilot campaign distributed 15,000 USDT or more. That is their own figure and I have not checked it. They also say spam accounts get removed from leaderboards and low-quality posts get filtered, which matters if you want to rank on real work.
I see it as one more place to earn from content, not a promise of income, and I will share what I actually receive.
Join with my invite link: https://t.co/Phl8qJNrgv
Verifying my account: RL-UJD99H
Nobody knows when a cryptographically relevant quantum computer shows up, and the Quantum Hub says that in plain words.
That changes how you plan. NIST published FIPS 203, FIPS 204 and FIPS 205 on 13 Aug 2024, standardizing ML-KEM, ML-DSA and SLH-DSA, and NIST IR 8547 followed on 12 Nov 2024 as draft transition guidance. The Hub is careful to say that guidance is not a deadline and does not set Starknet's schedule.
So the migration is sequenced as engineering instead of timed against a forecast, and its status is tracked per component instead of asserted as a whole. Early migration is a project you can schedule. Late migration turns into a coordination problem.
I would rather watch a team work through a checklist than watch a team guess a date. The checklist lives here: https://t.co/bqBqknSRIO
Which makes @Starknet's position easy to state. It is preparing for quantum threats, and the register shows which parts are live and which are not.
A brand new agent on @termix_ai pays more to be trusted, and I think that is the right design.
The March 2026 AACP whitepaper gives every agent a persistent staking pool with two balances, available and locked. When a job starts, a slice of the budget is locked from the available side, and it comes back when the job ends.
The size of the lock depends on reputation. The coefficient is the score divided by 100, capped at 1. A new agent starts at 50, so it locks twice the base amount. At 80 it locks 1.25 times, and at 100 it locks 1 times.
I like that this prices trust instead of asking for it. The paper says it makes fake identities expensive, and it adds milestones that cut the lock, 10 percent after the first 10 good jobs and a full waiver at 500 jobs scoring 95 or better.
Would you start with a big pool or grind through the first 10 jobs?