Eric Martínez

Fellow @UChicagoLaw | Ph.D. @MITbrainandcog | J.D. @Harvard_Law

Law, language, cognition, AI

[Eric Martínez @ericgrimani]

Can AI ace law exams?

Last year, OpenAI announced GPT-4 got 90th percentile on the bar.

Here we (a) refute 90th percentile claim; (b) replicate/extend recent work on GPT capabilities; (c) discuss implications for law profession.

Now open, AI&Law: https://t.co/fX4cwr15gn
1/

[Saima Malik-Moraleda @saima_mm]

Now out in PNAS!

Link to the paper: https://t.co/1wZfFE7VHW

News story by MIT News: https://t.co/oO9m3Apvhl

[Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) @MIT]

MIT researchers found that legal language is intentionally complex, not for clarity, but to create a false sense of authority. Even lawyers prefer plain English. https://t.co/r7fxU6PTab

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

So true

[Dylan O'Sullivan @DylanoA4]

Think about this study a lot

[Hope Kean @HopeKean]

New paper with @alexanderdfung, @PramodRT9 , @jessica__chomik , @Nancy_Kanwisher, @ev_fedorenko on the representations that underlie our intuitive physical reasoning about the world. Thread 🧵about our new preprint 📄✨linked here: https://t.co/NbfYM6LeVs 1/10

[Anna Ivanova @neuranna]

David did a “scientist interview” with me his freshman year, and I immediately recruited him to help with our law in the brain project. So happy to see him advancing in his academic career! ✨

[McGovern Institute @mcgovernmit]

Congrats to the 4 MIT students who have been named 2025 Rhodes Scholars - esp David Oluigbo in @ev_fedorenko lab, who plans to apply AI to complex medical problems and systemic healthcare challenges. 🙌 https://t.co/SUX4jMrjVC

[neele engelmann @neele_engelmann]

Out now in Cognitive Science: We investigate how people think judges should handle immoral laws. Should judges follow the law no matter what, or can exceptions be made for (grossly) immoral laws? We surveyed 167 laypeople and 141 participants with legal training to find out.

[Ashley Thomas @ashleyjthomas_]

[Please retweet!] My paper, 'Cognitive Representations of Social Relationships and their Developmental Origins" has been accepted at Behavioral and Brain Sciences! I'm thrilled to be able to engage with people's commentary! Please consider writing one! https://t.co/Hk3p5FPPdq

[Institute for Law & AI (LawAI) @law_ai_]

Many AI governance stakeholders agree that certain laws or regulations should apply only to “frontier models.” But what is a “frontier model”? LawAI’s latest working paper discusses some of the most important legal considerations for efforts to define that term: https://t.co/JI2WUYYJ7J

[Sam Gershman @gershbrain]

@LanguageMIT and I are so pleased about this:
https://t.co/LA2wu9QVi3

Thanks to @HarvardLibrary @mitlibraries @mitpress for making this happen!

[Kyle Mahowald @kmahowald]

Our philosophy-informed LLM papers now out in TACL! See the improved paper or thread linked below for more on “bibliotechnism”, the referential ability of ngram models, what it means to say LLMs (or humans) have beliefs, beachgoing bardolaters, and more.

https://t.co/nrtn29379W

[Greta Tuckute @GretaTuckute]

Very humbled to be in such amazing company on this list... Congrats to everyone recognized!
So, so grateful for the support from my mentors and collaborators.

[Anna Ivanova @neuranna]

Excited to have been named one of @techreview's 35 under 35!

I am happy that, these days, language & human cognition are topics that the world cares deeply about (thanks to recent developments in AI). Not only are these topics impactful, they are also fun to study!

[Elizabeth Mieczkowski @beth_miecz]

🚨New preprint!🚨 My first first-author project with @RouseTurner @natvelali @cocosci_lab

How do people evaluate idle collaborators who don’t help out during group tasks?

TL;DR: Sometimes it’s okay not to help with the dishes 🧵👇

Link: https://t.co/9igIEOfHo8

[rosey🌹 @thechosenberg]

This applies to many more industries than law

[Tomer Ullman @TomerUllman]

Now out in Cognition!

➰"Ambivalence by Design: A Computational Account of Loopholes"➰

by Qian, Bridgers, Parece, @MayaTaliaferro, and me

https://t.co/MQdbvFUDje

[Steve Stewart-Williams @SteveStuWill]

MIT study explains why laws are written in an incomprehensible style. The convoluted “legalese” used in legal documents conveys a special sense of authority, and even non-lawyers have learned to wield it. https://t.co/0iC03nYR0A

[Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) @MIT]

Why are legal documents so impenetrable? Just as “magic spells” use special rhymes and archaic terms to signal their power, the convoluted language of legalese conveys a sense of authority, cognitive scientists have found. https://t.co/HFAk9RTRba

[Michael Blasie @MichaelBlasie]

New study: nonlawyer lawmakers "wrote in a more convoluted manner" perhaps to sound more "authoritative". So we maybe we can simplify laws without sacrificing content.
@PNASNews article by @UChicagoLaw's @ericgrimani, and profs at @UniMelb & @MIT
https://t.co/0BvnZQd03c