errelevant

Following the truth, wherever it takes me.

[errelevant @errelevant_t]

I find it really strange how some people seem to get turned on by pointing out that I have a low follower count. I don't get it... Am I supposed to feel bad about it or lesser or something like that? 🤔

It is almost always someone with a larger following who got offended by something I said somewhere, comes to my profile, points out that I have a low follower count, and then immediately blocks me. It's so strange... These people seem to derive a lot of validation from their follower count.

In case any of you are reading this, the majority of the few followers I have are bots (I can't control that), and I could have -1 million followers, and I still wouldn't care and I wouldn't change my behaviour either way. But if pointing out that I have very few followers is the only way you can get an erection, hey, you've got to do what you've got to do! 🤷‍♂️

[errelevant @errelevant_t]

@LiberalHivemind The vast majority of blacks, regardless of their professed political affiliation, will always pick their co-ethnics above anyone else, regardless of justice, truth and facts. These people have shown repeatedly that they can't coexist with Europeans and their descendants.

[errelevant @errelevant_t]

@reddit_lies Right, because that's the thing to focus on, not the fact that you keep building houses that the wind can blow away super easily.

[errelevant @errelevant_t]

@Laura55977Laura @meds3333 @TheOnlyDSC I'm too young and didn't witness it live. My point, however, is that given the same jurors, the outcome would have been the same regardless of whether the prosecution did a good job or a bad one.

[errelevant @errelevant_t]

@cho_lee2 @morrisoi37 @toltolpapa Excuse me, I'm quite curious. Could you tell me what happened here, please?

[errelevant @errelevant_t]

@lose014666 @morrisoi37 Excuse me, I'm quite curious. Could you tell me what happened here, please?

[errelevant @errelevant_t]

@Laura55977Laura @meds3333 @TheOnlyDSC This comment implies that if the prosecution had done a better job the outcome could have been different.

After seeing a few of the black jurors talk about it, it's clear they knew the outcome of the trial before the trial even started, nothing was going to change that.

[errelevant @errelevant_t]

@YellowFlashGuy What ass? Those leggings are doing some heavy lifting there.

She's very cute, but that's a toned flat ass.

[errelevant @errelevant_t]

@Arlieredeyejedi @TheRWCoalition My good sir, I wish I had the time to go and rewatch that video again. However, because I've got things to do, I'm going to forfeit, and just like Andrew, you've DESTROYED me in this most formal of debates. That's 5 points for Gryffindor, thanks to you.

[errelevant @errelevant_t]

@Arlieredeyejedi @TheRWCoalition 100% not what happened, and just reaffirms what I said that the terms aren't clear and they're not both agreeing to the same thing.

But you do you, boo boo. 😉

[errelevant @errelevant_t]

@Arlieredeyejedi @TheRWCoalition Out of the top of my mind, the first time Dave Smith and Andrew talked. That was VERY memorable. I know there's been others, but I can't remember them and I honestly don't fancy going over Andrew's past catalogue right now. You can choose to believe me or not, either is ok 🤷‍♂️

[errelevant @errelevant_t]

I genuinely don't fucking care for liberalism. A system that tells lawyers that they must defend people who CLEARLY did the crime and are fucking demons is an unredeemable and demonic system itself.

https://t.co/5Ds8SqaRQ9

[errelevant @errelevant_t]

@Arlieredeyejedi @TheRWCoalition Again, I don't know the minutia of this situation. My point is that I've seen Andrew start a conversation with someone and the other person thinks they're just going to have a normal conversation.

[errelevant @errelevant_t]

@IzykHaze @TheRWCoalition This is such a retarded take...

So anyone who engages with Andrew in any capacity does so to engage in a structured debate to "win"? I bet you're stupid enough to also think "winning" a debate means that what the winner said was true too.

[errelevant @errelevant_t]

@Arlieredeyejedi @TheRWCoalition I don't know the details of this particular situation, but I've seen many, MANY times in which someone engages Andrew in what they think is just going to be a conversation or an informal debate, and Andrew jumps with the "we need a moderator" structured debate BS.

[errelevant @errelevant_t]

@TheRWCoalition He does say things I'm glad someone with a big platform is able to say. He wouldn't put me off as much if he was willing to have more conversations and not just try to engage everyone on a "structured debate"; that's so autistic.

[errelevant @errelevant_t]

@PooWorldOrderr "People"... Sure, bloke in video... It's everyone equally... 😐

[errelevant @errelevant_t]

@Mericamemed No marinara on pizza?!

It's ok, goodbye kissing. I can do other things with women.

[errelevant @errelevant_t]

@DanFriedman81 @valleybitchh Daniel's statement is evidently false.

Now the question is whether Daniel is saying it because he didn't bother to look into it at all or if he's intentionally trying to deceive people.

[errelevant @errelevant_t]

CONTROVERSIAL HOT TAKE: The callous PC in the Henry Nowak case is a victim too.