Bruno J. Escobedo

[Bruno J. Escobedo @escobedev]

El MRTA perseguía personas LGBT porque las consideraba una expresión de la decadencia capitalista.

Décadas después, algunos sectores las señalan como una consecuencia del socialismo o del “marxismo cultural”.

Cambia la ideología. El chivo expiatorio sigue siendo el mismo.

[Bruno J. Escobedo @escobedev]

Confundir “izquierda” con “progresismo” es un error histórico.

El MRTA, una organización terrorista, justificó la persecución de personas LGBT como parte de sus “Cruzadas contra el vicio”.

Los consideraban conductas “inmorales” y consecuencias del capitalismo.

[Bruno J. Escobedo @escobedev]

@LeadSat @CFC_Junior_ @MrBeast It’s like they’re making you take the decision whether you want to kill other people or not. That’s not “changing the scenario”, it’s having reading comprehension.

[Bruno J. Escobedo @escobedev]

@LeadSat @CFC_Junior_ @MrBeast I didn’t Make any scenario up, it’s literally the same game. If more than 50% press blue (if blue wins) everyone survives (nothing happens as if blue button doesn’t exist).
If less than 50% press blue (if red wins) only reds survive (blues die as if red button is a killer button)

[Bruno J. Escobedo @escobedev]

@caval1924 @Jhonabarez @SantiagoGastana Yo no sería tan ingenuo, las dinamicas de poder nos puede convertir en bananeros así la diplomacia exista solo sobre papel. No me opongo a negociar con EEUU pero nuestros diplomáticos debieron protestar ante las amenazas gratis recibidas y el trato desigual.

[Bruno J. Escobedo @escobedev]

@Javierhdvl @AlertaNewsPlus Ese pensamiento incentiva a que exista más gente como Luigi Mangione.

[Bruno J. Escobedo @escobedev]

@Jhonabarez @SantiagoGastana En la UNI se ha abierto una carrera de ingeniería aeroespacial por ese mismo motivo, pero aún tienen q pasar años. Y sí, dado q es proyecto de la Nasa va a estar bajo su control por eso están incrementando su seguridad militar construyendo más bases y vendiendonos esos aviones.

[Bruno J. Escobedo @escobedev]

@QuoteNietzsche Nop, it’s shaped by our emotional being. Fear, empathy, shame is shaped by culture, traumas, experiences. Our rational self only analyzes the scenario, identify all the options, gets filled with nuance, but our emotions narrow the options by impulse so we can be decisive.

[Bruno J. Escobedo @escobedev]

@LeadSat @CFC_Junior_ @MrBeast Also blue is only symbolic. Nothing happens if they win, outcome is unaltered. The button can be removed preserving the same dynamic. So in a game with just 1 button: you have the option to press the button to kill those who didn’t or not press it at all. Why would you press it?

[Bruno J. Escobedo @escobedev]

@corsaren In fairness, blue button is not required to exist since blue winning means nothing happens. so if you remove it, it becomes whether you press the red button to kill those who didn’t or not press it at all. Why would you press it?

[Bruno J. Escobedo @escobedev]

@SwordMasterPub Actually, refuse to push any button is the same as voting blue. At the start everyone is alive. If blue wins that keeps the same. It’s like the blue button is not even required to exist. It’s just people choosing red and kill those who didn’t.

[Bruno J. Escobedo @escobedev]

@CodyLibolt @jwlecheminant You’re hiding the killing factor. No one is hunting for blues until people choose “safety”. In reality they’re choosing “hunt the blues”.

[Bruno J. Escobedo @escobedev]

@ayushthehipster @muyhiram @get_dunk I was actually being funny

[Bruno J. Escobedo @escobedev]

@TexasAnCap It’s not the same starting conditions, cuz everyone starts by not jumping in. As if everyone voted red and you’re asking them if they want to change their vote. It’s not the same.

[Bruno J. Escobedo @escobedev]

@Nobleshield @OrwellsNotebook Blue wins -> everyone parties.
Red wins -> some people die.

Blue mentality -> Let’s party 😀
Red mentality -> Let’s kill some people and blame it on them for exposing.

Rap*st mentality -> Let’s r*pe some girls and blame it on them for exposing.

[Bruno J. Escobedo @escobedev]

@OrwellsNotebook Saving doesn’t exist, it’s not wanting to harm.
There are 2 outcomes:
Blue wins -> people party and hug each other.
Red wins -> people are murdered.
Retards -> Let’s murder the blues and blame it on them :D

[Bruno J. Escobedo @escobedev]

@VitoComedy There are 2 outcomes: Blue wins, nobody was harmed. Red wins, people will die.
Red retards: Let’s murder some people :D

[Bruno J. Escobedo @escobedev]

@hate__criminal @YeaItsMeMilky If it were real, someone would have to kill the blues. People don’t die because they lose. Having to vote for an explicit killer put reds explicitly as the violent option, people wouldn’t go for that so blue will win even by a higher poll.

[Bruno J. Escobedo @escobedev]

@TexasAnCap No one knows if you’re living around killers, so people constantly test by risking themselves a little disguising as prey to address the predators in the room.