@VegasAdjacent@johnholowach@Noah__Goldberg No, we can't all agree to disagree. It's factual -- she did not concede in the speech. That's what happens in a concession speech. (This is what Nithya said: "WIN OR LOSE, I AM SO PROUD TO BE AN ANGELENO."). It's not a gray area as you are trying to portray (for some reason)
@AndrewCFollett@yashar@cspan Is there an election rule about the legal significance of crying?
Thought experiment: if you think you lost the vote, and say well, looks like a loss, but then the votes are all counted and you WON, did you win?
These are the burning questions of our times
@politicalmath@davidmanheim@LeahLibresco You donโt get a breakout of people who voted in person on election day. What you got was composite results showing all of the in person cast ballots. So you would not see the same effect of more progressive, later mail-in voters
Trump should show up here at the L.A. County ballot processing center because heโd learn within five minutes this is democracy in action, not some conspiracy.
Los Angeles City Late Mail
๐ต Karen Bass โ 11,748 (36.9%)
๐ต Nithya Raman โ 10,664 (33.5%)
๐ด Spencer Pratt โ 6,433 (20.2%)
Ramanโs rough benchmark against Pratt is 11.2%, so this is an 2-point overperformance, though turnout could change that.
@Jtg1490@KalshiPolitics or it's that most conservatives voted early, as they tend to do, when there was basically 1 choice for them, and most progressives voted late, as they tend to do, when there were multiple choices and people waiting to see who emerged. or fine, do conspiracy
@JerusalemDemsas Doesn't the type of cheating matter somewhat here -- you treat it all as one big category "cheating". The evidence of what he did do is limited. Seems very lacking in your discussion.