Calling this “empathy” is insane. You can believe postpartum mental health issues are serious and still draw a very clear line at killing three children.
If someone ends a relationship because their partner is publicly defending that, maybe it isn’t because they “don’t understand women.” Maybe they simply have a moral boundary.
Nossa mas como estou surpreso. Que coincidência. Se eu fosse malicioso eu diria que o Lula só é presidente porque o golpe de estado foi dado com toga ao anular as PROVAS da corrupção do Lula. Mas eu não digo isso acho quem fala isso é antidemocrático.
Young men, and especially young White men, did not ditch the workforce. They were intentionally excluded as a matter of policy.
The degree to which corporate America could discriminate against White men served as a benchmark for progress for many years.
Asking why there are no young men in the workforce, and particularly young White men, is like asking why there are no Germans in East Prussia anymore.
Why are so many women sooo angry? They won. They got everything they wanted. Men have never been doing this badly, and women have never been doing this well. They make more, they have the majority of jobs, they are the majority of college graduates, (UCLA undergrad is 60% female), they make more money, have much lower rates of suicide, addiction, and alcoholism, and live longer. They won: they took over all men-only spaces, they took over the Boy Scouts, they ended men’s bathrooms, they can fly fighter planes and be in combat. Marriage is optional, divorce is no-fault, they win 99% of the custody battles, they can control fertility at will, and they can’t get drafted. We are all living in the female future they promised.
Please take note of all the conservative influencers and commentators who are very eager to issue lectures to young right wing men and scold them for their spicy jokes and for the edgy podcasts they listen to, and yet are right now very very hesitant to deliver any rebuke to the legions of radicalized women openly celebrating a mass murderer of children. This tells everything you need to know. And when they pivot back to their breathless, theatrical denunciations of right wing males, be sure to ignore everything they say.
🚨Ao atacar a fonte, Moraes acabou com a liberdade de imprensa. Mas nunca basta: ao querer que jornalistas sejam carimbados por um diploma, os ministros agora querem acabar com a própria imprensa. Ambicionam o jornalismo estatal. Eu, por exemplo, já não poderia me expressar
Note that 38 male staff were also interviewed. As shown below, some male staff expressed concerns about Athena SWAN and female staff being favoured. Their concerns were, of course, reframed by the feminist authors as the male staff being hostile and in denial about gender inequality.
Misframing of male participant interview responses is now occurring regularly in gender studies "research." In 2025, I wrote an article @RealLastStand in which I give an example of an interview "study" of a fathers' group in which a male feminist academic took all the fathers' responses and turned them against them. See the article for the details:
https://t.co/aFu7PfWukn
Você faz questão de colocar na bio que é jornalista "de direita, conservadora" e aplaude Dino e Moraes tentando voltar com uma regra da Ditadura para validar uma violação ao sigilo da fonte de um jornalista. Pelo visto, corporativismo e reserva de mercado falaram mais alto que o seu "jornalismo de direita".
🚨 Muito curioso que ministros do STF, que chegam ao cargo por indicação política e interesses pessoais do presidente, e não por concurso, se achem no direito de meter o dedo na carreira dos outros para dizer que um diploma melhoraria o jornalismo.