SH ℹ️

Not active

[SH ℹ️ @emotionexplode]

@KillaKreww The real reason was that her ex paid Melissa Nathan to smear her. The rest was just dumb people being dumb.

[SH ℹ️ @emotionexplode]

Messi is unstoppable even at the age of 38. What a legend.

[SH ℹ️ @emotionexplode]

@repositionss I’m sorry of this is a stupid question but what does wall mean in this context?

[. @taylorcoded]

broke and no career… i know the tiktok ladies who were fighting for his life are mad as hell.

[Marge Gunderson @CareyCareyyaya]

Getting Tatiana Siegel AND Bryan Freedman to shoot for you shows exactly who you are

[SH ℹ️ @emotionexplode]

@JayLB174383 @ShakeLS You fell for a smear campaign

[The Critical Drinker @TheCriticalDri2]

Just Hugh Laurie eloquently destroying another clueless "journalist". What a perfect start to the week.

[SH ℹ️ @emotionexplode]

@jan_murray @QcWynter @unherd Unfortunately it’s obvious that you despise yourself. You just project it onto others.

[SH ℹ️ @emotionexplode]

@jan_murray @bennetthaselton @hughlaurie @unherd If you don’t want to be called X, don’t be an X.

[SH ℹ️ @emotionexplode]

@PrincessKikiM98 Nothing. He has done absolutely nothing! Blake and Ryan on the other hand have raised hundreds of thousands of dollars (if not millions) for various charities throughout the years.

[SH ℹ️ @emotionexplode]

@TainaBorrero @nyknicks Thank you for your continuous support for survivors 🙏🏻

[SH ℹ️ @emotionexplode]

@YanaLukeman @SFFNY @vmmaloney @TainaBorrero How amazing 🤩 You’re all wonderful people

[Kiki @PrincessKikiM98]

It is consistently disheartening to witness individuals such as Victoria Burke, who championed and authored California’s survivor protection legislation, betraying those they advocated for, including Blake Lively. By opposing the very principles she fought for on behalf of survivors of sexual assault, harassment, and abuse, Burke’s actions are deeply concerning.

Regrettably, this betrayal is not unexpected. Burke’s actions reveal a lack of moral integrity and a willingness to compromise her values for personal gain. She has demonstrated a disregard for women like Blake Lively, who seek the same protection she tirelessly advocated for by writing the survivor protection law.

Burke’s betrayal extends beyond Blake Lively, affecting numerous women who rely on the law she authored. She has engaged in inappropriate interactions with individuals such as Kjersti Flaa, Megyn Kelly, and Billy Bush. Notably, Kelly recently defended sexual predator Jeffrey Epstein, while Bush famously laughed as Trump bragged about sexually assaulting women on tape. Burke’s actions have exposed her true nature, proving that she is susceptible to being influenced by external forces. https://t.co/aWaQKqvREV

[SH ℹ️ @emotionexplode]

@Lawyeredup1 @innercitypress The statute specifically says the burden of proving malice is on the plaintiff (Wayfarer parties) beyond just conclusory pleadings of “she lied”. Wayfarer conceded this in their latest filing.

[SH ℹ️ @emotionexplode]

@Lawyeredup1 @innercitypress The earliest stage in Wayfarer v. Lively or any other defamation claim against a victim/survivor for statements regarding sexual abuse and retaliation.

I don’t know what you mean by the second part. You’re saying if they hadn’t, this wouldn’t have been the case. But they did.

[SH ℹ️ @emotionexplode]

@Lawyeredup1 @innercitypress No, because this is the first impression of this law so there hasn’t been any instances one way or another. But 47.1 intention is exactly to grant relief at earliest stage possible, preferably before discovery.

[SH ℹ️ @emotionexplode]

@KassidyOC @innercitypress By failing to raise the issue in their 47.1 briefing.

[SH ℹ️ @emotionexplode]

@HollaBucks @schatow @innercitypress He knows https://t.co/whuQchyhK3

[SH ℹ️ @emotionexplode]

@iv33636 @innercitypress Oh please. As if I can’t spot a Baldummy by a mile.

[SH ℹ️ @emotionexplode]

@iv33636 @innercitypress Are you brainless? It’s obvious the reporting is inaccurate. In the next tweet he says punitive damages “under 34” which is again very obviously not what Gottlieb said. The correct one is “under 3294”