@SnwflakeDetectr@ICXCsRedneck Bias, because the allies were all in the west with no immediate threat from soviet imperialism. They were quick to throw the east under the bus and nod along to soviet massacres and war crimes
@kupar_kerrie@GooseplanJD@artyomiscool@thepalehundreds >"the communist still have china" and china is nationalist & corporatist, which is core (italian) fascist doctrine 😭😭😭
2) marxists only in power in 4th world brown countries
3) an innocent soviet does not exist, they all aided soviet imperialism. Keep coping
@GooseplanJD@artyomiscool@thepalehundreds Seeing as it is still a more relevant movement than communism to this day, I wouldn't say so (and funny you say soviet mongols 'wiped' them out while german chads liquidated 27 MILLION of your ape population🤣🤣)
@Braaaaapsloudly@nyiuchan Ww1 allies had TEMPORARY war measures and private ownership remained intact, stock markets operated freely and it all went back to normal post war.+ comparing an agrarian slaveowning market economy to socialism is fucking insane, would you like to explain how you even invented ts
@Braaaaapsloudly@nyiuchan 1)None of those are core elements of capitalism 2)The ussr eliminated value form in the capitalist sense (otherwise production would be goverbed by law of value, not directed by state planning) 3) Under capitalism, surplus value is extracted by private owners for individual (1/2)
@Braaaaapsloudly@nyiuchan Capitalist ideology is based on two things: 1) private property and right to own means of production 2) prices being set dynamically by competition and demand. NEITHER of these existed at all in the ussr. Stop redefining capitalism to suit your retarded revisionist views nigga
@3TO_POCC Talking about population ratios as if Russian apes aren't known for losing even when having insane advantages. Battle of the tannenberg line when they had 7x more men and 17x more casualties