@groingsid@saintjavelin Meaning "I don't know how to properly engage with people who make facially idiotic statements". If you believe there are only two possible choices; A) roll over and give him what he wantsB) keep goading a nuclear armed power with more and more provocative attacks,then π€ͺ
@willchamberlain FAFO is still undefeated. Trump should get all the retards and foreign agents who goaded him into this fiasco, get Elon to build a huge rocket, and fire them directly into the Sun.
@LeatherPaddy@ChristianCath1 It is a bit absurd to claim that people will be damned for violating a rule that has only existed since 1983, isn't it? What about the thousands of people over the course of the previous 1950 years? Are they damned ex post facto? Be serious.
@LeatherPaddy@ChristianCath1 When did the SSPX claim to "be Pope"? That seems absurd on its face, as the Pope is an individual, and the SSPX is an organisation. I think you made that one up.
@ChristianCath1 I am an historian, but I am not enough of a Church historian to know whether there has ever been a time in church history when significant portions of the laity were so involved in anathematising their fellow laymen and holding forth publically on matters theological, as today.
@polititrolls@saintjavelin You assume.
Would the underlings of Starmer, Macron or Trump be willing to go to MAD to revenge Ukraine? Sounds even less likely than in Russia. I omit Netanyahu from this calculus, since I do believe they are fanatical enough to do it.
@SeanMODomhnaill@saintjavelin Is the UK, France, the USA or Israel going to nuke Moscow in retaliation? If not, then nothing.
My point was not that Russia will nuke Ukraine, and certainly not that they should, but that they could. And if certain parties want to push up the escalation ladder, it increases the%