🚨 Bella hadid slams Israeli minister Ben Gvir
“Ben Gvir quite possibly could be the worst, most ugly hearted, disgusting human on the face of the planet
You are a nasty nasty human being with a nasty nasty heart. To laugh at pain is a disgrace. The hate in your heart is infuriating, but God will be the judge one day for you.”
Assume the movie had flopped and the director lost his entire $750,000 investment. How many crew members would have voluntarily returned their fees to help offset his loss?
This is the fundamental asymmetry in risk and reward. When someone puts up their own capital and shoulders the real financial risk especially in a high-failure industry like entertainment they alone bear the downside.
Yet the moment the project succeeds, suddenly everyone who was paid upfront wants a bigger piece of the pie. The same people who would not have shared in the loss now feel entitled to share disproportionately in the upside.
If you accept payment for your work regardless of outcome, you’ve already been compensated for your risk (or lack thereof). Why should the person who risked everything not be allowed to reap the rewards when their gamble pays off?