🚨Contrary to recent reports, I’m told there is no truth to claims linking Arsenal with a potential January move for Barcelona attacker Dani Olmo. ❌ #AFC
@Ryanair I am looking to book flights for Next September 2027 from Newcastle to Lanzarote and also East Midlands to Lanzarote. Is the flight Schedule now out for September 2027 ? eg is it safe to book?
Doku agreed it's a title deciding match
If Arsenal win,,, they will be Champions
If Manchester City wins,,, they will beat Arsenal yet again
Guess what happened,,, Arsenal lost and went ahead to win the Premier League 😂
Speak of Aura Gamble 😭
🔴⚪ Stop putting Arsenal in the same bracket as Manchester City.
Chelsea? Fine. There’s a legitimate conversation to be had there. But Arsenal? Absolutely not.
Arsenal’s rise was built on the back of history, success, revenue, academy development, smart recruitment and years of reinvestment. Nobody handed us a blank cheque and told us to go shopping. In fact, Arsenal were among the clubs who felt the consequences when Chelsea transformed the financial landscape with massive spending and then City arrived and took it to another level.
So I find this narrative that “City had to bend the rules to catch up with clubs like Arsenal” ridiculous.
Catch up with what, exactly?
If financial regulations are supposedly nothing more than a mechanism created by established clubs to protect themselves, then explain why clubs outside the traditional elite have repeatedly suffered from reckless spending and financial mismanagement. QPR were hit with a huge FFP settlement after their promotion push, while Portsmouth’s insolvency became one of the reasons financial safeguards were strengthened.
Financial rules aren't there simply to stop ambitious clubs from growing. They're also about making sure an owner can't arrive with unlimited money, spend recklessly, get bored five years later and leave the club carrying the corpse of their experiment.
Build. Grow. Generate revenue. Reinvest. Repeat.
That's the boring route. That's the difficult route. But it's football.
And let's be clear about where things currently stand: reports on September 25, 2026 said an independent tribunal had found Manchester City liable for 114 of the 115 alleged breaches, although the process remains subject to appeal and the sanctions have not yet been determined. City have continued to deny wrongdoing.
That's why the attitude matters.
I can respect a City fan who says:
“If we're guilty, it's not a good look. But nobody can take away my memories.”
Fair enough. That's supporting your club.
But when the response becomes “everyone else cheats,” “the red cartel is against us,” or “cheating was worth it because look where we are now”, you've completely missed the point.
Because that's exactly why financial rules matter.
If breaking the rules gives you a competitive advantage and the eventual punishment is nothing more than a slap on the wrist, what exactly is stopping the next billionaire owner from doing the same thing?
Nothing.
So if wrongdoing is ultimately established and sanctions are imposed, they need to be serious enough to protect the integrity of the competition and deter the next club from taking the same gamble. The Premier League itself says its financial system is designed around sustainability and competitive balance.
Make the punishment harsh enough to hurt. Fair enough to be credible. Strong enough to be remembered.
Because if cheating pays, why would anyone bother playing by the rules? 😤
@easyJet
Is there any update regarding possible flight cancellations due to Portuguese strike action?
We have a trip planned out of Liverpool 3/10-6/10 into Lisbon. I can see you’ve pulled Southend already.
🚨Bruno Guimaraes’ goal against Sunderland has been nominated for the Premier League September Goal of the Month.
First Arsenal goal. First nomination. 🚀