@Robotbeat@RyanTScott@exploreplanets@ASGSRSpace@JZK60@BillNye For sure, it’d be great to do more research. But NASA biology has a *tiny* budget that certain people are currently trying to reduce even further. If we want more research, we have to fund it. People should call their representatives and voice their support!
@Robotbeat@RyanTScott@exploreplanets@ASGSRSpace@JZK60@BillNye Would you mind clarifying “partial gravity” a bit? I’m not sure I follow. NASA Bio does, coordinates, &/or collaborates on tons of research in microgravity and Earth analogues thereof, so I’m curious what you see as the gap (it’d be great to do more ofc but they’re under-funded)
@Robotbeat@RyanTScott@exploreplanets@ASGSRSpace@JZK60@BillNye NASA Biology produces a lot of research into countermeasures for space hazards. It also achieves a huge ROI by coordinating volunteer research efforts by external scientists around the world and maintaining/curating standardized public-access space science datasets
@vipintukur An interesting possibility! It’ll be interesting to see the extent to which the pathophysiology differs across people as we build up this body of research.
Save NASA GeneLab 🧬 ! If you care about space 🚀, or medical applications here on Earth 🧠, or both, help preserve GeneLab’s impact on biomedical discovery and open science, and its necessity for space exploration. https://t.co/An1SxnDYv5
@slsatel A big problem is that the presidential budget recommendation led to chaos, and now NASA GeneLab, which guides most of the biological research that would allow us to have a safe and fruitful moon colony, has been crippled. This pivot won’t fix that.
@SenBillCassidy I appreciate you continuing to make these posts despite them drawing criticism (which, frankly, are reasonable reactions given your confirmation vote). But public comments will fall flat if you don���t also rigorously exercise your oversight authority. Please protect HHS!
@robertskmiles I may remove it when I have a few more greys, but as I’m young-ish & only feel comfortable introducing myself aloud as “Elizabeth,” I include my degree in email signatures/usernames so people have at least 1 indicator of my career stage & don’t condescend in professional settings
@Lazza_Aussie@simonmaechling I agree dismissive labels can be harmful. To modify your analogy, it’s like a bunch of different scientists tested the drink over & over using all different methods, & having found nothing, we suggest we look elsewhere to find what made you sick, maybe your air or food or genes
@DoozerDiffuser@simonmaechling Yes, but the point of this is when a speculation fails time and time and time again to turn up any evidence, eventually we need to stop putting a bunch of time and money into that speculation. And we certainly shouldn’t let that speculation drive public policy and discourse.