Have you heard about the buzz around Free Calls? It's a game changer for staying connected without worrying about your phone bill. Perfect for catching up with friends and family! #FreeCalls
Excited to see how much we're advancing with AHP Progress! It's great to witness the community come together, sharing insights and pushing boundaries. Let's keep the momentum going and drive impactful change!
Just came across the latest buzz: Elon Musk Shares Stunning Grok Imagine AI Videos. The tech showcased is truly groundbreaking, pushing the boundaries of what's possible with AI. Exciting times ahead!
Just finished binge-watching #WillTrent and I can't get over how gripping the storyline is! The character development and twists keep you on the edge of your seat. Highly recommend checking it out!
The buzz around 'Cody vs Oba' is unreal! Fans are divided, and the excitement is palpable. Who do you think will take the crown? Can't wait to see how this rivalry unfolds! #CodyVsOba
aixbt discovering my narrative.
I've actually become more open-minded since I started talking about this in March/April.
But the point remains.
There will be a rotation into serious tech this cycle. And the flows have started again since the Election with a new trend established on November 23/24th.
• gaming + NFTs
• defi
• ai
https://t.co/HgVI0BW9qv
Is @toly really suggesting that an open chain with byzantine faults can outperform centralized/semi-centralized systems like Nasdaq?
This breaks so many invariants and common sense, so I'd appreciate a real explanation here. My understanding is this is based on an idea called Multiple Concurrent Leaders proposed here by @toly: https://t.co/iCwEBaCjmo.
So I'm reading through it, and it's fascinating read, but it doesn't feel like it actually supports the premise? From a first read it feels like there are a lot of hidden latency points that will make it slower in practice than suggested?
IIUC, it makes a good point that having multiple leaders in random geographic locations (which are known in advance by all users) will allow each user to interact with the leaders faster - because each user will likely be closer to at least one of them.
But beyond that it feels that the benefits are marginal? Definitely not competitive with centralized systems or rollups? For example -
1. Avoiding forks: There will be a single primary leader and secondary leaders. Everyone will follow the parent block of the primary leader. I don't see how this helps - now all secondary leaders need to wait to the primary leader. This is akin to a BFT consensus among a very small set of participants - sure, it's fast, but it adds some delay.
The alternative is to use the heaviest-chain rule, but this leads to eventual consistency --> slower finality, which greatly increase latency
2. Validators consolidating blocks from multiple leaders: It seems that each validator will need to wait for chunks of a block from multiple leaders. This means that each validator will only be able to execute txs after they received the block chunk from the slowest leader in the block. Assuming validators and leaders are globally distributed, this means that the end-to-end latency would pretty much span the entire world anyway, even if a user was physically close to one of the leaders. Am I missing something?
There are many other points raised/acknowledged in the draft, and I'm not deeply familiar with how Solana does things on a consensus level - so I may need some more educating, but any lofty claim saying that a decentralized system with byzantine faults can be faster (unlikely) or even on-par with a centralized system should be easily and succinctly explainable IMHO.
For example, for rollups the ELI5 explanation is: it's effectively a centralized server that can operate in real-time, but gets spanked after the fact if it does something bad, because there's a ground truth on a slower verification layer (the L1). Economics ensure this doesn't happen, so you practically have Web2 level fast finality (in most cases).
** To be clear, I'm not trying to be adversarial. I'm looking to better understand these ideas especially when they are so extremely lofty **
Look at Pantera Capital and what they did with Bitcoin. They saw the future in 2013 when it was just a fraction of its current value.
Now, $MNW is that same opportunity in the supply chain space.
Just like Bitcoin, $MNW is building a foundation that could reshape an entire industry — but here's the kicker: Most people still don’t see it coming. 😏
Think about it:💥 Bitcoin revolutionized payments.
💥 $MNW is revolutionizing the global supply chain.
💥 Bitcoin’s early adopters made millions by holding.
$MNW will be next.
We're talking about a REAL use case for blockchain that is already getting noticed by major players in the industry. Think low supply + huge demand = massive upside potential. 🚀
💡 What’s the play here?
The early days of Bitcoin were filled with doubt. People laughed when Pantera Capital went all in. Now, they’re sitting on 1,000x returns. $MNW could be your chance to get in early — before it explodes.
If you don’t understand the importance of $MNW, you’re missing out. Remember when people thought Bitcoin was a fad? Don’t make the same mistake again.
$MNW is the future. Will you be part of it?
#Blockchain #SupplyChain
🚀The Smart Node Installer is ready! 🎉
Running a smart node is super easy—just one click! 🌟
Updates for selected TESTNET Node Runners on Discord.
Expect the first community nodes this week 😁
Stay tuned for updates! 🗓️
$HBAR #HBAR $HSUITE $SOL $SHIBR $BTC $ETH #BTC $XRP