meta is basically the yankees or the dodgers right now. they’re loading up the roster with elite ai researchers, dumping billions into infra, & signaling we’re going for it. when you do that, the world expects rings. you don’t get to say “we’re still experimenting” after you dropped $20b+ & poached half of openai.
the pressure is now insane. every paper, every product, every demo will be scrutinized like a playoff performance. all eyes on the scoreboard.
@basedjensen As long as intelligence continues to move with scale (size, reasoning time) and quality of knowledge distillation continues to hold, it feels likely that the majority of self hosted cases would be distillations of the true frontier models
@mattparlmer A separator for startups could be having the engineering discipline to design systems with efficient use of model intelligence rather than raw use of scale. Then enough inference know-how to serve their minimum viable stack of models on energy efficient hardware with good perf
After falling in game one, 6-4, @MIT_Baseball rallied to score five runs in the final two innings to win game two over Chapman, 8-5!
Recap and stats: https://t.co/QBoN01NeYL
College hitters slashed .374/.369/.597 against first pitch fastballs that were in the zone last year. Gotta love establishing the fastball by giving up an absolute nuke.
💯💯💯
Way too much unneeded guesswork when it comes to throwing volume and intensity, especially during preseason on ramping and mid season workload management.
@DrivelinePulse can help quantify throwing measures that have largely been left to “gut feel” up to this point.
Do a running workout, check total distance (volume) and pace (intensity) when you're done - extremely standard
Do a throwing workout, check total throws (volume) and average arm speed (intensity) - this can/should be just as standard
@DrivelinePulse
Dylan Cease went full in on the mustache in 2022, here's how his offerings have developed since 2021.
⛽️ FF - stuff: 182 -> 195
🍔 SL - mph: 85.9 -> 87.2, stuff: 134 -> 146
🪝 CB - mph: 79.9 -> 81.0, stuff: 116 -> 144
Moral of the story? For better stuff, grow a moustache 🥸
I usually don't tweet cocky shit like this (at least unironically!) but no one else is collecting, analyzing + making actionable as large/elite of a dataset as us in the ⚾️biomechanics
Feel confident af on that & on @DrivelineBB continuing to push the✉️on research here b/c of it
Thus - a null model (just taking the average mechanics) is able to get to what initially would appear to be somewhat good R^2 and RMSE values and therefore the cutoff for what we’re looking for in terms of accuracy should be higher than it might initially intuitively seem.
n/n
For markerless mocap validation, we often see R^2 values >0.85 and RMSE values <10deg when comparing all points from time series across systems. But what's good? What would we see if a hypothetical system just predicted avg mechanics for every throw? 1/n