Evelyn Dean

love my speedway and football, and our 4 legged friends.

[Cat Brown 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🚜🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇮🇪 @MrsBr0wn_82]

🚨🇬🇧 The UK government has responded to the petition regarding folic acid in flour.

The UK Government is forcing synthetic folic acid into all non-wholemeal wheat flour from the end of 2026.

This affects 70 million people to supposedly prevent just 200 neural tube defect cases a year.

It’s not just bread it means almost every everyday product made with white or brown flour: pasta, pizza bases, cakes, biscuits, pastries, pies, crackers, and most processed baked goods. Men and children get zero benefit, yet studies have linked higher folic acid intake to increased prostate cancer risk in men.

They’re choosing mass medication of the entire population through our staple foods instead of targeted supplements for women who actually need it.

This is being forced on us without real choice. It will appear in the ingredients list, but there’ll be no clear warning on the front of the pack.

Natural folate from food is one thing this unnatural synthetic chemical is another.

Sign the petition in the comments we need to at least have a debate on this.

Please share with as many people as possible.

[Pete Sanford @PeteSanford]

THE MILIBAND BROTHERS: CRIME SYNDICATE

THE TIMELINE THAT NOW DEMANDS ANSWERS**

And why today’s asbestos revelation makes Miliband’s silence untenable...

For more than a year, the government has insisted that the UK–China “clean energy partnership” is nothing unusual — just routine cooperation, nothing to see here.

But the timeline tells a very different story, and today’s news about asbestos found IN Chinese‑manufactured wind turbines turns this from a policy debate into a public‑safety and national‑security issue.

Here is the sequence of events that now requires full transparency.

🔹 March 2025 — Ed Miliband signs a Memorandum of Understanding with China

He travels to Beijing and signs a wide‑ranging MoU covering:

- Offshore wind
- Electricity grids
- Battery storage
- Carbon capture
- Hydrogen

These are not minor areas. These are **critical national‑infrastructure sectors**.

🔹 March 2025 – February 2026 — The MoU is kept out of public view**

For almost a year, the agreement is not published, not debated in Parliament, and not disclosed to the public.

No press release.
No ministerial statement.
No scrutiny.

🔹 27 February 2026 — The MoU is quietly released.

No announcement. No explanation.
It simply appears on a government website.

The timing and the silence raise immediate questions.

🔹 Spring 2026 — Miliband repeatedly refuses to release the full details.

Across multiple interviews, he:

- Dodges direct questions
- Repeats scripted lines about “normal cooperation”
- Avoids explaining what China gains
- Avoids explaining what UK infrastructure China may influence
- Refuses to publish the full text or annexes

This is not transparency
This is avoidance

🔹 June 2026 — RUSI warns of deepening UK dependence on Chinese supply chains
A respected defence think tank warns that the UK’s offshore‑wind expansion risks:

- Strategic dependence
- Supply‑chain vulnerability
- Loss of control over critical components

Miliband does not address these warnings directly.

🔹 TODAY —

Asbestos found in Chinese‑manufactured wind turbines
This is the moment everything changes.

Asbestos is banned in the UK.
It is a known carcinogen
Its presence in imported turbine components is a **major regulatory failure**.

This is no longer a theoretical risk.

This is a **real‑world safety breach** involving the very sector Miliband has tied to deeper cooperation with China.

THE QUESTIONS ED MILIBAND MUST NOW ANSWER:

1. Why did you refuse to release the full China MoU for so long?

A year‑long delay followed by a quiet publication is not normal practice for a major international agreement.

2. Does the MoU expand Chinese involvement in UK offshore wind projects?

The public deserves clarity on whether Chinese firms gain access to UK tenders, supply chains, or grid‑related work.

3. Were you aware of asbestos risks in imported turbine components?

If yes, why was the public not informed?
If no, why were safety checks inadequate?

4. What due‑diligence processes exist for foreign‑manufactured renewable‑energy components?

Today’s revelation suggests they are either weak or non‑existent.

5. Will you now publish the full MoU, including annexes, technical notes, and implementation plans?

Partial transparency is not transparency.

6. How will the government ensure that UK infrastructure is not compromised by unsafe or non‑compliant imports?

This is a matter of public health and national security.

7. Why should the public trust your assurances when the supply chain has already failed at the most basic safety level?

The asbestos discovery undermines every claim of “routine cooperation” and “nothing to worry about.”

**WHY THIS MATTERS**

This is not about geopolitics.
This is not about party politics.
This is about:

- Public safety
- Regulatory integrity
- National infrastructure
- Transparency in government

When a minister signs an agreement with a foreign power covering critical infrastructure, the public has the right to know **exactly** what was agreed — especially when components from that same country are now found to contain banned carcinogenic materials.

The refusal to release the MoU is no longer a procedural issue.

It is now a **public‑interest emergency**

Given The Potential Corruption of Two Brothers from the Marxist End of Labour.

Ed handing out Huge Green Energy Contracts.

Brother David sitting on the Board of a company seeking to make money from the same Contracts.

IT IS TIME PARLIAMENT, AND THE POLICE TOOK AN INTEREST IN THE CHINESE DEAL

[Niall Harbison @NiallHarbison]

If you like the dogs I share and they cheer you up daily, I’d love you to watch this one video.

I only do this once a year and never ask any other time.

You can support here and if you can’t sharing this video helps 🙏 https://t.co/Roftrb3ZWW

[Artur Nadolny @ArturNadol7566]

22 YEARS LATER AND NOBODY HAS ANSWERED FOR WHAT HAPPENED TO DR DAVID KELLY

His name was Dr David Kelly. Most people have forgotten him. They shouldn't.

He was a quiet, mild-mannered scientist who spent his career inspecting weapons facilities around the world.

He knew more about Iraq's arsenal than almost anyone alive.

In 2003, Tony Blair's @InstituteGC government published a dossier claiming Saddam Hussein could deploy chemical weapons within 45 minutes. That claim was used to justify a war.

Kelly knew the intelligence behind it was being exaggerated. He said so, privately, to a @BBCNews journalist.

That one conversation destroyed his life.

The government found out he was the source. Instead of protecting a man who had served his country for decades, they quietly let his name reach the press. He was publicly identified, dragged before two parliamentary committees, and grilled by his own employer.

His wife said he came home a broken man.

On the afternoon of 17 July 2003, he left his house for a walk in the Oxfordshire countryside. He was 59 years old. He never came back.

His body was found the next morning in woodland. A knife beside him. A blister pack of painkillers nearby.

Here is where it gets worse.

Tony Blair personally intervened to replace the normal coroner's inquest with a private inquiry run by Lord Hutton.

The original inquest was suspended before it even properly began. It was never resumed. To this day,

Dr David Kelly is the only person in England and Wales in living memory to have died in unexplained circumstances without receiving a full coroner's inquest.

Lord Hutton concluded suicide. Case closed.

Except eight senior doctors and a former coroner wrote to @thetimes saying the verdict was medically unsafe.

The wound found on Kelly's wrist, a severed ulnar artery, would not cause fatal blood loss in a healthy person.

There were no fingerprints on the knife. The painkillers found were not in a quantity that experts considered lethal.

The government's response, delivered by Attorney General Dominic Grieve in 2011, was essentially: the Hutton Inquiry was good enough, stop asking questions.

Think about that. A man quietly raised concerns about the biggest political deception in modern British history, a war that led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people. He was publicly exposed, professionally destroyed, and found dead days later and the government personally made sure there would never be a proper independent investigation into how he died.

Tony Blair went on to become a Middle East Peace Envoy. He has a knighthood.

Dr David Kelly got a private inquiry, a rushed verdict, and a sealed post-mortem report that was not released to the public for years.

Nobody was ever held accountable. Not for any of it.

This story should be on the front page every single year. Share it if you think it matters.

Sources: @BBCNews @guardian @thetimes @PrivateEyeNews

[Darren of Plymouth @DarrenPlymouth]

LAWFUL REBELLION

YOUR RIGHT UNDER MAGNA CARTA

Under article 61 of Magna Carta 1215 (the founding document of our Constitution) we have a right to enter into lawful rebellion if we feel we are being governed unjustly. Contrary to common belief our Sovereign and her government are only there to govern us and not to rule us and this must be done within the constraint of our Common Law and the freedoms asserted to us by such Law, nothing can become law in this country if it falls outside of this simple constraint. Article 61 shows quite clearly who really holds the power in this country, that being quite simply us the people; we have Sovereignty not any Parliament and nor can this be taken from us by any Parliament who claim to have taken the people's Sovereignty.

This is how we solve our political woes and take our country back.

Only we can save ourselves.

Please repost.

[Robbie @Robbie_Reasons]

The Somerset Farmhouse of 1 North Street, Williton were approached by a "food influencer" that wanted to charge them £2,000 for a review.

They put out a video of Sally eating a sausage roll instead 😆.

Lets make Sally and the Somerset Farmhouse famous for free.

[Evelyn Dean @elgdean]

@JamesMelville I see lots of your posts

[Evelyn Dean @elgdean]

@JamesMelville Not from this year but my climbing rose, usually blooms in June

[Maxi @AllForProgress_]

You might have heard of Maggie Oliver.

She's a former Greater Manchester detective who, in 2012, was ordered to abandon her investigation into the systematic rape of children in Rochdale, and decided she would rather resign her warrant card rather than do so.

Maggie, as that would imply, is one of the good ones. I constantly ask how our police can consider themselves worthy of the badge if they are not willing to return the badge rather than commit injustice in its name. Maggie did just that; she was asked to cover for criminals, so she told the shirts to stuff themselves and handed back her commission.

She won a small but consequential victory in the High Court on Friday. Mr Justice Kimblin granted her foundation a full judicial review of whether the British state has actually done anything about the recommendations it accepted, in 2022, at the end of a seven-year inquiry into the institutional cover-up of decades of child sexual abuse.

Maggie Oliver is one woman. She has no political party behind her and no standing in Whitehall. She has no peerage, no chambers, no billionaire foundation footing her bills.

She was ordered, by senior officers, to drop her investigation into a network of men who were raping children in industrial quantities in her city, because of the demographics to which those men belong made the whole thing a bit awkward.

Fourteen years on, she has done what nobody else in this country has been able to. She has hauled the British state into open court to answer for the choice it made, over four years and under two governments, to hold a seven-year, £200 million inquiry into the institutional cover-up of child abuse and implement, deliberately, none of that inquiry's recommendations.

The Home Office accepted those recommendations in 2022. So did the Department for Education, the police inspectorates and the Crown Prosecution Service. And then nothing happened. The recommendations sat. The departments restructured. Ministers rotated.

The girls and women who had given evidence aged. More such operations continued around the country, while the men who had run the previous set of them either walked free, left the country, or drew their own pensions.

The state, in the manner of every institution Tony Blair ever built, had decided that the writing of the report was the action, and the doing of the report could be handed off to history.

That is what Maggie Oliver has now forced into court. And the political class knows what that means. The Home Secretary has not commented. The Prime Minister has not commented. The candidates jockeying through the post-Starmer Labour succession have, at the time of writing, failed even to speak her name, as though they know that, if they do, lightning will flash in the sky and they'll be turned into a pillar of Tesco's-own-brand dishwasher salt.

They are silent because they recognise, accurately, that the answers a judicial review will produce - to the question of why their inquiry's findings were treated as ornamental - will, should, must end the careers of every official who was supposed to act on them and did not. That councillors and councils, mayors, indeed entire political parties, will be caught under ultraviolet light and shown for their guilt.

It's time a government did what the British state has spent twenty years declining to do. Take on institutional failure.

Name the institutions that failed, in public, on the record. Name the officers and officials who covered it up, and the officers and officials who pressed for the cover-up too. Prosecute them under the standards that any other employee of a public organisation defrauding the public would expect to face.

The recommendations the inquiry produced must be implemented in full, alongside whatever further measures a second look at the evidence then demands.

There will not be another inquiry into the inquiries. There will be the verdicts.

Maggie Oliver is one of the bravest people in Britain. She has earned, by her own resignation and by fourteen years and a foundation and a court case carried on her back, the right to expect from a future British government the simple thing that ought to have happened in 2014, in 2016, in 2018, in 2022 and in every other year of this national disgrace.

She has not yet been given it; we have not yet been given it. But it will be given, and soon.

[No to Digital ID @NoToDigitalID]

Across the world, Australia, Europe and the UK people have decried censorship yet, it’s still coming.

Let’s make this a global tweet.

We will NOT comply.

Just tap 🔁.

Let’s see how far this can go.

[MAGA Voice @MAGAVoice]

Keir Starmer does NOT want the World to see how badly British Patriots want their country back

Would be a shame if it went viral on 𝕏

[Evelyn Dean @elgdean]

@BigBearF1 Hubby was stationed there back in the day and son now!

[ClarksonsFarm @ClarksonsFarm1]

Repost!🤝

[Evelyn Dean @elgdean]

@BBCSportScot RIP Scott, condolences to family and friends 🥲

[Benonwine @benonwine]

My heart is full being involved in this marvellous bringing together of British Patriots and Culture. 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🙏✌️✊

No screaming.
No fires raging through the streets.
No shattered glass.
No threats, no machetes, no chants of “Allahu Akbar.”

Just ordinary, decent, well-mannered Brits standing together with quiet dignity fighting to save the country they love from descending into barbarism.

This is what real love for Britain looks like. ❤️🇬🇧

The tide is turning.
Who’s standing with them? Drop a ❤️ and repost if Britain still means something to you.

[Evelyn Dean @elgdean]

@scottiebateman I love living in Wiltshire

[Evelyn Dean @elgdean]

@BigBearF1 @RedDevilsOnline Morning Bear

[Evelyn Dean @elgdean]

@BigBearF1 Morning Bear