Danielle Tirserio 💋

Owner of EVOKE Boudoir Studio - Washington, DC's Premier Luxury Boudoir Photography Experience

[Danielle Tirserio 💋 @evokeboudoir]

@RMBeem10 @BeaubienSara @CarolineKaneTX Happy to hear and see your concrete evidence.

[Danielle Tirserio 💋 @evokeboudoir]

There’s a misconception that courts did not hear election cases or that evidence was dismissed without review. In reality, many courts across various states and federal jurisdictions reviewed election-related cases after previous elections. The majority of cases were dismissed not because evidence wasn’t allowed, but because they lacked sufficient evidence, had procedural issues, or failed to meet legal standards required for the claims being made.

Here’s a breakdown of why these cases often didn’t proceed:

1.Lack of Standing: Many lawsuits were dismissed because the plaintiffs lacked standing. Standing is a legal requirement meaning the party bringing the case must show they were directly harmed by the actions in question. In numerous cases, courts found that the plaintiffs did not meet this standard.

2.Insufficient Evidence: Courts require credible evidence to substantiate claims of widespread fraud or errors that could alter election outcomes. Many cases presented speculation, hearsay, or affidavits that did not provide verifiable facts, leading judges to conclude there wasn’t enough evidence to move forward.

3.Procedural Issues: Some cases were filed with procedural errors, such as being submitted too late or in the wrong jurisdiction. Courts dismissed these cases based on technicalities that are essential in the legal system to ensure fairness and order.

4.Failure to Meet Legal Standards: Claims of election fraud or misconduct must meet strict legal standards, especially when seeking to invalidate votes or overturn results. Many cases did not meet these standards, as judges ruled that the evidence was either not convincing or did not demonstrate a significant impact on the outcome.

5.Judicial Reviews and Appeals: Many cases went through appeals processes, allowing higher courts to review decisions. In the end, no court found widespread fraud or irregularities that would justify changing election outcomes.

The legal system operates on rigorous standards, and claims without adequate evidence are dismissed to uphold the integrity of the courts. Assertions that these cases weren’t “allowed” to present evidence often misunderstand the legal requirements for valid claims. Courts reviewed the claims according to legal protocols and dismissed those that didn’t meet the necessary standards.

[Danielle Tirserio 💋 @evokeboudoir]

It’s important to clarify that discrepancies in early voting data or polling location reports are not evidence of “cheating.” Harris County, being one of the largest and most diverse counties in Texas, manages a significant volume of voting data across numerous locations. This volume requires regular data reconciliation to ensure accuracy. Adjustments may occur due to legitimate reasons such as reassigning votes to the correct precinct, processing provisional ballots, or correcting data entry errors. These processes are standard and transparent parts of election administration.

The phrase “known cheaters” is often used without any factual basis. Allegations of widespread fraud in Harris County have been investigated in past elections, with no evidence found to support claims of systemic cheating. Election processes are subject to bipartisan oversight, and any irregularities are investigated thoroughly. Furthermore, Harris County adheres to the same election laws and protocols as other Texas counties, including Galveston, and any allegations of misconduct would be subject to state-level scrutiny.

Ensuring fair and accurate elections is a priority for all election officials, and public accountability mechanisms are in place to maintain transparency. Misunderstandings around normal administrative processes shouldn’t be mistaken for wrongdoing.

[Danielle Tirserio 💋 @evokeboudoir]

This tweet contains several inaccuracies about Nevada’s ballot-counting process. Let’s break down the claims and address them with factual information:

1.Counting Ballots After Election Day: Nevada law does allow ballots to be counted after Election Day if they were cast on time. The goal is to ensure all legally cast ballots, including those from military members, overseas voters, and mail ballots postmarked by Election Day, are counted. This is not unique to Nevada; many states have similar provisions.

2.Three-Day Counting Window: Nevada does allow ballots that are postmarked by Election Day to arrive within a specific period (usually up to four days after) to be counted. This helps account for delays in mail delivery and ensures voters are not disenfranchised due to factors outside their control. However, this does not mean officials “wait” to see how many votes are needed; all ballots go through strict verification processes.

3.“They Don’t Even Have to Be Postmarked”: This statement is incorrect. In Nevada, ballots must be postmarked by Election Day to be counted if they arrive after Election Day. This postmark requirement ensures that only ballots submitted on or before Election Day are included in the final tally.

4.Legality of Extended Counting: The extended period for counting ballots that arrive after Election Day, if postmarked correctly, is legal and falls under Nevada’s state law. This is similar to practices in other states and is intended to ensure every eligible vote is counted, especially for mail-in voters who may face postal delays.

Nevada’s post-election counting procedures are designed to be fair and ensure all timely ballots are counted, maintaining transparency and following state laws.

[Danielle Tirserio 💋 @evokeboudoir]

@catturd2 Withhhh whatttt evidenceeeee??

[Danielle Tirserio 💋 @evokeboudoir]

The tweet you shared mentions layoffs and suggests that job numbers are part of “election propaganda,” with references to job cuts in September 2024 and the Challenger, Gray & Christmas report. To provide a more balanced perspective and debunk the claim or assess the context, here are some important points:

1.Election Season and Employment Data: It is common for public figures to question economic data, particularly around election periods. However, job numbers released by governmental and independent agencies are typically vetted and subject to revision. These figures reflect larger economic trends and are often reported monthly by agencies like the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).

2.Challenger, Gray & Christmas Data: This is a legitimate firm that tracks job cuts announced by companies. According to their recent reports, job cuts have been on the rise in 2024, especially in sectors like technology and manufacturing. However, job cut announcements do not reflect the full labor market picture. Other indicators, like job creation and unemployment rates, also contribute to the overall view of the economy.

3.Broader Context: While layoffs are one metric, job growth in other sectors (such as healthcare and hospitality) might offset these losses. The BLS data for September 2024, when released, should provide a clearer picture of total employment changes, including layoffs, new hires, and unemployment rates.

4.Increases in Layoffs: It’s true that layoffs have risen in certain areas due to factors like higher interest rates and sector-specific downturns, such as in tech or manufacturing. This might give the impression of a broader economic downturn, though the overall health of the job market can still be strong depending on other sectors.

5.Political Angle: Economic data can be politicized, especially close to elections. It’s crucial to look at reports from multiple sources, like independent economic analysts, to avoid skewed interpretations.

Thus, the claim in your tweet seems focused on one side of the economic story, emphasizing layoffs without accounting for other labor market dynamics like job openings, unemployment rate, or industry-specific growth. For a more accurate assessment, cross-referencing job cuts with overall employment trends is essential.

[Tom Bonier @tbonier]

I'll be the first to admit that I exist in a fairly partisan bubble, but I can't imagine that "it's not fair that they keep pointing out that we're lying" is quite as effective of an argument as the GOP seems to think it is.

[Danielle Tirserio 💋 @evokeboudoir]

@Dani_PA The middle east is a tinder box. JD…. My name is…

[Danielle Tirserio 💋 @evokeboudoir]

Trump was asked the following question at The Economic Club of NY. “If you win in November, can you commit to prioritizing legislation to make childcare affordable, and if so, what specific piece of legislation would you advance?”

Trump responded: “Well, I would do that, and we’re sitting down, and I was, somebody, we had Senator Marco Rubio, and my daughter Ivanka was so impactful on that issue. It’s a very important issue. But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about, that, because, look, child care is child care is. It’s, couldn’t, you know, there’s something, you have to have it. In this country you have to have it.

But when you talk about those numbers compared to the kind of numbers that I’m talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they’re not used to — but they’ll get used to it very quickly – and it’s not gonna stop them from doing business with us, but they’ll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country. Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we’re talking about, including child care, that it’s going to take care.

We’re gonna have — I, I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time, coupled with the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country, because I have to stay with child care. I want to stay with child care, but those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I’m talking about, including growth, but growth also headed up by what the plan is that I just, that I just told you about.

We’re gonna be taking in trillions of dollars, and as much as child care is talked about as being expensive, it’s relatively speaking not very expensive compared to the kind of numbers we’ll be taking in. We’re going to make this into an incredible country that can afford to take care of its people, and then we’ll worry about the rest of the world. Let’s help other people. But we’re going to take care of our country first. This is about America first. It’s about Make America Great Again. We have to do it because right now we’re a failing nation, so we’ll take care of it.”

WhAT?!

[Danielle Tirserio 💋 @evokeboudoir]

Trump was asked the following question at The Economic Club of NY. “If you win in November, can you commit to prioritizing legislation to make childcare affordable, and if so, what specific piece of legislation would you advance?”

Trump responded: “Well, I would do that, and we’re sitting down, and I was, somebody, we had Senator Marco Rubio, and my daughter Ivanka was so impactful on that issue. It’s a very important issue. But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about, that, because, look, child care is child care is. It’s, couldn’t, you know, there’s something, you have to have it. In this country you have to have it.

But when you talk about those numbers compared to the kind of numbers that I’m talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they’re not used to — but they’ll get used to it very quickly – and it’s not gonna stop them from doing business with us, but they’ll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country. Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we’re talking about, including child care, that it’s going to take care.

We’re gonna have — I, I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time, coupled with the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country, because I have to stay with child care. I want to stay with child care, but those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I’m talking about, including growth, but growth also headed up by what the plan is that I just, that I just told you about.

We’re gonna be taking in trillions of dollars, and as much as child care is talked about as being expensive, it’s relatively speaking not very expensive compared to the kind of numbers we’ll be taking in. We’re going to make this into an incredible country that can afford to take care of its people, and then we’ll worry about the rest of the world. Let’s help other people. But we’re going to take care of our country first. This is about America first. It’s about Make America Great Again. We have to do it because right now we’re a failing nation, so we’ll take care of it.”

WhAT?!

[Danielle Tirserio 💋 @evokeboudoir]

This is out there. Even for you guys.

[Ann Vandersteel™️ @annvandersteel]

BREAKING: Does Diddy have BLACKMAIL SEX PARTY TAPES that are being used to extort celebrities into endorsing Kamala?

It certainly fits THE PATTERN.

Ben Stiller, Julia Roberts, Meryl Streep, Chris Rock, Jennifer LOW-pez.

All have “partied” with P Diddy.

P DIDDY TRAFFICKS KIDS AND WOMEN THROUGH HIS PARTIES.

You can literally see the terror in their eyes when they zoom in or post videos about supporting Harris.

It’s not “CELEBRITIES” for Harris.

It’s HOSTAGES FOR HARRIS.

“If you endorse, we’ll keep your degenerate secrets.”

“If you don't, your career is OVER.”

It’s always a wonderful thing to see the libs eating themselves.

We just have to pray that voters see through this CHARADE and vote COUNTRY OVER CELEBRITY.

[Ann Vandersteel™️ @annvandersteel]

BREAKING: Does Diddy have BLACKMAIL SEX PARTY TAPES that are being used to extort celebrities into endorsing Kamala?

It certainly fits THE PATTERN.

Ben Stiller, Julia Roberts, Meryl Streep, Chris Rock, Jennifer LOW-pez.

All have “partied” with P Diddy.

P DIDDY TRAFFICKS KIDS AND WOMEN THROUGH HIS PARTIES.

You can literally see the terror in their eyes when they zoom in or post videos about supporting Harris.

It’s not “CELEBRITIES” for Harris.

It’s HOSTAGES FOR HARRIS.

“If you endorse, we’ll keep your degenerate secrets.”

“If you don't, your career is OVER.”

It’s always a wonderful thing to see the libs eating themselves.

We just have to pray that voters see through this CHARADE and vote COUNTRY OVER CELEBRITY.

[Danielle Tirserio 💋 @evokeboudoir]

@MaddowBlog @maddow

[Danielle Tirserio 💋 @evokeboudoir]

This is adorable. 🙄

[Gunther Eagleman™ @GuntherEagleman]

The Kamala Harris campaign is completely collapsing, and to be honest, I am really enjoying watching it.

[Danielle Tirserio 💋 @evokeboudoir]

@Timodc Thank you for doing this so we don’t have to.

[Danielle Tirserio 💋 @evokeboudoir]

@GuntherEagleman @shannonrwatts care to fact check?

[Brendan May @bmay]

Pete Buttigieg is one of the smartest and most capable political communicators on the planet. This is extremely insightful on Trump.

[Danielle Tirserio 💋 @evokeboudoir]

@TimRunsHisMouth She spews vile racism and hate. Those are two good reasons.

[Danielle Tirserio 💋 @evokeboudoir]

Abortion is not simply about escaping the consequences of pregnancy; it is a vital part of healthcare that can be necessary to protect the health and life of the pregnant individual. For example, in cases of ectopic pregnancy, where a fertilized egg implants outside the uterus, continuing the pregnancy is life-threatening, as it can cause the fallopian tube to rupture, leading to severe bleeding and potentially death. Similarly, when prenatal tests reveal severe fetal anomalies incompatible with life, such as anencephaly, abortion can prevent prolonged suffering for both the fetus and the parents by allowing them to make a compassionate and medically informed decision. Additionally, in situations where continuing a pregnancy poses a significant risk to the mother's health, such as with severe preeclampsia, abortion may be necessary to prevent life-threatening complications like organ failure or stroke. These examples highlight how abortion can be a crucial medical intervention aimed at safeguarding the health and well-being of the individual.