$BTC can do this and still be fine
In fact this was my extreme case scenario I posted months back.
“Stink spot bids” at 30-40k incase of a big crash and v reversal
Whoever says ‘x price’ is impossible is clueless about markets
If I get stopped on my initial swing long, this is the play I will be waiting for next
$BTC ... Almost every bitcoin cycle low has all but traded around the 300 weekly MA
With the 2022 lows being the first time it traded beneath the bands for a short period.
I personally wouldnt mind it.. but lets see...
The chaos in El Salvador before Bukele was never an accident, and the chaos in Haiti today is not an accident either.
The media told you that the gangs were just poor boys who went bad on their own, but that story falls apart the moment you ask one simple question.
Where does a poor sixteen year old boy living in a slum with no job and no money get an AK-47 and an AR-15 and a Glock and thousands of rounds of ammunition, and where does he get a brand new Toyota Hilux and motorcycles and speedboats and drones and encrypted phones and bulletproof vests and night vision goggles, and who pays his monthly salary and pays for his safe house and pays his lawyer when he is arrested and pays the police and the judge and the prison guard to look the other way, and who pays his family when he dies?
A poor boy cannot afford even one bullet, so someone else is paying for all of it.
That someone is the multimillionaires and the billionaires and the wealthy entities who profit from chaos, because chaos is a business and a broken country is the most profitable business in the world.
When a country is in chaos its land becomes cheap so they can buy it, its gold and its drugs and its resources can be stolen without anyone asking questions, its government becomes weak so they can control it, and its people become so scared that they obey anyone who promises them a little safety.
In El Salvador the gangs were not fighting the system, the gangs were the system, paid to keep the poor terrorized so the poor would never rise up and demand a better country.
In Haiti it is the same story, the gangs are not independent, they are funded and armed and protected by rich families and foreign businessmen and foreign NGOs who want Haiti to stay weak so they can keep stealing its ports and its gold and its labour.
And when a man like Bukele comes and says I will lock up all the gangs and end this in two years, who attacks him? It is the same people.
The same billionaires who fund the gangs fund the media that calls Bukele a dictator, the same wealthy entities who arm the gangs fund the NGOs that cry human rights for murderers, the same people who profit from chaos fund the political voices that hate real help in Haiti and sabotage anyone who is actually capable of doing it.
Look at the pattern and it becomes clear, when a gang kills a hundred innocent people there is silence, but when a leader kills a hundred gang members there is outrage.
When a gang rapes children there is no campaign, but when Bukele locks up rapists there is a global campaign against him.
That is because the media is not independent, it is owned by billionaires, the NGOs are not independent, they are funded by billionaires, and the politicians are not independent, they are bought by billionaires.
They do not want Haiti saved and they did not want El Salvador saved, they want them broken, because a broken country is cheap to buy and easy to control.
Bukele exposed them, he proved that gangs can be destroyed in months if you have the will, and that terrified them, because if El Salvador can be fixed then Haiti can be fixed, and if Haiti can be fixed then Africa can be fixed, and if Africa can be fixed then the billionaires lose their business.
That is why they demonize Bukele, that is why they sabotage Haiti, that is why they hate any man who actually helps the poor.
🚨 Is Jane Street back to manipulating Bitcoin again?
Bitcoin has been getting crushed in Q4, and Jane Street's latest SEC filings reveal something interesting.
Just before the Q4 selloff began, Jane Street was aggressively increasing its Bitcoin ETF exposure.
During Q3:
• Fidelity Bitcoin ETF holdings jumped from 887K to 7.01 MILLION shares, worth $509 MILLION.
• BlackRock Bitcoin ETF holdings were worth another $957 MILLION.
• ARK Bitcoin ETF holdings reached around $249 MILLION.
By September 30, Jane Street held roughly $1.7 BILLION across these three Bitcoin ETFs.
Then Q4 began, and Bitcoin started getting hammered.
But the strange part is when the selling has been happening.
BTC has repeatedly faced heavy selling pressure around the U.S. stock market open.
At the same time, the Coinbase premium has remained negative since late September.
Even when buying appeared on other exchanges, Bitcoin continued trading at a discount on Coinbase.
This shows persistent weakness in U.S. spot demand.
Now remember Jane Street's history.
In July 2025, India's market regulator took action against Jane Street over a strategy involving large stock purchases, bearish options positions and aggressive selling. SEBI identified around $567 MILLION in alleged unlawful gains.
Then, in February 2026, Jane Street faced a lawsuit over its trading during the Terra collapse.
There was also daily 10 AM selling pattern, which stopped after was sued by Tera.
Now look at what we're seeing again.
Jane Street built substantial Bitcoin ETF exposure in Q3.
Bitcoin started dumping repeatedly during U.S. trading hours in Q4.
Buying Bitcoin ETFs doesn't mean a trading firm is betting on higher prices.
It can hold those ETFs while taking much larger short positions through futures or options.
If Bitcoin falls, profits from those shorts can offset losses on the ETF holdings.
And if the short exposure is large enough, the firm could make money even during a major Bitcoin crash.
SO WAS JANE STREET ACTUALLY BULLISH ON BITCOIN IN Q3, OR WAS IT BUILDING ONE SIDE OF A MUCH BIGGER TRADE?
Its SEC filings show the ETF positions, but they don't reveal its full derivatives exposure during Q4.
There is no direct evidence connecting Jane Street to the recent Bitcoin dumps.
But given its previous trading controversies, the real question is whether Jane Street was also positioned to profit while Bitcoin was getting destroyed.
Market downturns are where I’ve always thrived and to consistently capitalise on them, particularly against bullish consensus, you have to be a ruthless mf tbh, disciplined and indifferent to popular opinion...
When I'm positioned for a market rollover, I couldn't care less who's on the other side or how desperately they need higher prices... their conviction isn't my responsibility, just as my losses aren't theirs when I'm wrong.
I have no attachment towards being bullish or bearish, no attachment to a narrative and no interest in seeking approval - the core tenants that matter for me are towards opportunity, asymmetry and capital preservation...
Delta neutrality is a position...
Not trading is a decision...
Cash is a position ... never underestimate the optionality of having cash
Trade the market in front of you, not the one you desperately want to see... or hanging your hopes on the views of others...
A hacker joked that Google paid her a $1.3 million bug bounty. Now Google's AI tells people she's a millionaire.
What happened:
• Google accidentally gave her edit access to her own bug report
• She changed the reward from $1,000 to $1,333,337 and tweeted it as a joke
• An hour later she posted that it wasn't real
• An AI-written Community Note got the story wrong
• An AI news podcast reported the bounty as real
• Now Google's AI Overview says she became a millionaire on November 7
She has never been a millionaire.
One joke tweet. Three AI systems. One fake "fact."
Before you trust an AI answer:
1. Click the sources under it
2. Check who wrote them and when
3. If every source traces back to one viral post, it's not confirmed