@a4mrofficial I can hardly think of a single PCA person that would not agree with practically all of this.
You oppose this extreme and that extreme? Wonderful! At what point exactly do those extremes begin?
Is there more clarity that you plan to give to this mildly blurry vision?
@a4mrofficial I appreciate the fact that, as said in the recording, publishing multiple views on the issue of female deacons is not an organizational endorsement of any one of those views. But is it your hope/goal that each of those views will be constitutionally permissible within the PCA?
Genuine question: Is this saying that men of good character and principles who differ on truths and forms should be admitted to the PCA? Or that such men who are members of other denominations should not be considered non-Christians simply because they disagree with the PCA?
@derekradney Thanks for sharing this. According to this graphic the entirety of the WCF seems to be in the secondary category (unless it is actually above it in the primary category). Would you agree with that, @derekradney?
Yet the name of their organization is the Alliance for MISSION and Renewal. If they really want to recover the "confessional center," why don't they want to be an alliance for confessional renewal? @derekradney @a4mr 2/2
I find it interesting is that this group is looking for "deeper recovery of our confessional and missional center." "Confessional" and "missional" are both a sort of code words for "more conservative" and "less conservative" respectively. 1/2
The board of AMR calls for renewal in the PCA—grounded not in reaction, but in a deeper recovery of our confessional and missional center.
https://t.co/e8VmP7JvOc
Not trying to beat a dead horse on the https://t.co/SnI2kZHzxU petition... but it is interesting that not a single RE was among the initial signatories. Is it worth asking why?
Were they not asked? Did they not agree?
#pcaga
1/2
RE's are also underrepresented in the general signatories. In fact, it is the second smallest category. Below is the breakdown on the current signatures and their relationship to the PCA. I think the numbers are interesting.
2/2
#pcaga@presbycast
@SeanMLucas @jbyrd1000@ZGroff Actually, we don't have presbytery names on our name tags. The GA name tags list a TE's church and that church's location.
@JoshuaTorrey It seems that these are actually really good numbers, not problematic. All of these men were confirmed, at least in a sense, by representatives from all of the presbyteries at GA. Do you have info on how many of these came through NomComm vs. the floor?
@sassiterian @blpjr77 The things you highlighted are also exclusive to the elder when they are "discharged as official duties." I think that's also a helpful clarification. Should non-ordained folk read the Bible? Absolutely. Should they do it as an official duty? That's a different question.
DPS Books and Merch Giveaway: @gptseminary and @prpbooks are giving away books and limited edition Dead Presbyterian Society podcast merchandise - 10 winners! #deadpresbyteriansociety https://t.co/y2DSh6T1pG
@ZGroff The original video shared started with Littlepage saying, "There are many in this room who know the full story, but I want everyone to hear it from me as your pastor."
He might have made the announcement without their knowledge. But it definitely seems likely that leaders knew.
@ZGroff He said that the announcement about the "new theological commitments" was made without the knowledge of the leadership. But he did not say that that the leadership was unaware of those "new theological commitments". The question about who knew and when remains unanswered.
@thisisfoster @GraceMosaic The Catholic school that hired him to do youth ministry and teach music posted a picture of him in their swag announcing him in that role on the 27th of August. The wheels to go there, setup classrooms, etc. would have to have been in motion well prior.