merav

[J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling]

My position is that gender dysphoria is a real, painful condition and that for some adults, the only way they may feel able to resolve that inner conflict is transition. If that’s the road they choose I wish them long life and happiness and I would vigorously oppose any discrimination against them when it comes to employment, housing or voting rights.

I do not believe children have the capacity to consent to treatments that may leave them infertile and, in some cases, anorgasmic. Multiple studies have shown that gender dysphoria in childhood and adolescence is not uncommon, for gay kids particularly, but it also occurs in, for example, straight girls who hate the idea of becoming women and sometimes, tragically, in children who’ve been abused. The available evidence shows that in the majority of cases, gender dysphoria resolves after the person has gone through adolescence. I am strongly opposed to the experimental treatment of blocking puberty in dysphoric children. I believe trans activists have behaved hugely unethically and irresponsibly in pretending that there is good evidence that these treatments are beneficial (there isn’t), that puberty blockers are completely reversible (there is a mounting body of evidence to suggest they aren’t) or that children are likely to kill themselves if denied blockers (there is no evidence to support this and suicide prevention charities warn against making such statements, due to the very real danger of suicide contagion.)

Of course, not all trans-identified people are dysphoric. Erotic transvestism, also known as autogynephilia, (getting a sexual thrill out of dressing as/pretending to be a woman) has been around for a very long time. I believe lesbians are entitled to exclude straight, cross-dressing men from their dating pools without being accused of bigotry and worse (same goes for gay men with trans-identified women). It’s profoundly homophobic to attack gay people for being same-sex attracted.

I don’t believe anyone, adult or child, is ‘born in the wrong body.’ That is an unfalsifiable, quasi-religious belief. A person may *feel* as if they’re in the wrong body, but humans cannot literally change sex. However they identify, men don’t belong in the single-sex spaces for which women fought so hard.

[Jean Hatchet @JeanHatchet]

Remember when the likes of @Bushra1Shaikh suggested Jews/Mossad had set fire to their own ambulances and other ridiculous “false flag” declarations.

Couldn’t possibly just be Jew hate?

Except. The men have admitted they are guilty and they don’t seem like Mossad to me. Not with these names: Hamza Iqbal, 20, Rehan Khan, 19, Judex Atshatshi, 18, and Saif Ali,18.

Any apologies? Anyone?

[Nuriyah Khan @nuriyahk]

My interview with @visegrad24 has barely been out 10 minutes and someone from the “religion of peace” is already calling for my death. Thank you for proving my point.

[Dr. Dr. P: "I said what I said". @Psychgirl211]

Ps: @labourlewis has blocked me for calling him out.

Whatever you do, please don't share the below post.

We can't be having a pile-on of this man, now, can we?

[Dr. Maalouf ‏ @realMaalouf]

TERRIFYING: During a TikTok live battle, an Algerian Muslim influencer asks a girl why she’s wearing a cross. She says she’s a Lebanese Christian.

He then becomes enraged and says he’d spit on her, and threatens to rape her and kill her, declaring that Christians deserve nothing but to be tortured in this world and the afterlife.

He has half a million followers and has illegally arrived in France via Spain just a few days ago.

This is Islam. And this is how much they hate Christians. Imagine when they become the majority.

[Max Klinger @MaxE2review]

I studied sociology at Cambridge. The reality is that Sociology, along with large swathes of the rest of the social 'sciences', is a discipline full of woke-left activists, including many open communists, who get funded to produce complete, ideologically-driven bollocks. Examples: 1) Glaciology research is dominated by 'masculine, colonial viewpoints', so we should merge feminist critical theory with ice science🤔

2) Expecting people to turn up to places on time is a form of 'white supremacy'.

3) Expecting people to get the correct answers on maths tests in a form of, you guessed it, 'white supremacy'.

4) 'whiteness' should be analysed as a literal "atmospheric phenomenon"

5) Certain ethnic minority groups performing worse than white groups in education proves the education system is racist in favour of white kids. But other minority groups performing better than white kids doesn't prove there isn't systemic racism.

6) Telling kids to remove their hoods in class is racist.

I could go on and on.

Obviously there is *some* (a small amount) sociological research that isn't complete crap but vast swathes of it are just pure, fraudulent dogma that's been dressed up as serious academic thought and gets laundered through the academy and presented as 'hard evidence' of non-existent oppression. And it's then repeated by the media and politicians.

I am working to expose this through my work. Follow on here for updates.

[Shelley Blond @BlondShelley]

Is this normal acceptable behaviour for a Senior Corporate Communications manager in the Government?
@cabinetofficeuk @UKCivilService @andyburnham @CabinetOffice @10DowningStreet

[Max Klinger @MaxE2review]

Message sent to me by a PhD STEM student at a UK University. Read this one to the end. This is going on all across the country. Is a major scandal.

‘Hi Max…In one case, a student conducted work examining health-related outcomes in black and ethnic minority individuals. When the study produced null results, showing that the hypothesised disparity did not exist, they struggled to reconcile the findings with their prior assumptions. Instead of revising their hypothesis or considering alternative explanations, they attributed the outcome to racism and shifted toward qualitative methods that enabled them to reinterpret the results in a way that supported their original narrative.

These researchers appear to benefit from increased funding opportunities, and there is very little scope to challenge their assumptions because of the fear of being labelled racist or ostracised from the academic community.

In tutorials with undergraduate students, I often feel I have to handle benign discussions with extreme caution so as not to trigger sensitivities that are continually reinforced by institutional messaging that emphasises racial group-differences and vulnerability.’

[Dan Burmawi @DanBurmawy]

Before I left Islam, I was debating a Sudanese Christian who challenged me to name one good thing about Muhammad. Just one.

I thought: easy. We Muslims practically worship Muhammad as the greatest man who ever lived.

So I tried to recall good qualities, honesty, compassion, mercy, love, anything, any single story, and I couldn’t remember one.

So I went to Google and typed: “the qualities of the Prophet.”

Islamic websites came up, and I thought, good, now I’ll have plenty of examples for this guy.

I opened them and was stunned: even the Islamic websites offered no good qualities in the sense he’d challenged me to find.

They praised his courage in spreading Islam, his fighting of Allah’s enemies, his physical strength, and his strictness.

Not one of the qualities the man had asked for.

Even the famous mercy at Mecca, sparing the people who had supposedly persecuted him, turned out to be for strategic reasons.

And when I started digging into the Quran and the sira for myself, I found that he married a child, he took Safiyya, a Jewish woman, the same day he killed her father, her brother, and her husband, trading his companion Dihya seven other captives for her, and posting a guard by the tent in case she tried to avenge them while raping her.

He had the men of the Jewish tribe beheaded, down to boys checked for pubic hair.

He raided trade caravans and took other tribes’ treasures.

He lied and broke truces he asked for.

He slept with all of his 9 wives the same night.

He killed anyone who mocked him.

He recruited raiders with the promise of other cities’ women.

And when his own fighters hesitated to touch married captives, because their husbands were alive and watching, Muhammad told them it was fine because allah said so.

Even the pagans of Arabia had higher morality than he did.

Every one of these acts was stamped with Allah’s approval.

He even married his adopted son’s wife by divine decree.

And this is just the tip of the iceberg.

I left Islam when I met this disgusting man, a man who turned his qualities into a religion, transmitted it to every generation of Muslims since, and made himself the ceiling of their morality.

This is the man Mamdani wants you to learn from.

[BostonTea @BostonTea84]

Roland G. Fryer jest rzadkim przykładem czarnego profesora topowego uniwerku, który dostał się na uczelnię nie za kolor skóry, ale za pracę naukową. Nie był oszustem, nie był plagiatorem, nie był obłąkanym mitomanem. Jego problem polegał na tym, że zrobił badania i uzyskał wyniki, które nie spodobały się władzom na uniwersytecie ani lewicowym aktywistom kontrolującym kampus. Mówimy tutaj o Uniwersytecie Harvarda.

"Jeden z kolegów wziął mnie na stronę i powiedział, żebym tego nie publikował, bo zrujnuję swoją karierę. Nie posłuchałem go i opublikowałem, i potem przez miesiąc pod moim domem stała policja, a na zakupy chodziłem z uzbrojoną ochroną. Kupowałem pieluchy dla dziecka w towarzystwie ochroniarza z bronią."

Groźby śmierci wysyłane przez lewicowych fanatyków to jedno. Drugą kwestią jest reakcja władz uczelni. Krótko po publikacji artykułu pojawiły się zarzuty, że Fryer flirtuje z pracownicami w swoim laboratorium EdLabs. Wytknięto mu "niepożądane zachowania o charakterze seksualnym" (głównie werbalne, w tym żarty). Harvard zawiesiła go na dwa lata bez wynagrodzenia, zamknął laboratorium i nałożył ograniczenia. Fryer przeprosił za nieodpowiednie żarty, zaprzeczył jednak zarzutom o molestowanie.

Nie napisałem jeszcze, co takiego odkrył Fryer, że rozwścieczył lewicowych cerberów politycznej poprawności. Otóż odkrył, że amerykańska policja wcale nie strzela i nie zabija czarnych częściej niż białych i że użycie broni przez policje warunkowane jest zachowaniem podejrzanego.

Tak, dobrze przeczytaliście. Tyle wystarczy, aby na Harvardzie chcieli cię zabić.

[The Spectator @spectator]

Cambridge University's education faculty – former home of Jason Arday – has appointed as assistant research professor who wrote that Muslims should study engineering and computers 'to produce advanced weaponry for Jihad in order that the deen [Islam] may dominate over all other deens.'.

Two weeks ago we covered one chapter Ahmed wrote in a Hizb pamphlet – published in 2002, and republished in 2017 (Ahmed was not involved in the republication) – where she attacked ‘western education’ as a ‘threat’ to Muslims, condemned democracy and integration, and criticised British schools for teaching pupils that child marriage is wrong.

However, the same pamphlet includes a second, even more radical chapter, co-written by Ahmed and another senior Hizb activist, Nazreen Nawaz, head of its women’s section.

This describes Hizb’s plan to create a fully Islamic education system as part of the Islamic dictatorship, the Khilafah, which is its core goal. As the chapter puts it: ‘nothing will be contained within the curriculum that contradicts with Islam, such as the teaching of the ideas of freedom, nationalism, democracy or evolution in a positive light’.

‘Nor can there be any schools established on any other religion, sect or race… Even the non-Muslims need to be educated under the educational curriculum of Islam… by pushing them to think about the correct belief in life.’

✍️ Andrew Gilligan

Article | https://t.co/qXmQuMzTbM | @mragilligan

[T.L. Donoghue @TLDwrites]

Sharia mortgages UK are interest free for religious purposes. They pay part rent and part of capital off to Sharia bank who buy the property on their behalf, lease it back but no interest, so capital paid off monthly by rent.
If the home owner falls on hard times as so many do, welfare paid by taxpayers will cover their entire repayment (rent) thus not only are we paying for them to live here we are buying the house for them..
Its really not ok as Sharia Law has no legal jurisdiction in UK; or so we are told..
Taxpayers are funding our own demise.
Suicidal empathy

[Luke LRPS @LukeLRPS]

If it wasn’t for Genevieve, AUSTRALIANS wouldn’t know that this insane AUSTRALIAN judge Nola Karapanagiotidis sentenced a father who repeatedly raped his own 5 year old daughter and broadcast it to pedophiles online to just 2.5 years in a WOMEN’S PRISON.

No Australian press covered the case at the time. None.

The
@JacintaAllanMP Victorian
government tried to cover up both the heinous crime, the fact that male sex offenders are being housed in Victorian women’s prisons AND that “trans” is a mitigating factor/defence in Australian courts.

Thank you Gen. Donated.

[Max Klinger @MaxE2review]

Having studied this stuff at Cambridge, I'm now on a one-man mission to expose the sheer, unimaginable levels of fraudulence and grift within academia. This is even more important now that the people who produce this stuff are trying to attack anyone who does so as 'racist' etc. Here are a few real examples of claims made by esteemed, frequently cited, well paid academics in prestigious journals:

1)Expecting maths students to get the correct answers is racist, and is a form of 'white supremacy culture' as it places an absolute emphasis on getting a single 'right answer'

2)'Time' is a racist concept, and expecting people to arrive on time is racist and a form of, you guessed it, 'white supremacy' (again)

3)Donald Duck cartoons are a key means by which American imperialism operates

4)Childrens' cartoons and pop music are tools of capitalistic domination

5)E = MC squared is a 'sexed equation'

6) Telling kids to take their hoods off in class is racist

There are so many more I don't even know where to begin. I'll be putting more out on here in the coming days. Jason Arday's death was tragic. But it can't be used to stifle legitimate criticism of this absolute racket.

Follow on here for updates.

[Baba Banaras™ @RealBababanaras]

She was not a woman, but a devil in the guise of a woman.

She threatened the female Israeli hostages to convert in Islam. When they refused,she instigated the terrorists to rape them.

Hamas terrorist Fatna al-Sahar killed in an Israeli strike near the police HQ in Gaza City.

[Venice Allan @roseveniceallan]

Unison, who designed their branding with suffragette colours to represent their female majority membership, are now campaigning to change the law to force women to get naked in front of men.

[Jonatan Pallesen @jonatanpallesen]

This was a very interesting interview with a Somali Muslim man here in Denmark. His honesty tells us what we must do.

This man, Abdi Khan is a refugee, who lives on welfare in Denmark with his large family, all paid for by the Danish taxpayers.

He hates Denmark. He has a social media profile that is very active and has many followers, in which he constantly denigrates Denmark and the Danes. He also vastly prefers Somalia, and often travels back there.

So they ask him if this doesn't seem ungrateful, and why he doesn't move back.

His answer is interesting, and actually makes decent sense.

1.
He wouldn't like to move back, because he wouldn't be as economically secure. This is true, since he would lose most of the very generous welfare he and his family gets here in Denmark. He says that he would move out if he was paid half a million Euros. Which to the interviewers sounds outrageously high, but which I think is a good estimate from him of the price at which it would make sense for him and his family to leave Denmark. (And would in fact be a good deal for Denmark as well. Somali immigrants with families are far, far more costly than that over time.)

2.
To the question about if he doesn't feel bad about being received by Denmark as a refugee, and living off our exceedingly generous welfare, while at the same time denigrating us, he makes a distinction between Denmark and the international conventions.

He thinks that Denmark and the Danes are evil and islamophobic, and would in fact prefer not to do these things. But he points out that it's his rights given to him by the international conventions that result in this situation. Not the charity of the Danes, but the international conventions, such as the Refugee Conventions and the European Convention of Human Rights. So he feels zero gratitude towards Denmark. He also says that if Denmark ever left the international conventions, he would go back voluntarily.

As I wrote, the interviewers find what he says highly objectionable, and do not hold back with their critique of this man. But I think what he is saying makes sense from his perspective.

If (very) hypothetically I was offered asylum by Somalia, and also assuming hypothetically that they had freedom of speech there, I would behave in the same way as he does. I would not hold back on criticizing their barbaric female genital mutilation. The fact that they helped me would not make me hold back on this critique. Like me, Abdi Khan stands for what he believes in. Which just in his case happens to be Islamism.

Also, unlike a very large number of other Somali immigrants, it doesn't seem like he is a violent criminal. The Danish media seems to think that he is an example of how wrong Somali immigration can go, but in fact there are many far worse than him.

----

What this man makes very clear with his arguments is that the international conventions are broken. They result in us paying millions to host people who despise us and despise our values, and do everything in their power to work against us. Even though both them and us would strongly prefer them living in their own Muslim countries.

[Dries Van Langenhove @DVanLangenhove]

Rector Paul De Sutter, who goes by 'Petra' nowadays (shielding him from criticism), is an insult to science itself.

He hates real scientists and truth. Paul even denies the existence of binary biological sex. When I had a debate with him on national television about transgenderism, he lost badly and tried to get me kicked out of university out of spite.

Paul, leading member of the far-left Green Party, is also extremely incompetent. During his four year tenure as minister responsible for state companies, our two biggest state companies Bpost (postal services) and Proximus (telecom services) lost respectively 80% and 65% of their market value.

Paul did not only commit plagiarism himself, he is also is guilty of everything he accuses others of. In 2024, days before the election, he accused me of having stalked and threatened a minor 'trans boy' (= girl). This was a complete and utter lie, but in collaboration with the media, the lie ran for days, influencing the election outcome. After I filed a complaint with police for defamation, Paul quietly retracted his statements, but never corrected them. That's how much of a coward he is. In any case, he should go to jail for deliberately, wrongfully accusing a political opponent of a heinous crime.

Paul's university, Ghent University, illegally kicked me out as a student and as a member of the Board of Governors because I exposed their war on truth. I went to court and won, but as a response to my victory, they launched a barrage of lawfare suits on taxpayers money, and even though I won most, they forced me to pay endless legal fees in a battle of attrition.

This is only a small fraction of the criminal and despicable behaviour of the clique running Ghent University. This is the scum that is now kicking @nathancofnas out because he did what EVERY scientist should have done: expose lies and spread truth.

[Nervana Mahmoud @Nervana_1]

They tried to reach Gaza from Egypt and failed

Now they are trying to reach the West Bank through Iraq and Jordan, but they are stuck at the Iraqi border.

The pro-Palestine have discovered that the “Arab Ummah” is pure myth.

Welcome to reality cuties

[merav @emunah97]

@ThePosieParker @pritipatel Your post does not make sense. I’ve paid UK taxes from the day I landed on Blighty (& never claimed a penny from welfare) & own my home here. Taxation = right to representation & citizenship. How will renouncing citizenship of my birth country (not India) be of benefit to anyone?