pablo

[pablo @eltonecas]

@antonello No sé hasta qué punto el test evalúa bien lo que pretende. Pensé que serían textos con premisas similares, y no textos donde la propia selección puede inclinar la balanza de un lado (en el 1º elegí la IA porque habla de la condición humana, y no de la guerra, tema que no me gusta

[pablo @eltonecas]

@javilop @psluaces No sé si es una cosa que me atraiga. La IA ayudará a generar juegos que ahora mismo necesitan 100s o 1000s de personas, y eso democratizará la creación, pero si se generan juegos basados solo en mí, generará todos los juegos "iguales" (un poco como el feed de tiktok)

[pablo @eltonecas]

@adhocstudio I've just requested the refund. I'll be more than happy to purchase the game again once the setting to control the content is added and we get the same experience as other platforms

[pablo @eltonecas]

@adhocstudio The fact that you censor your game without any clear notice is incredible and disrespectful with your audience. I bought the game yesterday for switch 2 instead of ps5 to have the same experience while travelling. I hope this changes soon

[pablo @eltonecas]

@GLSspainIT Al menos contratad un chatbot o unas respuestas automáticas en el idioma de tus usuarios…

[pablo @eltonecas]

@lagamez @GLS_Spain Es la peor empresa de paquetería con diferencia. Deben tener por norma de empresa dejar los paquetes en puntos de recogida porque todos los paquetes que me envían con ellos me hacen la misma (y teletrabajo)

[pablo @eltonecas]

@Tyrexito Puede que las cifras de Alemania estén “alteradas” por su cobertura de trenes de media distancia? Aquí en España lo apostamos todo a la alta velocidad, por lo q la media nos sale súper alta

[pablo @eltonecas]

@josecontic @kurioso @Mishi_2210 Sip, me di cuenta después de contestar

[pablo @eltonecas]

@kurioso @Mishi_2210 5031? (no dice que tiene que ser de 3 cifras)

[Kiko Llaneras @kikollan]

✨ El mundo no empeora, mejora.

No es perfecto; ni siquiera un buen lugar. Pero de los escenarios globales que hemos conocido (no imaginado o deseado), este es el mejor.

45 datos para empezar 2026 con optimismo👇

[Min Choi @minchoi]

This story is wild

Chinese state-backed hackers hijacked Claude Code to run one of the first AI-orchestrated cyber-espionage

Using autonomous agents to infiltrate ~30 global companies, banks, manufacturers and government networks🤯

How the attack was carried out in 5 phases

[pablo @eltonecas]

@pamplinero Según ChatGPT (y parece q al menos los datos de 2024 se corresponden con los del vídeo, este sería el aumento porcentual)

[pablo @eltonecas]

@pamplinero Lo desconozco, solo puntualizo que ella no se refiere al total

[Carles Tamayo @TamayoStuff]

…

[/RootedCON @rootedcon]

Tal y como anunciamos previamente, y tras haber agotado todas las vías legales a nuestro alcance para hacerle entender al juez que su decisión, en favor de La Liga y Telefónica, de bloquear páginas web y restringir el acceso a usuarios legítimos representa una grave anomalía en un Estado democrático, nos vemos obligados a dar el siguiente paso: la presentación de un recurso de amparo ante el Tribunal Constitucional.

Dicha resolución judicial ignora de manera sorpresiva los argumentos planteados en nuestros recursos, en los que hacíamos referencia directa a los derechos fundamentales a la tutela judicial efectiva y las libertades de expresión e información, amparados por la Constitución. La negativa del juez a valorar estos derechos elementales deja en evidencia una preocupante deriva autoritaria en el uso de medidas judiciales para censurar y criminalizar el acceso a internet bajo pretextos difusos y generalistas.

Desde RootedCON, tras 15 años impulsando la libertad, la innovación y el pensamiento crítico en el ámbito de la ciberseguridad, no podemos quedarnos de brazos cruzados ante este atropello. Las medidas adoptadas, sin transparencia, sin proporcionalidad y sin garantías adecuadas, representan un precedente extremadamente peligroso para los derechos digitales de la ciudadanía y el ecosistema tecnológico español.

Instamos a La Liga, a los operadores implicados y al poder judicial a reflexionar sobre el grave impacto de este tipo de decisiones, que se asemejan más a prácticas propias de regímenes autoritarios del siglo pasado que a las de una democracia moderna y con futuro.

Por todo ello, en el recurso de amparo al Tribunal Constitucional, solicitamos medidas cautelares para frenar el constante acoso que sufren tanto empresas como usuarios de nuestro país, y exigimos al Congreso de los Diputados un debate público y técnico sobre los límites del control en la red, siguiendo la iniciativa propuesta recientemente por el diputado Néstor Rego.

[Arnaud Bertrand @RnaudBertrand]

If you need just 2 charts to understand just how disconnected from reality the Trump administration's narrative and actions are, these are it.

If you were to listen to them, you'd think that the "China shock" de-industrialized America and, in the words of Scott Bessent himself (in his interview yesterday with Tucker Carlson), that "China's export level relative to their GDP" are so out of proportion that "we've never seen anything like this".

The only problem is that none of this is true.

Which is a big problem because when you act upon a wrongful understanding of reality, your actions will at best be ineffective, at worst be self-harmful.

The truth is that China is actually NOT anywhere near an "export economy". They export a lot in absolute terms, that's true, but as a percentage of their GDP China actually depends surprisingly little on exports.

Have a look yourself: https://t.co/GQMeKvxh9k China is 159th out of 195 countries in the world when it comes to the importance of exports in relation to their GDP. Exports represent 19.74% of their GDP when the world average is 29.27%.

Germany for instance can be said to be an "export economy": exports represent 47.14% of their GDP. Or South Korea at 44%. But China? Definitely not.

So the notion that tariffs on the whole world and a major disruption in global trade would be uniquely harmful to China is completely wrong. In fact China will be one of the countries out there that's the least impacted by this.

You should be much more worried about Germany or South Korea, for instance.

Similarly, the notion that it is the "China shock" or the era of neoliberal free trade that "stole good-paying manufacturing jobs" in America is just as wrong.

Check the chart: both NAFTA and China joining the WTO had virtually no impact on the manufacturing share of U.S. employment: it just continued on the same downward trend it had been in since the beginning of the 1950s.

Which means that it makes no sense to solve a problem with trade policies when it has very little to do with trade in the first place. It's like treating a patient's broken leg with heart medication. The diagnosis is wrong, so the prescription can't possibly work.

Heck, in this case, the prescription will even probably be detrimental to the patient: by definition, to manufacture more stuff, you need the customers for it. And tariffs will lower disposable incomes at home (because they're a tax on consumers and businesses) and reduce the market for U.S. products abroad.

And not only will the tariffs reduce U.S. companies' customer base, they'll also dramatically increase their costs.

Think of a company like Apple that has invested tens of billions developing intricate supplier networks spanning dozens of countries—networks that would take 5-10 years minimum and astronomical costs to replicate domestically. They can either absorb the massive tariff costs—severely impacting their profitability—or pass these costs to consumers through higher prices, making their products less competitive globally.

So what should be done? First of all to solve a problem, you need to be clear on what the problem is.

Is the problem that manufacturing jobs have disappeared? If that's the case, I have bad news for you: they're not coming back, ever. The real reason why they disappeared is automation and productivity gains so, unless you want an America populated by sweatshops and assembly lines early 20th century style, you probably don't want this.

If the problem however is that the U.S. is losing its competitive edge in advanced manufacturing and emerging industries - which is an actual thing - then the last thing the U.S. should do is its current policy of autarkic tariffs.

No country that is currently on the cutting edge of advanced manufacturing - be it China, Germany or South Korea - did it through tariffs. They did it via patient decades-long investments in education, infrastructure, massive public R&D support, long-term industrial policy, etc.

And, in most cases, they did it by opening themselves up to the world, with free trade. China's EV and smartphones successes is a perfect example of that: did they succeed by shutting their door to Tesla and Apple? No, on the contrary: they did so by welcoming them with open arms because they understand that to beat the best, you actually need to compete with the best.

At the end of the day, America's greatest vulnerability doesn't come from abroad but from within, specifically its growing inability to distinguish between its own simplistic propaganda and reality.

Of course it's much more comforting to tell yourself that China "stole" your manufacturing jobs and to believe in the silver bullet of tariffs. And it's certainly more politically expedient to promise quick fixes than to explain that transforming industrial capacity requires decades of consistent investment in education, infrastructure, and R&D.

Unfortunately, it's not true.

[Principia Marsupia @pmarsupia]

¿De dónde se ha sacado Trump las tarifas que dice que otros países le imponen a EEUU?

Porque no tienen nada que ver con la realidad. Son números absurdos. No son tarifas.

Aquí explican cómo los han calculado. Simplemente han hecho (importaciones - exportaciones)/importaciones.

[SiL - Friki Mamá @MellamanSiL]

Adolescencia es la serie de la que todos hablan, y es curioso porque de muchas cosas de la serie he hecho docenas de hilos.

Os cuento mi visión sobre lo que he visto y algunas reflexiones (HAY SPOILERS).

Esto es largo 😂+

[pablo @eltonecas]

@david_bonilla Pero ese sería otro análisis no? La gráficas sí comparan peras con peras que es “variación porcentual del PIB” y la representación de los datos está mal