@9QJxni9QCLTrLGj@KELMAND1 ai 来回答你:这张图是经过恶意修改(P图)的伪造图片。💡 辨别真相的几个核心漏洞:字体边缘有明显的P图痕迹:如果你仔细观察“6元”这两个红色的字,会发现它的清晰度、光影和周围的“/小时”以及其他黑色字体有着明显的反差。它是直接用修图软件把原本的数字覆盖、篡改后打上去的。 [1]
DISGUSTING that an account, supposedly created to help Tibetans, would spread such malicious and obvious lies while hundreds of Tibetan families await news of missing loved ones.
The landslide and subsequent flood occurred in Nepal and flowed into China.
Why? Why are Western media outlets still doing this BS in 2026?
Shame on @Telegraph and @BBC for lying and claiming that Chinese is censoring footage and that Chinese citizens have no idea what’s going on in the country
The mudslides is EVERYWHERE all across Chinese social media. It’s astonishing that still in 2026 Western media outlets will use tragedy to sell clicks
100% misinformation and complete propaganda. This is the exact reason why no one trusts the media anymore
@Reuters ⚠️DISINFORMATION: The landslide and subsequent flood began in Nepal and surged into China. There is no way China could give early warning to Nepal for a disaster that occurred in Nepal and went on to kill many inside China, with many others, including tourists, still missing.
Treasury Secretary Bessent said the world cannot accept China's sustained $1.2 trillion trade surplus and will press G20 finance leaders to re-examine trade terms with Beijing, even as the US presses ahead with tariff cuts on $30 billion of non-strategic goods each side.
Wow, so why doesn't the U.S. leverage its strengths to get China—the world's largest and most powerful consumer market—to buy more American products? Tell me, which American goods should Chinese consumers be buying more of? Mobile phones, computers, cars, solar panels, ships, clothing, or something else entirely? Come on—all you really have to offer is more soybeans and french fries. You aren't even willing to manufacture decent national flags, Christmas trees, or fireworks; you’d rather just sit in offices manipulating cryptocurrencies, futures, stocks, and the media.
The world can't accept China's persistent, massive trade surplus? How, then, did the world cope with textile exports from the UK, automotive machinery from Germany, or cars and electronics from Japan and South Korea? How did the world handle U.S. arms sales and the petrodollar hegemony? South Koreans currently dominate the global high-end memory chip market, with profits this year far exceeding those of any other commodity.
Two hundred years ago, when you felt you "couldn't tolerate" China exporting vast quantities of tea, ceramics, and silk without importing your goods—a situation driven by China's small-scale agrarian economy and isolationist policies, which meant there was no need for Western imports—you blasted China's doors open with cannon fire. You amassed huge surpluses using a "commodity" called opium, and continued to plunder China's wealth through unequal treaties, territorial concessions, war reparations, and the establishment of foreign concessions.
And now, more than a century after opening up the Chinese market, you suddenly decide it's all unfair? You want to band together to change the rules of the game? China has never deliberately sought a trade surplus; it is your own arrogance, greed, and laziness that have caused you to lose your competitive edge.