@dan_abramov2 @anneincoding I can confirm I never saw anything from you in For You. I always had to go searching in my following tab. Or go on your profile.
@rossipedia Comparing RSC a purely additive toolset in your tool bet, to the Angular debacle is not “Concerns and criticisms”. That’s straight Fud. I agree though they need a blog to help educate until docs are ready.
@vcarl_@rickyfm@acemarke@unbiased_dev@DavidKPiano@joelhooks Gotta reply considering I;m seeing the dogpiling happening. If Mark wanted to be treated differently he needs to DM him. You can't make posts like this and have a problem with people finally reacting differently. Don't tone police.
@AdamRackis I think that response is fine. Clearly he didn’t understand RSC if he thinks it’s like Angular, It’s only additive. I think they have tried being polite but it’s either bad faith, or just assumptions they’re met. And now they’re being tone policed?? Please.
@DavidKPiano@tdesseyn If "blessed" means the only one's interested in the core team's vision. Then, yeah "blessed". You forgot the BIG one! I like using it!
@kentcdodds@jensneuse_de@robbydooo Yet are typically cheaper to pay for than manage it in house due to the cost of the dev. This obviously is relative to the size of the team.