It's shocking that this messaging appeals to anyone.
You have to be retarded think that Canada is at risk of joining the US or that this isn't pure cringe.
If you committ sodomy, oral copulation, or sexual pentatration against a minor you CAN run for office but against an adult you’re banned???
Greg Burt exposed the shocking amendments added to AB 2691 by Senator Scott Wiener before the Senate committee.
The committee passed the bill anyway.
AYES: Allen, Cervantes, Umberg, Wiener
NO: Choi
Throughout her dissent in the case protecting girls’ sports, Justice Jackson insists on using the phrase “sex assigned at birth.”
The principal dissent, authored by Justice Sotomayor, instead uses the phrase “sex identified at birth,” which is somewhat better misleading because it does not suggest that a doctor arbitrarily assigns a person’s sex. But it’s still inaccurate, given that sex is commonly detected before birth. The phrase attempts to create the impression that biological sex is simply a label applied at birth that is subject to change.
In reality, sex is established at conception and cannot change. There is nothing more intrinsic to who we are as individuals.
Justice Thomas criticized the wordplay employed by gender ideology in his concurrence: “To use language to obscure reality—to show indifference regarding the truth—is to lie to the public and cease to treat our fellow citizens as equals.”
You can tell they know they're full of 💩 by the way their headlines are perfectly crafted to hide the relevant truth.
Yes, states can technically "ban transgender girls and women from school athletic teams."
But they can only be banned from female teams, because they're males.
Imagine if I, a 40-year-old man, tried to play in a children's (ages 4-7) Tee Ball league and the state passed a law banning me from competing in the wrong age category, which the Supreme Court then upheld.
Would the Globe and Mail write a headline saying "Supreme Court allows states to ban men from sports teams"?
While it would be technically true that states are allowed to ban adult men from sports teams, leaving out which sports teams we're allowed to be banned from—teams designated for young children—is a pretty major omission!
Leaving out that centrally important detail can't be explained by accident or ignorance. Especially when the same detail is omitted from headlines across left-wing media outlets.
It's fully intentional. It's designed to obscure reality and mislead the public.
Justice Thomas said what many Americans have been saying all along: truth matters.
“To use language to obscure reality … is to lie to the public and cease to treat our fellow citizens ‘as equal[s].’”
@Aaronpete_@PierrePoilievre@X These people are ultimately anti democracy if they don't the broader public you to hear from the leader of the opposition who was narrowly defeated in the last federal election.
I am begging critics of the puberty blocker trial to stop getting lost in the weeds arguing about research ethics, Gillick competence, informed consent, fertility preservation and the like. The NHS’s refusal to complete the Data Linkage Study (DLS) before proceeding with a new trial is the ONLY argument worth making on this issue. Everything else is a distraction.
The DLS would find out what has happened to all the children who have already taken puberty blockers. There is NO justification for proceeding with a puberty blocker trial before the DLS is complete. The entire programme of future research in this area should be informed by its results. The fact that the NHS is getting ready to run a live experiment on vulnerable children before it has even established the fate of those it has already experimented on is utterly damning.
The deeply disappointing Dr Cass should be widely derided for her ridiculous comments on ‘harm reduction’. The DLS IS harm reduction. Critics of the trial must stop fighting on their opponents turf by quibbling over technical details. We need to relentlessly force the DLS onto the agenda and expose the shameful hypocrisy of the NHS. DO THE DLS.
#DotheDLS
https://t.co/HfdBR3L8tC
Pew Research put a quiz on r/politics and revealed the subreddit is 97% left leaning, with nearly half being the farthest left the poll counted.
Reddit is an echochamber, discourse is dead on that site.
NEWS: The Federal Trade Commission has just announced its lawsuit (with four states) against the World Professional Association for Transgender Health. 👇
Tobi, since a few Conservative MPs betrayed their constituents & joined the Liberals earlier this year, the Liberals have a majority.
Essentially they can initiate and pass any legislation they want.
The only thing that can stop them is public pressure.
But people barely even hear about these Bills because legacy media is covering for Carney / Liberals non-stop by scaring people with “orange man bad” never ending rhetoric.
The Government of Canada postponed the 2025 federal budget until November. But it is rushing Bill C-22, the Lawful Access Act, through committee before Parliament adjourns on June 19. Apparently, expanded surveillance powers are more urgent than the federal budget. Make it make sense.
I read your Quillette piece and listened to your interview after finding you on twitter recently. The way you handled everything is beyond exemplary.
I'm going to take advantage of at least one more parental leave before I drop the act. Luckily, my day-to-day is not impacted by the nonsense as much as yours was.
@Nick_Decap@_CryMiaRiver 6 years for myself in ENV. I'm waiting for my Oscar nomination. Two young kids and a wife prevent me from challenging anything in a meaningful way.